lastID = -297938
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:16:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 20:16:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:26:58 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:26:57 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 00:05:26 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:05:25 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:05:24 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance

Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance

Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance
Abstract
Two different pilot studies were conducted in Southern California over a period of several months to assess operational and water quality performance of nine different MBR systems from various manufacturers. The pilot study, conducted at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLWWTP) in San Diego, CA assessed the performance of six different MBR systems on screened raw wastewater, while another study at the Inland Empire's Utilities Agency (CA) assessed the performance of three new MBR systems on primary effluent. Each of these systems was operated at peak flux for 4 hours per day for 4-6 consecutive days to assess membrane performance. Virus seeding studies were also conducted during peak flux operation to evaluate the capability of the MBRs to reject seeded MS-2 coliphage. When operating at steady state, these MBR systems achieved an effluent BOD concentration of 5.5 to >6.7 logs for fecal coliform bacteria and 2.6 to >5.4 logs for indigenous MS-2 coliphages. When operating at peak flux, seeded MS-2 coliphage removal ranged from 1.0-4.4 logs, respectively. The higher log removal values (LRVs) for indigenous MS-2 coliphage among different MBR systems were probably the result of particle association of indigenous coliphage. Differences in membrane pore size (0.04-0.2 μm) amongst the MBR systems evaluated did not have a substantial impact on indigenous MS-2 coliphage removal, but seeded MS-2 coliphage removal varied among the different MBR systems.
Two different pilot studies were conducted in Southern California over a period of several months to assess operational and water quality performance of nine different MBR systems from various manufacturers. The pilot study, conducted at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLWWTP) in San Diego, CA assessed the performance of six different MBR systems on screened raw wastewater, while...
Author(s)
Zakir HiraniGeno LehmanJames DeCarolisJoseph Jacangelo
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 9: MBR Design
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:5L.416;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798216828
Volume / Issue2010 / 5
Content sourceMembranes Conference
First / last page(s)416 - 433
Copyright2010
Word count237
Subject keywordsmembrane bioreactor (MBR)peak fluxcoliformscoliphagesdisinfectionwater reuse

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-297938
Get access
-297938
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance
Abstract
Two different pilot studies were conducted in Southern California over a period of several months to assess operational and water quality performance of nine different MBR systems from various manufacturers. The pilot study, conducted at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLWWTP) in San Diego, CA assessed the performance of six different MBR systems on screened raw wastewater, while another study at the Inland Empire's Utilities Agency (CA) assessed the performance of three new MBR systems on primary effluent. Each of these systems was operated at peak flux for 4 hours per day for 4-6 consecutive days to assess membrane performance. Virus seeding studies were also conducted during peak flux operation to evaluate the capability of the MBRs to reject seeded MS-2 coliphage. When operating at steady state, these MBR systems achieved an effluent BOD concentration of 5.5 to >6.7 logs for fecal coliform bacteria and 2.6 to >5.4 logs for indigenous MS-2 coliphages. When operating at peak flux, seeded MS-2 coliphage removal ranged from 1.0-4.4 logs, respectively. The higher log removal values (LRVs) for indigenous MS-2 coliphage among different MBR systems were probably the result of particle association of indigenous coliphage. Differences in membrane pore size (0.04-0.2 μm) amongst the MBR systems evaluated did not have a substantial impact on indigenous MS-2 coliphage removal, but seeded MS-2 coliphage removal varied among the different MBR systems.
Two different pilot studies were conducted in Southern California over a period of several months to assess operational and water quality performance of nine different MBR systems from various manufacturers. The pilot study, conducted at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLWWTP) in San Diego, CA assessed the performance of six different MBR systems on screened raw wastewater, while...
Author(s)
Zakir HiraniGeno LehmanJames DeCarolisJoseph Jacangelo
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 9: MBR Design
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:5L.416;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798216828
Volume / Issue2010 / 5
Content sourceMembranes Conference
First / last page(s)416 - 433
Copyright2010
Word count237
Subject keywordsmembrane bioreactor (MBR)peak fluxcoliformscoliphagesdisinfectionwater reuse

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Zakir Hirani# Geno Lehman# James DeCarolis# Joseph Jacangelo. Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-297938CITANCHOR>.
Zakir Hirani# Geno Lehman# James DeCarolis# Joseph Jacangelo. Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297938CITANCHOR.
Zakir Hirani# Geno Lehman# James DeCarolis# Joseph Jacangelo
Impact of Diurnal Peak Flow and Pathogen Loading on MBR Performance
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297938CITANCHOR