lastID = -298536
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Aeration Improvements to Save Energy
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 11:14:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 11:14:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:23:16 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:23:15 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Aeration Improvements to Save Energy

Aeration Improvements to Save Energy

Aeration Improvements to Save Energy

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Aeration Improvements to Save Energy
Abstract
The City of San Jose at its San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant has embarked on a series of projects to reduce energe consumption and provide operational savings, and aeration system upgrading is one of the key projects. The plant was converted in 2000 from a coarse bubble, cross-roll in 2000 to fine bubble membrane tube diffusers, which produced significant savings. In 2009 a second project was initiated to develop an even more cost effective alternative using a greater number of diffusers in slightly different geometries. Off-gas testing was performed to confirm aeration efficiency. An economic analysis was used to determine the most cost effective alternative. Upgrading the original year-2000 retrofit with diffusers having more active surface area provided a pay back of approximately one year. The economic analysis also confirmed that the decision to upgrade the original coarse bubble system with fine bubble diffusers was sound and would provide a payback of 3 to 6 months using current costs, One counter-institutive result was the inadequacy of the original coarse bubble diffuser air piping. The in-tank headers were able to provide even air distribution for coarse bubble diffusers but were unable to do so with fine pore diffusers, which operate at much lower air flow rate. Upgrading options are continuing and addional energy conservation activities will occur.
The City of San Jose at its San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant has embarked on a series of projects to reduce energe consumption and provide operational savings, and aeration system upgrading is one of the key projects. The plant was converted in 2000 from a coarse bubble, cross-roll in 2000 to fine bubble membrane tube diffusers, which produced significant savings. In 2009 a...
Author(s)
Stephanie VermandeRong LiuAlex EksterMichael K. Stenstrom
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 38: Energy Conservation: Aeration, Blowers and Control Systems
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:15L.2192;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802713522
Volume / Issue2011 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)2192 - 2201
Copyright2011
Word count223
Subject keywordsAerationenergy savingfine bubble diffusersoxygen transfer efficiencyreturn on investment

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Aeration Improvements to Save Energy'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Aeration Improvements to Save Energy
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298536
Get access
-298536
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Aeration Improvements to Save Energy'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Aeration Improvements to Save Energy
Abstract
The City of San Jose at its San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant has embarked on a series of projects to reduce energe consumption and provide operational savings, and aeration system upgrading is one of the key projects. The plant was converted in 2000 from a coarse bubble, cross-roll in 2000 to fine bubble membrane tube diffusers, which produced significant savings. In 2009 a second project was initiated to develop an even more cost effective alternative using a greater number of diffusers in slightly different geometries. Off-gas testing was performed to confirm aeration efficiency. An economic analysis was used to determine the most cost effective alternative. Upgrading the original year-2000 retrofit with diffusers having more active surface area provided a pay back of approximately one year. The economic analysis also confirmed that the decision to upgrade the original coarse bubble system with fine bubble diffusers was sound and would provide a payback of 3 to 6 months using current costs, One counter-institutive result was the inadequacy of the original coarse bubble diffuser air piping. The in-tank headers were able to provide even air distribution for coarse bubble diffusers but were unable to do so with fine pore diffusers, which operate at much lower air flow rate. Upgrading options are continuing and addional energy conservation activities will occur.
The City of San Jose at its San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant has embarked on a series of projects to reduce energe consumption and provide operational savings, and aeration system upgrading is one of the key projects. The plant was converted in 2000 from a coarse bubble, cross-roll in 2000 to fine bubble membrane tube diffusers, which produced significant savings. In 2009 a...
Author(s)
Stephanie VermandeRong LiuAlex EksterMichael K. Stenstrom
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 38: Energy Conservation: Aeration, Blowers and Control Systems
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:15L.2192;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802713522
Volume / Issue2011 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)2192 - 2201
Copyright2011
Word count223
Subject keywordsAerationenergy savingfine bubble diffusersoxygen transfer efficiencyreturn on investment

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Stephanie Vermande# Rong Liu# Alex Ekster# Michael K. Stenstrom. Aeration Improvements to Save Energy. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 12 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298536CITANCHOR>.
Stephanie Vermande# Rong Liu# Alex Ekster# Michael K. Stenstrom. Aeration Improvements to Save Energy. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 12, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298536CITANCHOR.
Stephanie Vermande# Rong Liu# Alex Ekster# Michael K. Stenstrom
Aeration Improvements to Save Energy
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 12, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298536CITANCHOR