lastID = -298133
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 20:51:30 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:51:29 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina

Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina

Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina
Abstract
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) enacted the Capacity Use rule on August 1, 2002. The Capacity Use rule was developed as a control measure for groundwater use in the Cretaceous aquifer in response to decreasing groundwater level and saltwater intrusion. The rule specifies a total of 75 percent reduction in groundwater use from the Cretaceous aquifer from an approved base rate. The Town of Farmville (Pitt County), the Town of Winterville (Pitt County), and Greene County currently rely on the Cretaceous aquifer for their sole water supply, and therefore are significantly affected by the CCPCUA rule. These communities plan to purchase bulk finished water from Greenville Utilities to comply with Capacity Use rule and continue to meet customer needs. However, the purchase of bulk finished water from Greenville Utilities to the Town of Farmville and Greene County constitutes an Interbasin transfer (IBT) from the Tar River basin to the Contentnea Creek subbasin. Similarly, the sale of finished water to the Town of Winterville constitutes an IBT from the Tar River basin to the Neuse River subbasin. An Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy was developed to provide a sustainable water supply solution for Greene County, Farmville, and Winterville.North Carolina's IBT regulations require there be a preponderance of benefits relative to detriments for any IBT. Additionally detriments must be mitigated to a reasonable degree. For Greenville Utilities interbasin transfer, the complexities of the tidally influenced river system and conflicting regulatory requirements created challenges in the formulation of an IBT management plan to provide sufficient water resources for all of the communities affected. A detailed analysis of the potential environmental effects of the proposed IBT using hydrologic modeling enabled the development of a management plan that satisfies customer needs, abides by North Carolina regulations, and does not significantly impact the environment.
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) enacted the Capacity Use rule on August 1, 2002. The Capacity Use rule was developed as a control measure for groundwater use in the Cretaceous aquifer in response to decreasing groundwater level and saltwater intrusion. The rule specifies a total of 75 percent reduction in groundwater use from the Cretaceous aquifer from an approved...
Author(s)
Mary SadlerDavid BrileySteve Porter
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 111: Sustainable Water Reuse and Water Supply
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:8L.8094;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798207945
Volume / Issue2010 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)8094 - 8114
Copyright2010
Word count315
Subject keywordsInterbasin TransferPermittingWater SupplyWater WithdrawalHydrologic Modeling

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298133
Get access
-298133
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina
Abstract
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) enacted the Capacity Use rule on August 1, 2002. The Capacity Use rule was developed as a control measure for groundwater use in the Cretaceous aquifer in response to decreasing groundwater level and saltwater intrusion. The rule specifies a total of 75 percent reduction in groundwater use from the Cretaceous aquifer from an approved base rate. The Town of Farmville (Pitt County), the Town of Winterville (Pitt County), and Greene County currently rely on the Cretaceous aquifer for their sole water supply, and therefore are significantly affected by the CCPCUA rule. These communities plan to purchase bulk finished water from Greenville Utilities to comply with Capacity Use rule and continue to meet customer needs. However, the purchase of bulk finished water from Greenville Utilities to the Town of Farmville and Greene County constitutes an Interbasin transfer (IBT) from the Tar River basin to the Contentnea Creek subbasin. Similarly, the sale of finished water to the Town of Winterville constitutes an IBT from the Tar River basin to the Neuse River subbasin. An Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy was developed to provide a sustainable water supply solution for Greene County, Farmville, and Winterville.North Carolina's IBT regulations require there be a preponderance of benefits relative to detriments for any IBT. Additionally detriments must be mitigated to a reasonable degree. For Greenville Utilities interbasin transfer, the complexities of the tidally influenced river system and conflicting regulatory requirements created challenges in the formulation of an IBT management plan to provide sufficient water resources for all of the communities affected. A detailed analysis of the potential environmental effects of the proposed IBT using hydrologic modeling enabled the development of a management plan that satisfies customer needs, abides by North Carolina regulations, and does not significantly impact the environment.
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) enacted the Capacity Use rule on August 1, 2002. The Capacity Use rule was developed as a control measure for groundwater use in the Cretaceous aquifer in response to decreasing groundwater level and saltwater intrusion. The rule specifies a total of 75 percent reduction in groundwater use from the Cretaceous aquifer from an approved...
Author(s)
Mary SadlerDavid BrileySteve Porter
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 111: Sustainable Water Reuse and Water Supply
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:8L.8094;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798207945
Volume / Issue2010 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)8094 - 8114
Copyright2010
Word count315
Subject keywordsInterbasin TransferPermittingWater SupplyWater WithdrawalHydrologic Modeling

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Mary Sadler# David Briley# Steve Porter. Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 12 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298133CITANCHOR>.
Mary Sadler# David Briley# Steve Porter. Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 12, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298133CITANCHOR.
Mary Sadler# David Briley# Steve Porter
Challenges of Developing and Implementing an Interbasin Transfer Management Strategy for Greenville Utilities Commission, North Carolina
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 12, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298133CITANCHOR