lastID = -297324
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 19:47:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 19:47:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:53:36 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:53:35 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes

Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes

Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes
Abstract
Most households regularly use products containing trace organic compounds (TOrCs), which ultimately end up in municipal wastewater treatment systems. In order to assess the exposure of these compounds to the environment there is a need to evaluate their removal within wastewater treatment systems. Quantitative structure property relationships (QSPR) techniques are potential powerful tools to providing water utilities a means to screen rapidly and accurately the fate of TOrCs during wastewater treatment processes and to assess TOrC risk exposures. This study investigated the evaluation of existing QSPRs applicable for the following wastewater treatment fate processes: sorption to sludge solid phases, transformation during biological activated-sludge treatment, and chlorine oxidation processes. A comprehensive literature review of existing biodegradation, sorption and chlorine oxidation QSPRs was performed. The review was used to assess the applicability of existing QSPRs for wastewater treatment systems and identify which QSPRs warrant evaluation. Selected predictive QSPRs were statistically evaluated using experimental biotransformation, sorption and chlorine oxidation fate parameters reported in the literature and measured in this study during laboratory-batch studies. One-parameter log Kowbased models turned out to be the best sorption QSPR models for neutral compounds. Simplified QSPRs are lacking for ionizable organic compounds. The most commonly employed biodegradation SPRs provide the tendency of biotransformation or biodegradation of an organic compound. The reason for this qualitative assessment is that limited consistent and good-quality biodegradation kinetic data are available. This project evaluated U.S. EPA's qualitative BIOWIN SPR models and EPI Suite's semi-quantitative method for estimating biodegradation half-lives. No single BIOWIN model accurately predicted both biodegradable and nonbiodegradable compounds and the half-life technique was conservative in its approach for the removal of TOrCs. What are still lacking are accurate QSPRs that can estimate quantitatively biotransformation and/or biodegradation rates of TOrCs during activated-sludge treatment. Limited QSPRs exist to assess chlorine oxidation of TOrCs. The reason for this is the limited chlorine oxidation kinetic data available. A few models have been developed, but they are only applicable to specific classes of compounds. One QSPR was evaluated, which reasonably predicted the rate constant for a validation set of phenoxide-ion type of compounds and sulfamethoxazole.
Most households regularly use products containing trace organic compounds (TOrCs), which ultimately end up in municipal wastewater treatment systems. In order to assess the exposure of these compounds to the environment there is a need to evaluate their removal within wastewater treatment systems. Quantitative structure property relationships (QSPR) techniques are potential powerful tools to...
Author(s)
Eric R. V. DickensonJörg E. DrewesJohn Stevens-GarmonStuart KhanJames McDonald
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 60: Treatment of Microconstituents
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:13L.4084;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798181629
Volume / Issue2010 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4084 - 4096
Copyright2010
Word count358
Subject keywordswastewater treatmenttrace organic compoundsemerging organic contaminantsquantitative structure property relationshipsbiotransformationsorptionchlorination

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-297324
Get access
-297324
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes
Abstract
Most households regularly use products containing trace organic compounds (TOrCs), which ultimately end up in municipal wastewater treatment systems. In order to assess the exposure of these compounds to the environment there is a need to evaluate their removal within wastewater treatment systems. Quantitative structure property relationships (QSPR) techniques are potential powerful tools to providing water utilities a means to screen rapidly and accurately the fate of TOrCs during wastewater treatment processes and to assess TOrC risk exposures. This study investigated the evaluation of existing QSPRs applicable for the following wastewater treatment fate processes: sorption to sludge solid phases, transformation during biological activated-sludge treatment, and chlorine oxidation processes. A comprehensive literature review of existing biodegradation, sorption and chlorine oxidation QSPRs was performed. The review was used to assess the applicability of existing QSPRs for wastewater treatment systems and identify which QSPRs warrant evaluation. Selected predictive QSPRs were statistically evaluated using experimental biotransformation, sorption and chlorine oxidation fate parameters reported in the literature and measured in this study during laboratory-batch studies. One-parameter log Kowbased models turned out to be the best sorption QSPR models for neutral compounds. Simplified QSPRs are lacking for ionizable organic compounds. The most commonly employed biodegradation SPRs provide the tendency of biotransformation or biodegradation of an organic compound. The reason for this qualitative assessment is that limited consistent and good-quality biodegradation kinetic data are available. This project evaluated U.S. EPA's qualitative BIOWIN SPR models and EPI Suite's semi-quantitative method for estimating biodegradation half-lives. No single BIOWIN model accurately predicted both biodegradable and nonbiodegradable compounds and the half-life technique was conservative in its approach for the removal of TOrCs. What are still lacking are accurate QSPRs that can estimate quantitatively biotransformation and/or biodegradation rates of TOrCs during activated-sludge treatment. Limited QSPRs exist to assess chlorine oxidation of TOrCs. The reason for this is the limited chlorine oxidation kinetic data available. A few models have been developed, but they are only applicable to specific classes of compounds. One QSPR was evaluated, which reasonably predicted the rate constant for a validation set of phenoxide-ion type of compounds and sulfamethoxazole.
Most households regularly use products containing trace organic compounds (TOrCs), which ultimately end up in municipal wastewater treatment systems. In order to assess the exposure of these compounds to the environment there is a need to evaluate their removal within wastewater treatment systems. Quantitative structure property relationships (QSPR) techniques are potential powerful tools to...
Author(s)
Eric R. V. DickensonJörg E. DrewesJohn Stevens-GarmonStuart KhanJames McDonald
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 60: Treatment of Microconstituents
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:13L.4084;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798181629
Volume / Issue2010 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4084 - 4096
Copyright2010
Word count358
Subject keywordswastewater treatmenttrace organic compoundsemerging organic contaminantsquantitative structure property relationshipsbiotransformationsorptionchlorination

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Eric R. V. Dickenson# Jörg E. Drewes# John Stevens-Garmon# Stuart Khan# James McDonald. Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 24 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-297324CITANCHOR>.
Eric R. V. Dickenson# Jörg E. Drewes# John Stevens-Garmon# Stuart Khan# James McDonald. Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 24, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297324CITANCHOR.
Eric R. V. Dickenson# Jörg E. Drewes# John Stevens-Garmon# Stuart Khan# James McDonald
Evaluation of QSPR Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Processes
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 24, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297324CITANCHOR