lastID = -296624
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 21:33:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:07:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:40:03 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:40:02 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk

Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk

Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk
Abstract
A small Upstate New York city was spending more than 2,500 per month to monitor combined sewer overflow (CSO) frequency. In general the city's procedure was to observe the presence or absence of debris on the CSO weir after each significant rainfall event. The presence of debris indicated CSO activation. During the month, the city would visit each CSO location, record observations and then report findings to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). The city's discharge permit required the city to report annual CSO frequency to the NYS DEC.The NYS DEC questioned the city's approach to monitoring CSO frequency because the absence of debris on the CSO weir was not an absolute indication that a CSO event did not occur. The NYS DEC requested that the city develop a new approach to monitoring CSO frequency that provided a more robust indication of a positive or negative CSO occurrence.Stearns & Wheler developed a simple motion detector system that will continuously monitor and record motion. When this system is installed at the proper elevation in a CSO diversion structure, it can monitor and record when an overflow is occurring. As the combined sewer overflow occurs, the flowing water sets the motion detector into motion. This approach was accepted by the NYS DEC and the motion detector systems were installed on each of the twenty CSO diversion structures.Per acceptance by the NYS DEC, the installation of the motion detectors eliminated the need to inspect the CSOs after every significant rainfall event. The city now downloads data once per month instead of performing inspections after every significant rainfall event. The crews were routinely performing six or seven inspections per month. This simple approach to monitoring CSOs costs the city less money and provides a more conclusive indication of CSO frequency, which is acceptable to the NYS DEC. The cost of the equipment and software was approximately 200 (2008) for each of the twenty CSO diversion structures.
A small Upstate New York city was spending more than 2,500 per month to monitor combined sewer overflow (CSO) frequency. In general the city's procedure was to observe the presence or absence of debris on the CSO weir after each significant rainfall event. The presence of debris indicated CSO activation. During the month, the city would visit each CSO location, record observations and then report...
Author(s)
John J. LaGorgaJoseph H. Dodd
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12 - Infrastructure Risk Assessment and Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:2L.913;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793847537
Volume / Issue2009 / 2
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)913 - 919
Copyright2009
Word count337
Subject keywordsCombined Sewer Overflow (CSO)Flow Monitoring

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296624
Get access
-296624
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk
Abstract
A small Upstate New York city was spending more than 2,500 per month to monitor combined sewer overflow (CSO) frequency. In general the city's procedure was to observe the presence or absence of debris on the CSO weir after each significant rainfall event. The presence of debris indicated CSO activation. During the month, the city would visit each CSO location, record observations and then report findings to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). The city's discharge permit required the city to report annual CSO frequency to the NYS DEC.The NYS DEC questioned the city's approach to monitoring CSO frequency because the absence of debris on the CSO weir was not an absolute indication that a CSO event did not occur. The NYS DEC requested that the city develop a new approach to monitoring CSO frequency that provided a more robust indication of a positive or negative CSO occurrence.Stearns & Wheler developed a simple motion detector system that will continuously monitor and record motion. When this system is installed at the proper elevation in a CSO diversion structure, it can monitor and record when an overflow is occurring. As the combined sewer overflow occurs, the flowing water sets the motion detector into motion. This approach was accepted by the NYS DEC and the motion detector systems were installed on each of the twenty CSO diversion structures.Per acceptance by the NYS DEC, the installation of the motion detectors eliminated the need to inspect the CSOs after every significant rainfall event. The city now downloads data once per month instead of performing inspections after every significant rainfall event. The crews were routinely performing six or seven inspections per month. This simple approach to monitoring CSOs costs the city less money and provides a more conclusive indication of CSO frequency, which is acceptable to the NYS DEC. The cost of the equipment and software was approximately 200 (2008) for each of the twenty CSO diversion structures.
A small Upstate New York city was spending more than 2,500 per month to monitor combined sewer overflow (CSO) frequency. In general the city's procedure was to observe the presence or absence of debris on the CSO weir after each significant rainfall event. The presence of debris indicated CSO activation. During the month, the city would visit each CSO location, record observations and then report...
Author(s)
John J. LaGorgaJoseph H. Dodd
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12 - Infrastructure Risk Assessment and Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:2L.913;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793847537
Volume / Issue2009 / 2
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)913 - 919
Copyright2009
Word count337
Subject keywordsCombined Sewer Overflow (CSO)Flow Monitoring

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
John J. LaGorga# Joseph H. Dodd. Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296624CITANCHOR>.
John J. LaGorga# Joseph H. Dodd. Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296624CITANCHOR.
John J. LaGorga# Joseph H. Dodd
Monitoring CSO Frequency While Saving Money and Reducing Regulatory Risk
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296624CITANCHOR