lastID = -298911
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:08:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 15:08:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:15:46 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:53:44 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:53:43 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints

Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints

Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints
Abstract
While carbon accounting efforts for wastewater processes often focus primarily on carbon dioxide emissions related to energy use, published literature of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions indicates that methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have the potential to significantly alter carbon footprints associated with biosolids management. With global warming potentials (GWP) of 21 and 310, respectively, even relatively small emissions of CH4 and N2O need to be taken into account when determining biosolids-related GHG emissions. Fugitive CH4 emissions from biosolids placed in landfills and from leaky anaerobic digesters can account for larger carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) debits than the emissions associated with transporting biosolids or heating digesters. Similarly, relatively small emissions of N2O gas from incineration or poorly managed composting operations can have a substantial impact on total GHG emissions.A GHG emissions calculator, referred to as the Biosolids Emissions Assessment Model, or BEAM, was developed for the Canadian Council of the Ministers of the Environment (CCME) based on an extensive review of current greenhouse gas emissions literature (download available from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/es101210k). Use of the model allows for apples to apples comparisons of the impact of biosolids management strategies on overall GHG emissions. The model also allows decision-makers to investigate changes in biosolids management operations that could lower GHG emissions. Results from applications of the BEAM model suggest that maximizing the potential offsets inherent in biosolids, including energy capture and fertilizer and carbon sequestration value, while minimizing fugitive CH4 and N2O emissions associated with biosolids management practices, such as landfilling, low temperature combustion, or improper biosolids stockpiling, can significantly decrease the GHG emissions from biosolids management programs.
While carbon accounting efforts for wastewater processes often focus primarily on carbon dioxide emissions related to energy use, published literature of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions indicates that methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have the potential to significantly alter carbon footprints associated with biosolids...
Author(s)
Andrew CarpenterSally BrownNed Beecher
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 11: Greenhouse Gas & Sustainability
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:4L.708;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802863256
Volume / Issue2011 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)708 - 716
Copyright2011
Word count277
Subject keywordsGreenhouse gas emissionscarbon dioxidemethanenitrous oxideanaerobic digestioncombustionland applicationcompostingcarbon accountingbiosolids management

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298911
Get access
-298911
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints
Abstract
While carbon accounting efforts for wastewater processes often focus primarily on carbon dioxide emissions related to energy use, published literature of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions indicates that methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have the potential to significantly alter carbon footprints associated with biosolids management. With global warming potentials (GWP) of 21 and 310, respectively, even relatively small emissions of CH4 and N2O need to be taken into account when determining biosolids-related GHG emissions. Fugitive CH4 emissions from biosolids placed in landfills and from leaky anaerobic digesters can account for larger carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) debits than the emissions associated with transporting biosolids or heating digesters. Similarly, relatively small emissions of N2O gas from incineration or poorly managed composting operations can have a substantial impact on total GHG emissions.A GHG emissions calculator, referred to as the Biosolids Emissions Assessment Model, or BEAM, was developed for the Canadian Council of the Ministers of the Environment (CCME) based on an extensive review of current greenhouse gas emissions literature (download available from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/es101210k). Use of the model allows for apples to apples comparisons of the impact of biosolids management strategies on overall GHG emissions. The model also allows decision-makers to investigate changes in biosolids management operations that could lower GHG emissions. Results from applications of the BEAM model suggest that maximizing the potential offsets inherent in biosolids, including energy capture and fertilizer and carbon sequestration value, while minimizing fugitive CH4 and N2O emissions associated with biosolids management practices, such as landfilling, low temperature combustion, or improper biosolids stockpiling, can significantly decrease the GHG emissions from biosolids management programs.
While carbon accounting efforts for wastewater processes often focus primarily on carbon dioxide emissions related to energy use, published literature of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions indicates that methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have the potential to significantly alter carbon footprints associated with biosolids...
Author(s)
Andrew CarpenterSally BrownNed Beecher
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 11: Greenhouse Gas & Sustainability
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:4L.708;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802863256
Volume / Issue2011 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)708 - 716
Copyright2011
Word count277
Subject keywordsGreenhouse gas emissionscarbon dioxidemethanenitrous oxideanaerobic digestioncombustionland applicationcompostingcarbon accountingbiosolids management

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Andrew Carpenter# Sally Brown# Ned Beecher. Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298911CITANCHOR>.
Andrew Carpenter# Sally Brown# Ned Beecher. Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298911CITANCHOR.
Andrew Carpenter# Sally Brown# Ned Beecher
Hot and Cold: Potential Impacts from Biosolids Management Options on Carbon Footprints
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298911CITANCHOR