lastID = -298044
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 14:58:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 14:58:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:17:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:17:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:04:35 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:04:33 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants

Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants

Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants
Abstract
Research was undertaken to determine the potential for changes in GHG emissions based on the magnitude of aeration, as enhanced by the need for mixing and shearing biofilm (to manage the biofilm thickness), the type of media (fixed bed versus moving bed), and the location of media in IFAS systems. The information was used to verify the biofilm and IFAS components of the Aquifas+ simulator. The simulator was developed with a proprietary algorithm that can achieve speeds greater than 100 times that of other commercial biofilm models, while solving twice as many equations for the biofilm to accommodate GHG simulations. The proprietary elements of the algorithm modify the Newton Raphson method for solving equations and the Euler method for row reduction during matrix inversion in a manner that achieves substantially higher speeds and computational accuracy. The nitrification and denitrification reactions are broken up into four steps each to simulate nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, nitrite and nitrate forms of nitrogen. The oxidized nitrogen products with reactions where both ordinary heterotrophs (OHO), polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) can consume them. This expanded the activated sludge component of IWA-ASM2d from 19 to 54 equations, and the biofilm component from 19 to 34 equations.As part of this research, it was determined that an IFAS system could denitrify better with the biofilm added to the anoxic cell, and the denitrification flux (oxidized-N reduction inside biofilms, especially in thicker biofilms) creates a lower potential for emitting GHG as nitrous oxides in the anoxic zone. The simulator was applied to evaluate and conclude that the higher buffer on air supply in IFAS that is created when the aeration requirements have to satisfy the need for media mixing to shear the biofilm helps achieve more complete nitrification, thereby lowering the potential for GHG emissions. Dynamic simulation with the higher aeration and mixing shows that the more complete nitrification that can be achieved with the additional air and media in a properly designed IFAS system can also reduce the emission of nitrous oxides from the aerobic zone during peak flow periods.
Research was undertaken to determine the potential for changes in GHG emissions based on the magnitude of aeration, as enhanced by the need for mixing and shearing biofilm (to manage the biofilm thickness), the type of media (fixed bed versus moving bed), and the location of media in IFAS systems. The information was used to verify the biofilm and IFAS components of the Aquifas+ simulator. The...
Author(s)
Dipankar SenAdnan LodhiRip CopithornClifford W RandallRichard PehrsonKartik Chandran
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5: Modeling as a Tool for Biofilm Reactor Design and Research
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:7L.389;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798208412
Volume / Issue2010 / 7
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)389 - 400
Copyright2010
Word count369
Subject keywordsGreen House Gas EmissionsSimulatorIFASMedia TypesFixed BedMoving BedAerationActivated SludgeNitrous OxideNitric Oxide

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298044
Get access
-298044
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants
Abstract
Research was undertaken to determine the potential for changes in GHG emissions based on the magnitude of aeration, as enhanced by the need for mixing and shearing biofilm (to manage the biofilm thickness), the type of media (fixed bed versus moving bed), and the location of media in IFAS systems. The information was used to verify the biofilm and IFAS components of the Aquifas+ simulator. The simulator was developed with a proprietary algorithm that can achieve speeds greater than 100 times that of other commercial biofilm models, while solving twice as many equations for the biofilm to accommodate GHG simulations. The proprietary elements of the algorithm modify the Newton Raphson method for solving equations and the Euler method for row reduction during matrix inversion in a manner that achieves substantially higher speeds and computational accuracy. The nitrification and denitrification reactions are broken up into four steps each to simulate nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, nitrite and nitrate forms of nitrogen. The oxidized nitrogen products with reactions where both ordinary heterotrophs (OHO), polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) can consume them. This expanded the activated sludge component of IWA-ASM2d from 19 to 54 equations, and the biofilm component from 19 to 34 equations.As part of this research, it was determined that an IFAS system could denitrify better with the biofilm added to the anoxic cell, and the denitrification flux (oxidized-N reduction inside biofilms, especially in thicker biofilms) creates a lower potential for emitting GHG as nitrous oxides in the anoxic zone. The simulator was applied to evaluate and conclude that the higher buffer on air supply in IFAS that is created when the aeration requirements have to satisfy the need for media mixing to shear the biofilm helps achieve more complete nitrification, thereby lowering the potential for GHG emissions. Dynamic simulation with the higher aeration and mixing shows that the more complete nitrification that can be achieved with the additional air and media in a properly designed IFAS system can also reduce the emission of nitrous oxides from the aerobic zone during peak flow periods.
Research was undertaken to determine the potential for changes in GHG emissions based on the magnitude of aeration, as enhanced by the need for mixing and shearing biofilm (to manage the biofilm thickness), the type of media (fixed bed versus moving bed), and the location of media in IFAS systems. The information was used to verify the biofilm and IFAS components of the Aquifas+ simulator. The...
Author(s)
Dipankar SenAdnan LodhiRip CopithornClifford W RandallRichard PehrsonKartik Chandran
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5: Modeling as a Tool for Biofilm Reactor Design and Research
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:7L.389;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798208412
Volume / Issue2010 / 7
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)389 - 400
Copyright2010
Word count369
Subject keywordsGreen House Gas EmissionsSimulatorIFASMedia TypesFixed BedMoving BedAerationActivated SludgeNitrous OxideNitric Oxide

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Dipankar Sen# Adnan Lodhi# Rip Copithorn# Clifford W Randall# Richard Pehrson# Kartik Chandran. Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298044CITANCHOR>.
Dipankar Sen# Adnan Lodhi# Rip Copithorn# Clifford W Randall# Richard Pehrson# Kartik Chandran. Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298044CITANCHOR.
Dipankar Sen# Adnan Lodhi# Rip Copithorn# Clifford W Randall# Richard Pehrson# Kartik Chandran
Differences in GHG Emissions Between IFAS and Activated Sludge – Developing A Fast and Accurate Computational Model – Aquifas+ – to Simulate Media, Mixing and Aeration, Design and Operation of Plants
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298044CITANCHOR