lastID = -298401
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 13:00:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 13:00:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:21:18 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:21:17 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:21:16 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams

MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams

MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams
Abstract
Several considerations enter into determining whether a Membrane Bioreactor or Sequencing Batch Reactor is more suitable for nitrification of a high strength wastewater. Landfill leachate is a very common high strength wastewater found throughout the US and across the globe that is comparable to many industrial wastes. High COD, extremely high ammonia levels, and significant total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations are seen at many landfills. Traditionally in most of the US, these wastes have been hauled or pumped to POTWs for disposal. Permit nutrient limitations on POTW discharges have tightened, requiring many landfills to employ pretreatment for indirect discharge or secondary treatment (or more) for direct discharge. The selection of the proper treatment technology for these types of wastestreams requires careful consideration.In the past decade or two, Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) and Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) have become popular activated sludge technologies. When applied to treating unusual strength wastewaters like leachates, the strengths and weaknesses of these treatment approaches provide opportunities for designers. SBRs are simpler and have a longer track record, but MBRs provide an answer to sludge quality and biomass inventory issues that often arise.This paper presents some of the key considerations and lessons learned from designing and operating single-sludge systems that nitrify high strength wastes based on more than a decade of experience with numerous landfill leachates. This experience nitrifying leachates can be applied to other high strength wastewaters just as experience nitrifying high strength industrial wastewaters can be applied to leachates.
Several considerations enter into determining whether a Membrane Bioreactor or Sequencing Batch Reactor is more suitable for nitrification of a high strength wastewater. Landfill leachate is a very common high strength wastewater found throughout the US and across the globe that is comparable to many industrial wastes. High COD, extremely high ammonia levels, and significant total dissolved solids...
Author(s)
Pete A. ShackDennis E. Purschwitz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 55: Treatment Technologies for Landfill Leachate
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:13L.3352;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802721578
Volume / Issue2011 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3352 - 3361
Copyright2011
Word count254

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298401
Get access
-298401
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams
Abstract
Several considerations enter into determining whether a Membrane Bioreactor or Sequencing Batch Reactor is more suitable for nitrification of a high strength wastewater. Landfill leachate is a very common high strength wastewater found throughout the US and across the globe that is comparable to many industrial wastes. High COD, extremely high ammonia levels, and significant total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations are seen at many landfills. Traditionally in most of the US, these wastes have been hauled or pumped to POTWs for disposal. Permit nutrient limitations on POTW discharges have tightened, requiring many landfills to employ pretreatment for indirect discharge or secondary treatment (or more) for direct discharge. The selection of the proper treatment technology for these types of wastestreams requires careful consideration.In the past decade or two, Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) and Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) have become popular activated sludge technologies. When applied to treating unusual strength wastewaters like leachates, the strengths and weaknesses of these treatment approaches provide opportunities for designers. SBRs are simpler and have a longer track record, but MBRs provide an answer to sludge quality and biomass inventory issues that often arise.This paper presents some of the key considerations and lessons learned from designing and operating single-sludge systems that nitrify high strength wastes based on more than a decade of experience with numerous landfill leachates. This experience nitrifying leachates can be applied to other high strength wastewaters just as experience nitrifying high strength industrial wastewaters can be applied to leachates.
Several considerations enter into determining whether a Membrane Bioreactor or Sequencing Batch Reactor is more suitable for nitrification of a high strength wastewater. Landfill leachate is a very common high strength wastewater found throughout the US and across the globe that is comparable to many industrial wastes. High COD, extremely high ammonia levels, and significant total dissolved solids...
Author(s)
Pete A. ShackDennis E. Purschwitz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 55: Treatment Technologies for Landfill Leachate
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:13L.3352;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802721578
Volume / Issue2011 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3352 - 3361
Copyright2011
Word count254

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Pete A. Shack# Dennis E. Purschwitz. MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298401CITANCHOR>.
Pete A. Shack# Dennis E. Purschwitz. MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 1, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298401CITANCHOR.
Pete A. Shack# Dennis E. Purschwitz
MBR vs SBR for Ammonia Removal in High Strength Wastestreams
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 1, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298401CITANCHOR