lastID = -298916
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:45:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:45:58 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:15:41 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:15:40 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:12:13 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:12:12 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration

The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration

The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration
Abstract
Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in the incineration of biosolids, especially with regard to fluidized bed incineration. The recent installation of a fluidized bed incineration facility at the Mill Creek wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Cincinnati, Ohio is a good example of what makes this technology so attractive. As part of the plant's current solids handling and processing improvement plan, three new fluidized bed incinerators were recently installed to replace six aging multiple hearth incinerators. Each of the new incinerators is rated to process 96 dry tons per day of biosolids, providing the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (MSDGC) with enough firm capacity to process all biosolids produced at the Mill Creek plant plus up to 82 dry tons per day of additional biosolids from other plants within the District.This paper presents the key factors that led to the decision to install the new incinerators. It also presents actual operational data for comparison between the old multiple hearth incinerators and the new fluidized bed incinerators. This paper will be of value to those who are considering fluidized bed incineration as part of their biosolids management approach. In particular this paper will be of interest to incinerator operators considering the fate of their aging multiple hearth incinerators in light of the current emphasis on reducing fossil fuel use, the desire to be “greener”, and the need to meet stricter emissions control requirements proposed by the USEPA through reclassification of biosolids as solid waste.The Mill Creek WWTP has an average flow of 130 million gallons per day and serves the City of Cincinnati and central Hamilton County. The plant began operation in 1959 and was originally equipped with multiple hearth incinerators. After two major upgrades over the years, the units had reached the end of their useful service life. In addition to increasingly high maintenance and operation costs, it was recognized that the multiple hearth incinerators were no longer meeting the expectations of the community with respect to air emissions and fuel efficiency.The District considered several alternatives for biosolids disposal before ultimately selecting fluidized bed incineration as a replacement for the multiple hearth incineration process. Basedon a life cycle cost analysis and the evaluation of non-economic criteria such as reliability and community awareness, fluidized bed incineration was shown to be the best fit for the District as compared to other biosolids management approaches. As part of this selection, energy recovery from the incinerator exhaust gas for power generation was also evaluated. Given the large capital and operational investment required for waste heat boilers, steam systems, and steam turbine equipment, and the relatively low electric utility rates of this region, the District elected to defer the addition of power generation at that time.Now that the incinerators are operational, actual data for operations costs, emission test results, and carbon footprint have become available for evaluation. Recent test results demonstrate that the new incinerators produce emissions that are in compliance with their air permits and, in some aspects, are significantly less than required limits. Total filterable particulates (PM), for example, have been reduced by over 92 percent compared to previous emissions. The District is also mindful of the potential for changes in regulations, and has included provisions for the addition of mercury removal from exhaust gas using carbon adsorption.With properly dewatered feed material, which is currently achieved by centrifuge dewatering at this plant, the new fluidized bed incinerators can operate autogenously, substantially reducing fossil fuel usage compared to the multiple hearth incinerators that they replaced. Data comparing fuel consumption and carbon footprints for both technologies will also be presented in this paper.The investment made by the District in its new solids processing facility is a testament to the reliability, efficiency, and environmental friendliness of fluidized bed incineration.
Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in the incineration of biosolids, especially with regard to fluidized bed incineration. The recent installation of a fluidized bed incineration facility at the Mill Creek wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Cincinnati, Ohio is a good example of what makes this technology so attractive. As part of the plant's current solids handling and processing...
Author(s)
Ryan WelshDon LinnMelissa HolscherScott ReedJim RowanJim Welp
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12: Thermal Processes - Incineration
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:4L.796;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802863111
Volume / Issue2011 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)796 - 811
Copyright2011
Word count643
Subject keywordsIncinerationfluidized bedmultiple hearthemissionscarbon footprintautogenousfossil fuel

