lastID = -295963
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 19:59:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 19:59:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:39 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:38 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems

Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems

Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems
Abstract
Two continuous MBRs treating municipal wastewater were compared in terms of fouling propensity: a biological nutrient removal (BNR-MBR) and a conventional (C-MBR). The soluble microbial products (SMP) and the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as well as their hydrophobic fractions were measured as protein and carbohydrate. The fouling rates were compared in both MBRs. The fouling rate was higher in the C-MBR system compared to the BNR-MBR due to higher concentrations and hydrophobicity of SMP which increased pore blocking resistance. The lower EPS concentrations per gVSS and hydrophobicity in the C-MBR resulted in floc size deterioration, which combined with a higher concentration per unit membrane area increased cake layer resistance. The findings of this study refute the notion that anoxic/anaerobic processes integral to biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems are conducive to membrane fouling. Additionally, this study concluded that membrane fouling is predominantly governed by the mixed liquor solids concentrations which affect SMP productions and characteristics.
Two continuous MBRs treating municipal wastewater were compared in terms of fouling propensity: a biological nutrient removal (BNR-MBR) and a conventional (C-MBR). The soluble microbial products (SMP) and the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as well as their hydrophobic fractions were measured as protein and carbohydrate. The fouling rates were compared in both MBRs. The fouling rate was...
Author(s)
Nermen MaximousSara ArabiMinGu KimGeorge Nakhla
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 82: Membrane Processes
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:9L.6186;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708790893602
Volume / Issue2008 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)6186 - 6194
Copyright2008
Word count164

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295963
Get access
-295963
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems
Abstract
Two continuous MBRs treating municipal wastewater were compared in terms of fouling propensity: a biological nutrient removal (BNR-MBR) and a conventional (C-MBR). The soluble microbial products (SMP) and the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as well as their hydrophobic fractions were measured as protein and carbohydrate. The fouling rates were compared in both MBRs. The fouling rate was higher in the C-MBR system compared to the BNR-MBR due to higher concentrations and hydrophobicity of SMP which increased pore blocking resistance. The lower EPS concentrations per gVSS and hydrophobicity in the C-MBR resulted in floc size deterioration, which combined with a higher concentration per unit membrane area increased cake layer resistance. The findings of this study refute the notion that anoxic/anaerobic processes integral to biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems are conducive to membrane fouling. Additionally, this study concluded that membrane fouling is predominantly governed by the mixed liquor solids concentrations which affect SMP productions and characteristics.
Two continuous MBRs treating municipal wastewater were compared in terms of fouling propensity: a biological nutrient removal (BNR-MBR) and a conventional (C-MBR). The soluble microbial products (SMP) and the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as well as their hydrophobic fractions were measured as protein and carbohydrate. The fouling rates were compared in both MBRs. The fouling rate was...
Author(s)
Nermen MaximousSara ArabiMinGu KimGeorge Nakhla
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 82: Membrane Processes
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:9L.6186;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708790893602
Volume / Issue2008 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)6186 - 6194
Copyright2008
Word count164

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Nermen Maximous# Sara Arabi# MinGu Kim# George Nakhla. Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 2 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295963CITANCHOR>.
Nermen Maximous# Sara Arabi# MinGu Kim# George Nakhla. Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295963CITANCHOR.
Nermen Maximous# Sara Arabi# MinGu Kim# George Nakhla
Comparison of Biofoulants in BNR-MBR and Conventional MBR (C-MBR) Systems
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 2, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295963CITANCHOR