lastID = -298771
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 14:53:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 14:52:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:01:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 02:05:52 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:05:51 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:05:50 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule

Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule

Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
Abstract
EPA's Proposed Rule containing nutrient criteria for the state of Florida could lead to more stringent effluent limits for two facilities operated by the Clay County Utility Authority (CCUA). These facilities are covered under the state's APRICOT Act, which promotes water reuse and allows for the permitting of backup discharges to surface waters for reuse systems that provide advanced waste treatment. A series of technical analyses were conducted in support of providing formal comments on the Proposed Rule for CCUA. Results of these analyses show that: 1) neither of the CCUA APRICOT Act discharges is predicted to cause an exceedance of the Instream Protection for Values nitrogen or phosphorus contained in the Proposed Rule; 2) the discharges from these facilities typically occur during high flow and/or cold weather conditions when nutrient impacts are expected to be lowest; and 3) and the large majority of the discharged nitrogen will be transported to the Atlantic Ocean prior to be converted into a biologically available form. The CCUA discharges occur on low flow streams that represent the lower end of the spectrum of assimilative capacity. The absence of adverse nutrient impacts from these APRICOT Act discharges on streams with limited assimilative capacity provides supporting evidence that APRICOT Act discharges under the new criteria should not be subject to more stringent treatment requirements than they are already required to apply.
EPA's Proposed Rule containing nutrient criteria for the state of Florida could lead to more stringent effluent limits for two facilities operated by the Clay County Utility Authority (CCUA). These facilities are covered under the state's APRICOT Act, which promotes water reuse and allows for the permitting of backup discharges to surface waters for reuse systems that provide advanced waste...
Author(s)
David DilksJoseph HelfandPenelope Moskus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:2L.1;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802865074
Volume / Issue2011 / 2
Content sourceImpaired Waters Symposium
First / last page(s)1 - 10
Copyright2011
Word count242
Subject keywordsNutrient criteriaAPRICOT Act

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298771
Get access
-298771
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
Abstract
EPA's Proposed Rule containing nutrient criteria for the state of Florida could lead to more stringent effluent limits for two facilities operated by the Clay County Utility Authority (CCUA). These facilities are covered under the state's APRICOT Act, which promotes water reuse and allows for the permitting of backup discharges to surface waters for reuse systems that provide advanced waste treatment. A series of technical analyses were conducted in support of providing formal comments on the Proposed Rule for CCUA. Results of these analyses show that: 1) neither of the CCUA APRICOT Act discharges is predicted to cause an exceedance of the Instream Protection for Values nitrogen or phosphorus contained in the Proposed Rule; 2) the discharges from these facilities typically occur during high flow and/or cold weather conditions when nutrient impacts are expected to be lowest; and 3) and the large majority of the discharged nitrogen will be transported to the Atlantic Ocean prior to be converted into a biologically available form. The CCUA discharges occur on low flow streams that represent the lower end of the spectrum of assimilative capacity. The absence of adverse nutrient impacts from these APRICOT Act discharges on streams with limited assimilative capacity provides supporting evidence that APRICOT Act discharges under the new criteria should not be subject to more stringent treatment requirements than they are already required to apply.
EPA's Proposed Rule containing nutrient criteria for the state of Florida could lead to more stringent effluent limits for two facilities operated by the Clay County Utility Authority (CCUA). These facilities are covered under the state's APRICOT Act, which promotes water reuse and allows for the permitting of backup discharges to surface waters for reuse systems that provide advanced waste...
Author(s)
David DilksJoseph HelfandPenelope Moskus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:2L.1;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802865074
Volume / Issue2011 / 2
Content sourceImpaired Waters Symposium
First / last page(s)1 - 10
Copyright2011
Word count242
Subject keywordsNutrient criteriaAPRICOT Act

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
David Dilks# Joseph Helfand# Penelope Moskus. Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298771CITANCHOR>.
David Dilks# Joseph Helfand# Penelope Moskus. Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298771CITANCHOR.
David Dilks# Joseph Helfand# Penelope Moskus
Nutrient Impacts of Florida APRICOT Act Discharges: Case Study of Potential Impacts of Florida Nutrient Rule
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298771CITANCHOR