lastID = -295029
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Dane County Manure Study
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:32:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:36:33 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:36:32 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Dane County Manure Study

Dane County Manure Study

Dane County Manure Study

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Dane County Manure Study
Abstract
The project goal was to investigate manure management alternatives to land application of raw manure. These alternatives considered single farm systems as well as clusters of farms. The major objective was to remove at least 50% of the phosphorus (P) from the land. The study began with a survey of the farmers in the Upper Mendota Watershed. The study examined the technical, logistical, financial, and environmental factors related to implementing alternative manure management approaches to accommodate the manure from two farm clusters. Alternatives were evaluated using monetary and nonmonetary factors, with sensitivity analyses for critical monetary factors. Because there are no community facilities in operation in the Midwest and nationally there are only a limited number of examples, issues such as permitting, potential ownership models, and funding alternatives needed to be considered as part of the feasibility study.
The project goal was to investigate manure management alternatives to land application of raw manure. These alternatives considered single farm systems as well as clusters of farms. The major objective was to remove at least 50% of the phosphorus (P) from the land. The study began with a survey of the farmers in the Upper Mendota Watershed. The study examined the technical, logistical, financial,...
Author(s)
Rachel M. LeeRandall A. WirtzJohn Reindl
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 41: Nutrient Control Strategies – Viewpoints from Our Young Professionals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:13L.3043;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788733422
Volume / Issue2008 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3043 - 3060
Copyright2008
Word count142

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dane County Manure Study'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Dane County Manure Study
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295029
Get access
-295029
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dane County Manure Study'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Dane County Manure Study
Abstract
The project goal was to investigate manure management alternatives to land application of raw manure. These alternatives considered single farm systems as well as clusters of farms. The major objective was to remove at least 50% of the phosphorus (P) from the land. The study began with a survey of the farmers in the Upper Mendota Watershed. The study examined the technical, logistical, financial, and environmental factors related to implementing alternative manure management approaches to accommodate the manure from two farm clusters. Alternatives were evaluated using monetary and nonmonetary factors, with sensitivity analyses for critical monetary factors. Because there are no community facilities in operation in the Midwest and nationally there are only a limited number of examples, issues such as permitting, potential ownership models, and funding alternatives needed to be considered as part of the feasibility study.
The project goal was to investigate manure management alternatives to land application of raw manure. These alternatives considered single farm systems as well as clusters of farms. The major objective was to remove at least 50% of the phosphorus (P) from the land. The study began with a survey of the farmers in the Upper Mendota Watershed. The study examined the technical, logistical, financial,...
Author(s)
Rachel M. LeeRandall A. WirtzJohn Reindl
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 41: Nutrient Control Strategies – Viewpoints from Our Young Professionals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:13L.3043;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788733422
Volume / Issue2008 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3043 - 3060
Copyright2008
Word count142

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Rachel M. Lee# Randall A. Wirtz# John Reindl. Dane County Manure Study. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 12 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295029CITANCHOR>.
Rachel M. Lee# Randall A. Wirtz# John Reindl. Dane County Manure Study. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 12, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295029CITANCHOR.
Rachel M. Lee# Randall A. Wirtz# John Reindl
Dane County Manure Study
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 12, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295029CITANCHOR