lastID = -298221
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 11:40:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:30:05 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:30:04 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:30:03 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying

Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying

Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying
Abstract
Municipal wastewater contains a wide variety of volatile organic compounds that are released during throughout the treatment train. In common practice, instead of natural gas, digester gas is used for economical reasons. This practice raises concern whether this adds to the VOC emissions that could subject the plant to Hazardous Air Pollution (HAP) regulations. The current research was conducted to identify differences between natural gas and digester gas in the Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) when the Drum Drying System (DDS) was operated. The Morris Forman Water Quality Treatment Center (MFWQTC) in Louisville, Kentucky was the experiment site. The DDS was run in two cases: fueled by digester gas and fueled by natural gas. Obtained samples were analyzed at the University of Louisville. The data from these two test cases showed no significant RTO emission differences between fuels. Therefore, it is observed that the use of digester gas instead of natural gas is economical without emitting additional harmful emissions.
Municipal wastewater contains a wide variety of volatile organic compounds that are released during throughout the treatment train. In common practice, instead of natural gas, digester gas is used for economical reasons. This practice raises concern whether this adds to the VOC emissions that could subject the plant to Hazardous Air Pollution (HAP) regulations. The current research was conducted...
Author(s)
Mahyar GhorbanianRobert BatesRussell BarnettJ. P. Mohsen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 84: Odor and Air Emissions Associated With Wastewater Systems
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:10L.5503;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802765994
Volume / Issue2011 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)5503 - 5517
Copyright2011
Word count171
Subject keywordsPollution controlair toxicsdigester gasnatural gasregenerative thermal oxidizeremissionvolatile organic compound (VOC)biosolids

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298221
Get access
-298221
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying
Abstract
Municipal wastewater contains a wide variety of volatile organic compounds that are released during throughout the treatment train. In common practice, instead of natural gas, digester gas is used for economical reasons. This practice raises concern whether this adds to the VOC emissions that could subject the plant to Hazardous Air Pollution (HAP) regulations. The current research was conducted to identify differences between natural gas and digester gas in the Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) when the Drum Drying System (DDS) was operated. The Morris Forman Water Quality Treatment Center (MFWQTC) in Louisville, Kentucky was the experiment site. The DDS was run in two cases: fueled by digester gas and fueled by natural gas. Obtained samples were analyzed at the University of Louisville. The data from these two test cases showed no significant RTO emission differences between fuels. Therefore, it is observed that the use of digester gas instead of natural gas is economical without emitting additional harmful emissions.
Municipal wastewater contains a wide variety of volatile organic compounds that are released during throughout the treatment train. In common practice, instead of natural gas, digester gas is used for economical reasons. This practice raises concern whether this adds to the VOC emissions that could subject the plant to Hazardous Air Pollution (HAP) regulations. The current research was conducted...
Author(s)
Mahyar GhorbanianRobert BatesRussell BarnettJ. P. Mohsen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 84: Odor and Air Emissions Associated With Wastewater Systems
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:10L.5503;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802765994
Volume / Issue2011 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)5503 - 5517
Copyright2011
Word count171
Subject keywordsPollution controlair toxicsdigester gasnatural gasregenerative thermal oxidizeremissionvolatile organic compound (VOC)biosolids

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Mahyar Ghorbanian# Robert Bates# Russell Barnett# J. P. Mohsen. Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 5 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298221CITANCHOR>.
Mahyar Ghorbanian# Robert Bates# Russell Barnett# J. P. Mohsen. Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 5, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298221CITANCHOR.
Mahyar Ghorbanian# Robert Bates# Russell Barnett# J. P. Mohsen
Emissions Comparison of Natural Gas Usage and Digester Gas Usage in Biosolids Drying
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 5, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298221CITANCHOR