lastID = -297830
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:45:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:44:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:20:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:20:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:57:43 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:57:42 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes

The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes

The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes
Abstract
Five Activated Sludge Process (ASP) systems with different side-stream bioreactor (SSR) and digestion schemes were operated in the laboratory to compare biological sludge reduction processes. The five systems are: #1) ASP+AerSSR; #2) ASP+AnaSSR; #3) ASP+aerobic digester; #4) ASP+anaerobic digester; and #5) ASP with no solids wastage. In Phase I, the overall sludge yields of #1(ASP+AerSSR) and #2 (ASP+AnaSSR) was 0.11 and 0.18 mgVSS/mgCOD, respectively. In Phase II, the accounting of biomass in AS+ASSR system revealed that about 54% of sludge is degraded in ASSR while about 46% of sludge is degraded in the ASP. The extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) data showed that base-extractable EPS was much smaller for AS with AnaSSR (#2) than the others. These results indicate that degradation of base-extractable EPS accounts for the lower sludge yield in AS+AnaSSR, and based on the literature these organic pool are believed to be aluminum and/or iron-bound EPS. The overall sludge yield of #1 (ASP+AerSSR) was similar with #2. CER-extractable EPS of #1 was smaller than the others. It is thought that divalent cations associated EPS was degraded through #1. Microbial community data from DGGE analysis showed that there are some common and different microbial cells between side-stream bioreactors and the conventional digesters. This result may suggest that side-stream bioreactors are able to select some unique microbial cells. Further research is underway to study their identification and role and fate in biological sludge reduction system.
Five Activated Sludge Process (ASP) systems with different side-stream bioreactor (SSR) and digestion schemes were operated in the laboratory to compare biological sludge reduction processes. The five systems are: #1) ASP+AerSSR; #2) ASP+AnaSSR; #3) ASP+aerobic digester; #4) ASP+anaerobic digester; and #5) ASP with no solids wastage. In Phase I, the overall sludge yields of #1(ASP+AerSSR) and #2...
Author(s)
Dong-Hyun ChonHee-Sik KimChul Park
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 6: Sludge Minimization and Anaerobic Digestion
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:4L.359;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710802767803
Volume / Issue2010 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)359 - 371
Copyright2010
Word count241
Subject keywordsActivated sludgeaerobic digestionanaerobic digestionEPSside-stream reactoryieldmicrobial community

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-297830
Get access
-297830
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes
Abstract
Five Activated Sludge Process (ASP) systems with different side-stream bioreactor (SSR) and digestion schemes were operated in the laboratory to compare biological sludge reduction processes. The five systems are: #1) ASP+AerSSR; #2) ASP+AnaSSR; #3) ASP+aerobic digester; #4) ASP+anaerobic digester; and #5) ASP with no solids wastage. In Phase I, the overall sludge yields of #1(ASP+AerSSR) and #2 (ASP+AnaSSR) was 0.11 and 0.18 mgVSS/mgCOD, respectively. In Phase II, the accounting of biomass in AS+ASSR system revealed that about 54% of sludge is degraded in ASSR while about 46% of sludge is degraded in the ASP. The extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) data showed that base-extractable EPS was much smaller for AS with AnaSSR (#2) than the others. These results indicate that degradation of base-extractable EPS accounts for the lower sludge yield in AS+AnaSSR, and based on the literature these organic pool are believed to be aluminum and/or iron-bound EPS. The overall sludge yield of #1 (ASP+AerSSR) was similar with #2. CER-extractable EPS of #1 was smaller than the others. It is thought that divalent cations associated EPS was degraded through #1. Microbial community data from DGGE analysis showed that there are some common and different microbial cells between side-stream bioreactors and the conventional digesters. This result may suggest that side-stream bioreactors are able to select some unique microbial cells. Further research is underway to study their identification and role and fate in biological sludge reduction system.
Five Activated Sludge Process (ASP) systems with different side-stream bioreactor (SSR) and digestion schemes were operated in the laboratory to compare biological sludge reduction processes. The five systems are: #1) ASP+AerSSR; #2) ASP+AnaSSR; #3) ASP+aerobic digester; #4) ASP+anaerobic digester; and #5) ASP with no solids wastage. In Phase I, the overall sludge yields of #1(ASP+AerSSR) and #2...
Author(s)
Dong-Hyun ChonHee-Sik KimChul Park
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 6: Sludge Minimization and Anaerobic Digestion
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:4L.359;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710802767803
Volume / Issue2010 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)359 - 371
Copyright2010
Word count241
Subject keywordsActivated sludgeaerobic digestionanaerobic digestionEPSside-stream reactoryieldmicrobial community

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Dong-Hyun Chon# Hee-Sik Kim# Chul Park. The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-297830CITANCHOR>.
Dong-Hyun Chon# Hee-Sik Kim# Chul Park. The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297830CITANCHOR.
Dong-Hyun Chon# Hee-Sik Kim# Chul Park
The Comparison of Biological Sludge Reduction Processes
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297830CITANCHOR