lastID = -296934
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:17:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:17:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:52:39 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:52:38 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process

Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process

Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process
Abstract
On November 27, 2007, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), along with several other environmental interest groups (collectively known as the ‘Petitioners’), submitted a petition to EPA seeking amendments to the secondary treatment requirements for wastewater treatment plants. The Petitioners requested that EPA “fulfill its obligation under the Clean Water Act” by specifying “the degree of effluent reduction attainable at the present time through the application of secondary treatment for nutrient pollution.” The Petitioners suggested that EPA issue nitrogen and phosphorus secondary treatment limitations for wastewater facilities of 0.3 mg/l total phosphorus (TP) and 3.0 mg/l total nitrogen (TN). NRDC's November 27, 2007 petition for rulemaking was premised on the position that 1) nutrients cause ubiquitous impairments in all watersheds, 2) the Clean Water Act requires EPA to update the Secondary Treatment Regulation to address these pollutants, and 3) mandating state-of-the-art nitrogen and phosphorus reduction requirements would not be very costly.
On November 27, 2007, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), along with several other environmental interest groups (collectively known as the ‘Petitioners’), submitted a petition to EPA seeking amendments to the secondary treatment requirements for wastewater treatment plants. The Petitioners requested that EPA “fulfill its obligation under the Clean Water Act” by...
Author(s)
John C. HallPhil RosenmanGary B. Cohen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 113 - Nutrient Issues and Management Options
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:7L.7587;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793899882
Volume / Issue2009 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7587 - 7594
Copyright2009
Word count163
Subject keywordsNutrient RequirementsSecondary TreatmentPetitions for Rulemaking

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296934
Get access
-296934
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process
Abstract
On November 27, 2007, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), along with several other environmental interest groups (collectively known as the ‘Petitioners’), submitted a petition to EPA seeking amendments to the secondary treatment requirements for wastewater treatment plants. The Petitioners requested that EPA “fulfill its obligation under the Clean Water Act” by specifying “the degree of effluent reduction attainable at the present time through the application of secondary treatment for nutrient pollution.” The Petitioners suggested that EPA issue nitrogen and phosphorus secondary treatment limitations for wastewater facilities of 0.3 mg/l total phosphorus (TP) and 3.0 mg/l total nitrogen (TN). NRDC's November 27, 2007 petition for rulemaking was premised on the position that 1) nutrients cause ubiquitous impairments in all watersheds, 2) the Clean Water Act requires EPA to update the Secondary Treatment Regulation to address these pollutants, and 3) mandating state-of-the-art nitrogen and phosphorus reduction requirements would not be very costly.
On November 27, 2007, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), along with several other environmental interest groups (collectively known as the ‘Petitioners’), submitted a petition to EPA seeking amendments to the secondary treatment requirements for wastewater treatment plants. The Petitioners requested that EPA “fulfill its obligation under the Clean Water Act” by...
Author(s)
John C. HallPhil RosenmanGary B. Cohen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 113 - Nutrient Issues and Management Options
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:7L.7587;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793899882
Volume / Issue2009 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7587 - 7594
Copyright2009
Word count163
Subject keywordsNutrient RequirementsSecondary TreatmentPetitions for Rulemaking

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
John C. Hall# Phil Rosenman# Gary B. Cohen. Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296934CITANCHOR>.
John C. Hall# Phil Rosenman# Gary B. Cohen. Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296934CITANCHOR.
John C. Hall# Phil Rosenman# Gary B. Cohen
Evaluation of NRDC Secondary Treatment Rule Petition: End Running the TMDL Process
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296934CITANCHOR