lastID = -296642
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:14:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:40:31 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 00:56:47 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:56:46 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure

Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure

Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure
Abstract
The complexity of anaerobic digester cleaning has forced numerous utilities to operate their anaerobic digester systems in a run-to-failure mode. The main disadvantage of the run-to-failure approach is that anaerobic digesters are cleaned only after several years of steadily declining process performance. The generally accepted symptoms of a digester requiring cleaning are:Foaming.Unstable operating conditions.Declining volatile solids reduction coupled with a reduction in digester gas production.A reasonable cleaning frequency is once every three to eight years, depending on grit accumulation within the digester, with the digesters losing 20 to 25 percent of volume during this time period. It is recommended that the digesters be cleaned after their fourth year of operation; however, some facilities have been able to extend their operation a few more years before cleaning was required. Monitoring grit accumulation within the digesters once per year after an initial three years of operation will help determine when cleaning is required at the facility.Utilities must also grapple with other cleaning issues that require effective risk mitigation from both known physical concerns (toxic gases, confined space entry and materials handling) and site specific unknowns, including the following:Internal and/or external valve/piping replacement.Digester roof or cover coatings failures.Concrete corrosion.Repair time and/or budget constraints to execute the necessary mechanical and/or structural repairs.Failure analyses of the digester mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation systems, as well as implementation of upgrades and/or replacement, should be considered prior to the execution of a digester cleaning project. Cleaning projects should also include the chemical and/or mechanical cleaning of the various piping systems.Three case studies will be presented including experiences at the Morris Forman Water Quality Treatment Center in Louisville, KY, Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in Greenville, SC, and Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant in Kansas City, MO. These case studies include lessons learned by the owner(s), including cleaning/disposal challenges, challenges to continue operating the facility during the cleaning process, and digester startup once cleaning is completed. The total cost for digester cleaning is presented for each case study, including costs for the contractor to clean the digester, hauling/disposal costs, and repair expenses.
The complexity of anaerobic digester cleaning has forced numerous utilities to operate their anaerobic digester systems in a run-to-failure mode. The main disadvantage of the run-to-failure approach is that anaerobic digesters are cleaned only after several years of steadily declining process performance. The generally accepted symptoms of a digester requiring cleaning are:
Author(s)
Neil MassartRobert BatesRandy BoyetteShaun O'KelleyGary NeunHari Santha
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5 - Anaerobic Digestion 2
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:3L.275;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793846123
Volume / Issue2009 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)275 - 289
Copyright2009
Word count362
Subject keywordsAnaerobic digester cleaningdigester cleaning costsdigester foaming

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296642
Get access
-296642
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure
Abstract
The complexity of anaerobic digester cleaning has forced numerous utilities to operate their anaerobic digester systems in a run-to-failure mode. The main disadvantage of the run-to-failure approach is that anaerobic digesters are cleaned only after several years of steadily declining process performance. The generally accepted symptoms of a digester requiring cleaning are:Foaming.Unstable operating conditions.Declining volatile solids reduction coupled with a reduction in digester gas production.A reasonable cleaning frequency is once every three to eight years, depending on grit accumulation within the digester, with the digesters losing 20 to 25 percent of volume during this time period. It is recommended that the digesters be cleaned after their fourth year of operation; however, some facilities have been able to extend their operation a few more years before cleaning was required. Monitoring grit accumulation within the digesters once per year after an initial three years of operation will help determine when cleaning is required at the facility.Utilities must also grapple with other cleaning issues that require effective risk mitigation from both known physical concerns (toxic gases, confined space entry and materials handling) and site specific unknowns, including the following:Internal and/or external valve/piping replacement.Digester roof or cover coatings failures.Concrete corrosion.Repair time and/or budget constraints to execute the necessary mechanical and/or structural repairs.Failure analyses of the digester mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation systems, as well as implementation of upgrades and/or replacement, should be considered prior to the execution of a digester cleaning project. Cleaning projects should also include the chemical and/or mechanical cleaning of the various piping systems.Three case studies will be presented including experiences at the Morris Forman Water Quality Treatment Center in Louisville, KY, Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in Greenville, SC, and Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant in Kansas City, MO. These case studies include lessons learned by the owner(s), including cleaning/disposal challenges, challenges to continue operating the facility during the cleaning process, and digester startup once cleaning is completed. The total cost for digester cleaning is presented for each case study, including costs for the contractor to clean the digester, hauling/disposal costs, and repair expenses.
The complexity of anaerobic digester cleaning has forced numerous utilities to operate their anaerobic digester systems in a run-to-failure mode. The main disadvantage of the run-to-failure approach is that anaerobic digesters are cleaned only after several years of steadily declining process performance. The generally accepted symptoms of a digester requiring cleaning are:
Author(s)
Neil MassartRobert BatesRandy BoyetteShaun O'KelleyGary NeunHari Santha
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5 - Anaerobic Digestion 2
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:3L.275;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793846123
Volume / Issue2009 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)275 - 289
Copyright2009
Word count362
Subject keywordsAnaerobic digester cleaningdigester cleaning costsdigester foaming

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Neil Massart# Robert Bates# Randy Boyette# Shaun O'Kelley# Gary Neun# Hari Santha. Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296642CITANCHOR>.
Neil Massart# Robert Bates# Randy Boyette# Shaun O'Kelley# Gary Neun# Hari Santha. Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296642CITANCHOR.
Neil Massart# Robert Bates# Randy Boyette# Shaun O'Kelley# Gary Neun# Hari Santha
Lesser of Two Evils – Digester Cleaning or Run to Failure
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296642CITANCHOR