lastID = -298405
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 13:01:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:55:17 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:55:16 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:55:15 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?

How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?

How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?
Abstract
Control of the solids retention time in secondary treatment has been proposed as a strategy for enhancing biodegradation to improve removal of microconstituents (MCS) such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using fate modeling, the effectiveness of SRT control for eliminating a variety of MCs during wastewater treatment, using three calibrated wastewater treatment plant configurations from Ontario, Canada. A suite of five target MCs, exhibiting a range of hydrophobic and biodegradable characteristics was selected for testing the effect of SRT on their elimination during wastewater treatment using the TOXCHEM predictive fate model. Mixed liquor suspended solids, waste activated sludge (WAS) suspended solids and WAS wasting rates were modified in the existing model layouts to provide the appropriate HRT and SRT values.The modeling results indicate that increasing SRT alone will not always be effective for enhancing biodegradation to eliminate MCs. Because the kinetics of biodegradation are not only dependent on the biomass concentration and population, as reflected by SRT, but also on the time available for biodegradation to occur, both hydraulic retention time and SRT in the biological reactor need to be assessed to maximize the contribution of biodegradation to overall contaminant removal. For some MCs, a higher HRT for the biological process may be as important as the SRT. The relative importance of SRT and HRT for eliminating MCs from treated effluents appears to depend on the physical, chemical and biological properties of the individual MCs.
Control of the solids retention time in secondary treatment has been proposed as a strategy for enhancing biodegradation to improve removal of microconstituents (MCS) such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using fate modeling, the effectiveness of SRT control for eliminating a variety of MCs during wastewater treatment, using three calibrated...
Author(s)
Hugh MonteithHank Andres
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 56: Treatment of Industrial Wastewater in POTWs
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:13L.3416;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802721550
Volume / Issue2011 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3416 - 3429
Copyright2011
Word count252
Subject keywordsSRTmodelHRTmicroconstituentscarbamazepinetriclosanHHCB17β–estradiolBDE99

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298405
Get access
-298405
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?
Abstract
Control of the solids retention time in secondary treatment has been proposed as a strategy for enhancing biodegradation to improve removal of microconstituents (MCS) such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using fate modeling, the effectiveness of SRT control for eliminating a variety of MCs during wastewater treatment, using three calibrated wastewater treatment plant configurations from Ontario, Canada. A suite of five target MCs, exhibiting a range of hydrophobic and biodegradable characteristics was selected for testing the effect of SRT on their elimination during wastewater treatment using the TOXCHEM predictive fate model. Mixed liquor suspended solids, waste activated sludge (WAS) suspended solids and WAS wasting rates were modified in the existing model layouts to provide the appropriate HRT and SRT values.The modeling results indicate that increasing SRT alone will not always be effective for enhancing biodegradation to eliminate MCs. Because the kinetics of biodegradation are not only dependent on the biomass concentration and population, as reflected by SRT, but also on the time available for biodegradation to occur, both hydraulic retention time and SRT in the biological reactor need to be assessed to maximize the contribution of biodegradation to overall contaminant removal. For some MCs, a higher HRT for the biological process may be as important as the SRT. The relative importance of SRT and HRT for eliminating MCs from treated effluents appears to depend on the physical, chemical and biological properties of the individual MCs.
Control of the solids retention time in secondary treatment has been proposed as a strategy for enhancing biodegradation to improve removal of microconstituents (MCS) such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using fate modeling, the effectiveness of SRT control for eliminating a variety of MCs during wastewater treatment, using three calibrated...
Author(s)
Hugh MonteithHank Andres
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 56: Treatment of Industrial Wastewater in POTWs
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:13L.3416;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802721550
Volume / Issue2011 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3416 - 3429
Copyright2011
Word count252
Subject keywordsSRTmodelHRTmicroconstituentscarbamazepinetriclosanHHCB17β–estradiolBDE99

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Hugh Monteith# Hank Andres. How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298405CITANCHOR>.
Hugh Monteith# Hank Andres. How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298405CITANCHOR.
Hugh Monteith# Hank Andres
How Effective is SRT Control for Eliminating Microconstituents?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298405CITANCHOR