lastID = -295504
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:00:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 15:00:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:42:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:42:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:16:51 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:16:50 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality

Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality

Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality
Abstract
Biosolids land application was demonstrated to be a potentially cost effective approach for restoring forage productivity and enhancing soil moisture holding capacity on disturbed and/or marginal rangelands. By applying aerobically digested, anaerobically digested, composted and lime stabilized biosolids on rangeland test plots at rates of up to twenty times (20X) the estimated agronomic rate, forage yields were found to increase from 118.2 lbs/acre (control plots) to 1052.8 lbs/acre on rangeland plots receiving biosolids.In spite of the economic and environmental benefits associated with increased forage yield (e.g., higher animal stocking rates, reduced soil erosion, improved drainage, etc.) the type of forage generated both before and after biosolids land application was found to be dominated by invasive weeds all of which were characterized as having fair to poor nutritional value. Of the nine dominant plant species identified including; 1) Cheatgrass, 2) Mouse Barley, 3) Bur Buttercup, 4) Mexican Fireweed, 5) Herb Sophia, 6) Bulbous Bluegrass, 7) Clasping Pepperweed, 8) Tall Tumblemustard and 9) Sticky Purple Geranium, only Sticky Purple Geranium is native to United States (US) rangelands. Furthermore, over 98% of the measured plant density on all rangeland test plots was characterized by invasive species regardless of the biosolids type or application rate employed. Opportunistic and shallow rooting invasive weeds not only have marginal nutritional value for support of wildlife and livestock, they also limit the establishment of native perennial grasses and thus, biodiversity. Many of the identified invasive species (e.g., Cheatgrass) also dry-out rapidly, a characteristic that significantly increases the fuel loads that currently support the increased frequency and extent of US wildfires.In evaluating rangeland restoration approaches, the collected field data clearly demonstrated that biosolids land application provided vital nutrients and organic matter necessary for enhanced forage growth as well as improved soil and water management. However, vast areas of US rangeland (including the demonstration field plots) are characterized by extensive infestation by invasive weeds (biological pollution) whose presence is associated with a number of negative economic and environmental consequences including reduced: 1) forage quality, 2) biodiversity, 3) livestock health and 4) wildfire mitigation potential. Restoring and sustaining rangeland health will require a strategic and multi-Agency approach. Targeted reseeding of native grass species in combination with biosolids land application represents a potentially effective means to reversing the spread of invasive plant species while improving the environmental health, biodiversity and economic value of disturbed rangelands.
Biosolids land application was demonstrated to be a potentially cost effective approach for restoring forage productivity and enhancing soil moisture holding capacity on disturbed and/or marginal rangelands. By applying aerobically digested, anaerobically digested, composted and lime stabilized biosolids on rangeland test plots at rates of up to twenty times (20X) the estimated agronomic rate,...
Author(s)
Michael J. McFarlandMaiAnh VutranIssaak Romero VasquezMark SchmitzRobert B. BrobstLinden Greenhalgh
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 8: Nutrients and Land Applications
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:3L.465;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788806476
Volume / Issue2008 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)465 - 477
Copyright2008
Word count401

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295504
Get access
-295504
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality
Abstract
Biosolids land application was demonstrated to be a potentially cost effective approach for restoring forage productivity and enhancing soil moisture holding capacity on disturbed and/or marginal rangelands. By applying aerobically digested, anaerobically digested, composted and lime stabilized biosolids on rangeland test plots at rates of up to twenty times (20X) the estimated agronomic rate, forage yields were found to increase from 118.2 lbs/acre (control plots) to 1052.8 lbs/acre on rangeland plots receiving biosolids.In spite of the economic and environmental benefits associated with increased forage yield (e.g., higher animal stocking rates, reduced soil erosion, improved drainage, etc.) the type of forage generated both before and after biosolids land application was found to be dominated by invasive weeds all of which were characterized as having fair to poor nutritional value. Of the nine dominant plant species identified including; 1) Cheatgrass, 2) Mouse Barley, 3) Bur Buttercup, 4) Mexican Fireweed, 5) Herb Sophia, 6) Bulbous Bluegrass, 7) Clasping Pepperweed, 8) Tall Tumblemustard and 9) Sticky Purple Geranium, only Sticky Purple Geranium is native to United States (US) rangelands. Furthermore, over 98% of the measured plant density on all rangeland test plots was characterized by invasive species regardless of the biosolids type or application rate employed. Opportunistic and shallow rooting invasive weeds not only have marginal nutritional value for support of wildlife and livestock, they also limit the establishment of native perennial grasses and thus, biodiversity. Many of the identified invasive species (e.g., Cheatgrass) also dry-out rapidly, a characteristic that significantly increases the fuel loads that currently support the increased frequency and extent of US wildfires.In evaluating rangeland restoration approaches, the collected field data clearly demonstrated that biosolids land application provided vital nutrients and organic matter necessary for enhanced forage growth as well as improved soil and water management. However, vast areas of US rangeland (including the demonstration field plots) are characterized by extensive infestation by invasive weeds (biological pollution) whose presence is associated with a number of negative economic and environmental consequences including reduced: 1) forage quality, 2) biodiversity, 3) livestock health and 4) wildfire mitigation potential. Restoring and sustaining rangeland health will require a strategic and multi-Agency approach. Targeted reseeding of native grass species in combination with biosolids land application represents a potentially effective means to reversing the spread of invasive plant species while improving the environmental health, biodiversity and economic value of disturbed rangelands.
Biosolids land application was demonstrated to be a potentially cost effective approach for restoring forage productivity and enhancing soil moisture holding capacity on disturbed and/or marginal rangelands. By applying aerobically digested, anaerobically digested, composted and lime stabilized biosolids on rangeland test plots at rates of up to twenty times (20X) the estimated agronomic rate,...
Author(s)
Michael J. McFarlandMaiAnh VutranIssaak Romero VasquezMark SchmitzRobert B. BrobstLinden Greenhalgh
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 8: Nutrients and Land Applications
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:3L.465;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788806476
Volume / Issue2008 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)465 - 477
Copyright2008
Word count401

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Michael J. McFarland# MaiAnh Vutran# Issaak Romero Vasquez# Mark Schmitz# Robert B. Brobst# Linden Greenhalgh. Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 9 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295504CITANCHOR>.
Michael J. McFarland# MaiAnh Vutran# Issaak Romero Vasquez# Mark Schmitz# Robert B. Brobst# Linden Greenhalgh. Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295504CITANCHOR.
Michael J. McFarland# MaiAnh Vutran# Issaak Romero Vasquez# Mark Schmitz# Robert B. Brobst# Linden Greenhalgh
Effect of Biosolids on Rangeland Forage Quality
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 9, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295504CITANCHOR