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298916
Get access
-298916
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration
Abstract
Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in the incineration of biosolids, especially with regard to fluidized bed incineration. The recent installation of a fluidized bed incineration facility at the Mill Creek wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Cincinnati, Ohio is a good example of what makes this technology so attractive. As part of the plant's current solids handling and processing improvement plan, three new fluidized bed incinerators were recently installed to replace six aging multiple hearth incinerators. Each of the new incinerators is rated to process 96 dry tons per day of biosolids, providing the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (MSDGC) with enough firm capacity to process all biosolids produced at the Mill Creek plant plus up to 82 dry tons per day of additional biosolids from other plants within the District.This paper presents the key factors that led to the decision to install the new incinerators. It also presents actual operational data for comparison between the old multiple hearth incinerators and the new fluidized bed incinerators. This paper will be of value to those who are considering fluidized bed incineration as part of their biosolids management approach. In particular this paper will be of interest to incinerator operators considering the fate of their aging multiple hearth incinerators in light of the current emphasis on reducing fossil fuel use, the desire to be “greener”, and the need to meet stricter emissions control requirements proposed by the USEPA through reclassification of biosolids as solid waste.The Mill Creek WWTP has an average flow of 130 million gallons per day and serves the City of Cincinnati and central Hamilton County. The plant began operation in 1959 and was originally equipped with multiple hearth incinerators. After two major upgrades over the years, the units had reached the end of their useful service life. In addition to increasingly high maintenance and operation costs, it was recognized that the multiple hearth incinerators were no longer meeting the expectations of the community with respect to air emissions and fuel efficiency.The District considered several alternatives for biosolids disposal before ultimately selecting fluidized bed incineration as a replacement for the multiple hearth incineration process. Basedon a life cycle cost analysis and the evaluation of non-economic criteria such as reliability and community awareness, fluidized bed incineration was shown to be the best fit for the District as compared to other biosolids management approaches. As part of this selection, energy recovery from the incinerator exhaust gas for power generation was also evaluated. Given the large capital and operational investment required for waste heat boilers, steam systems, and steam turbine equipment, and the relatively low electric utility rates of this region, the District elected to defer the addition of power generation at that time.Now that the incinerators are operational, actual data for operations costs, emission test results, and carbon footprint have become available for evaluation. Recent test results demonstrate that the new incinerators produce emissions that are in compliance with their air permits and, in some aspects, are significantly less than required limits. Total filterable particulates (PM), for example, have been reduced by over 92 percent compared to previous emissions. The District is also mindful of the potential for changes in regulations, and has included provisions for the addition of mercury removal from exhaust gas using carbon adsorption.With properly dewatered feed material, which is currently achieved by centrifuge dewatering at this plant, the new fluidized bed incinerators can operate autogenously, substantially reducing fossil fuel usage compared to the multiple hearth incinerators that they replaced. Data comparing fuel consumption and carbon footprints for both technologies will also be presented in this paper.The investment made by the District in its new solids processing facility is a testament to the reliability, efficiency, and environmental friendliness of fluidized bed incineration.
Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in the incineration of biosolids, especially with regard to fluidized bed incineration. The recent installation of a fluidized bed incineration facility at the Mill Creek wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Cincinnati, Ohio is a good example of what makes this technology so attractive. As part of the plant's current solids handling and processing...
Author(s)
Ryan WelshDon LinnMelissa HolscherScott ReedJim RowanJim Welp
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12: Thermal Processes - Incineration
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:4L.796;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802863111
Volume / Issue2011 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)796 - 811
Copyright2011
Word count643
Subject keywordsIncinerationfluidized bedmultiple hearthemissionscarbon footprintautogenousfossil fuel

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Ryan Welsh# Don Linn# Melissa Holscher# Scott Reed# Jim Rowan# Jim Welp. The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 27 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298916CITANCHOR>.
Ryan Welsh# Don Linn# Melissa Holscher# Scott Reed# Jim Rowan# Jim Welp. The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed August 27, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298916CITANCHOR.
Ryan Welsh# Don Linn# Melissa Holscher# Scott Reed# Jim Rowan# Jim Welp
The Greener Solution to Biosolids Incineration: Cincinnati's Switch from Multiple Hearth to Fluidized Bed Incineration
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
August 27, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298916CITANCHOR