lastID = -295706
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:28:01 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:28:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 01:31:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:17 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:16 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:15 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS

COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS

COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS
Abstract
There are opportunities for direct and indirect carbon sequestration and emission offset in wastewater treatment. Biological processes partially convert oxygen demand to biomass, which can be digested, thus producing biogas and biosolids. Biogas can be used to offset carbon emissions by recovering its energy in a co-generation plant, energy that otherwise could be produced using a fossil fuel. Biosolids may be incinerated (i.e., immediate return of the carbon to the atmosphere), applied to land as soil amendment (i.e., retarded carbon return to the atmosphere), or buried in properly managed landfills (i.e., long-term carbon sequestration). The choice of biological treatment layouts affects the quantity of biomass produced and the process energy demand. In this paper we present the effects of biological process layout on the treatment's carbon and energy footprints. We also introduce our results on the effects of landfill distance on overall treatment footprint.
There are opportunities for direct and indirect carbon sequestration and emission offset in wastewater treatment. Biological processes partially convert oxygen demand to biomass, which can be digested, thus producing biogas and biosolids. Biogas can be used to offset carbon emissions by recovering its energy in a co-generation plant, energy that otherwise could be produced using a fossil fuel....
Author(s)
Diego RossoMichael K. Stenstrom
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Climate Change Mitigation at WWTPs
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:6L.286;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788808438
Volume / Issue2008 / 6
Content sourceSustainability Conference
First / last page(s)286 - 295
Copyright2008
Word count153

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295706
Get access
-295706
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS
Abstract
There are opportunities for direct and indirect carbon sequestration and emission offset in wastewater treatment. Biological processes partially convert oxygen demand to biomass, which can be digested, thus producing biogas and biosolids. Biogas can be used to offset carbon emissions by recovering its energy in a co-generation plant, energy that otherwise could be produced using a fossil fuel. Biosolids may be incinerated (i.e., immediate return of the carbon to the atmosphere), applied to land as soil amendment (i.e., retarded carbon return to the atmosphere), or buried in properly managed landfills (i.e., long-term carbon sequestration). The choice of biological treatment layouts affects the quantity of biomass produced and the process energy demand. In this paper we present the effects of biological process layout on the treatment's carbon and energy footprints. We also introduce our results on the effects of landfill distance on overall treatment footprint.
There are opportunities for direct and indirect carbon sequestration and emission offset in wastewater treatment. Biological processes partially convert oxygen demand to biomass, which can be digested, thus producing biogas and biosolids. Biogas can be used to offset carbon emissions by recovering its energy in a co-generation plant, energy that otherwise could be produced using a fossil fuel....
Author(s)
Diego RossoMichael K. Stenstrom
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Climate Change Mitigation at WWTPs
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:6L.286;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788808438
Volume / Issue2008 / 6
Content sourceSustainability Conference
First / last page(s)286 - 295
Copyright2008
Word count153

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Diego Rosso# Michael K. Stenstrom. COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295706CITANCHOR>.
Diego Rosso# Michael K. Stenstrom. COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295706CITANCHOR.
Diego Rosso# Michael K. Stenstrom
COMPARATIVE ENERGY- AND CARBON- FOOTPRINTS FOR ACTIVATED SLUDGE LAYOUTS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295706CITANCHOR