lastID = -298941
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 14:55:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:15:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:26:21 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:26:20 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:26:19 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options

Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options

Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options
Abstract
Nitrogen-based fertilizers for agriculture require energy-intensive production of ammonia, which may then be converted to urea or other fertilizer products. The nitrogen mineralizes more quickly than the rate of plant uptake, resulting in nitrate loss as leachate, runoff, and volatilized as nitrogen gas and nitrous oxide. Biosolids products mineralize more slowly, so a higher percentage of their nitrogen is plant-available, but, since biosolids products have relatively low initial nitrogen content, they are applied as soil conditioners, requiring supplemental nitrogen. The VitAg process treats biosolids in a high temperature reaction of ammonia and sulfuric acid to produce a controlled-release nitrogen release fertilizer that is also rich in organic matter. The end product meets Class A pathogen reduction requirements and provides 14-17% controlled- release nitrogen.The paper describes the VitAg process and presents a methodology for tracking energy consumption through the fertilizer lifecycle, beginning with ammonia production and following through to plant nitrogen uptake and losses. Inputs are normalized on the basis of tons of plant available nitrogen, as measured by plant tissue analysis. Nitrogen uptake and loss entries are based on literature searches of field trials including the WERF study Estimating Plant Available Nutrients in Biosolids, field trials for rice, citrus, and field crops using a process similar to VitAg, and on other published sources. It is concluded from this literature review that biosolids-based fertilizers including VitAg provide approximately 1.7 times as much plant-available nitrogen (PAN) as inorganic fertilizers.As a result, the VitAg process uses approximately 31 percent less energy to deliver the same quantity PAN than inorganic fertilizers.Greenhouse gas emissions are affected by energy consumption, nitrous oxide volatilization at the point of application, and carbon sequestration offsets. Greenhouse gas emissions are tracked as equivalent tonnages of carbon dioxide per ton of PAN. The results show that the net greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production and application of the VitAg product are about 40 percent less than with an inorganic fertilizer delivering an equivalent amount of plant-available nitrogen.Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are compared for the following Class A biosolids management alternatives:Class A lime stabilization with heat stage for pathogen reduction:Thermal drying to produce either a soil conditioner or a fertilizer ingredient:Aerated static pile composting: andThe VitAg process.Because of the high energy and greenhouse gas cost of ammonia production, the ‘bottom line’ results of comparing options a), b), and c) is highly sensitive to the assumed percentage of plant availability of nitrogen. Percentage of plant availability is highly variable, determined by crop, climate, and other specifics. When considering the lower amount of ammonia required to deliver a specific amount of plant-available nitrogen the VitAg process has lower net energy and greenhouse impacts per dry ton of biosolids processed than the alternatives.
Nitrogen-based fertilizers for agriculture require energy-intensive production of ammonia, which may then be converted to urea or other fertilizer products. The nitrogen mineralizes more quickly than the rate of plant uptake, resulting in nitrate loss as leachate, runoff, and volatilized as nitrogen gas and nitrous oxide. Biosolids products mineralize more slowly, so a higher percentage of their...
Author(s)
Mark GouldJohn F. DonovanJeffrey C. BurnhamGary L. Dahms
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 17: Bioenergy IV
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:4L.1084;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802862491
Volume / Issue2011 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)1084 - 1102
Copyright2011
Word count469
Subject keywordscontrolled-release fertilizerbiosolidsVitAgUnity Fertilizergreenhouse gas emissions

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298941
Get access
-298941
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options
Abstract
Nitrogen-based fertilizers for agriculture require energy-intensive production of ammonia, which may then be converted to urea or other fertilizer products. The nitrogen mineralizes more quickly than the rate of plant uptake, resulting in nitrate loss as leachate, runoff, and volatilized as nitrogen gas and nitrous oxide. Biosolids products mineralize more slowly, so a higher percentage of their nitrogen is plant-available, but, since biosolids products have relatively low initial nitrogen content, they are applied as soil conditioners, requiring supplemental nitrogen. The VitAg process treats biosolids in a high temperature reaction of ammonia and sulfuric acid to produce a controlled-release nitrogen release fertilizer that is also rich in organic matter. The end product meets Class A pathogen reduction requirements and provides 14-17% controlled- release nitrogen.The paper describes the VitAg process and presents a methodology for tracking energy consumption through the fertilizer lifecycle, beginning with ammonia production and following through to plant nitrogen uptake and losses. Inputs are normalized on the basis of tons of plant available nitrogen, as measured by plant tissue analysis. Nitrogen uptake and loss entries are based on literature searches of field trials including the WERF study Estimating Plant Available Nutrients in Biosolids, field trials for rice, citrus, and field crops using a process similar to VitAg, and on other published sources. It is concluded from this literature review that biosolids-based fertilizers including VitAg provide approximately 1.7 times as much plant-available nitrogen (PAN) as inorganic fertilizers.As a result, the VitAg process uses approximately 31 percent less energy to deliver the same quantity PAN than inorganic fertilizers.Greenhouse gas emissions are affected by energy consumption, nitrous oxide volatilization at the point of application, and carbon sequestration offsets. Greenhouse gas emissions are tracked as equivalent tonnages of carbon dioxide per ton of PAN. The results show that the net greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production and application of the VitAg product are about 40 percent less than with an inorganic fertilizer delivering an equivalent amount of plant-available nitrogen.Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are compared for the following Class A biosolids management alternatives:Class A lime stabilization with heat stage for pathogen reduction:Thermal drying to produce either a soil conditioner or a fertilizer ingredient:Aerated static pile composting: andThe VitAg process.Because of the high energy and greenhouse gas cost of ammonia production, the ‘bottom line’ results of comparing options a), b), and c) is highly sensitive to the assumed percentage of plant availability of nitrogen. Percentage of plant availability is highly variable, determined by crop, climate, and other specifics. When considering the lower amount of ammonia required to deliver a specific amount of plant-available nitrogen the VitAg process has lower net energy and greenhouse impacts per dry ton of biosolids processed than the alternatives.
Nitrogen-based fertilizers for agriculture require energy-intensive production of ammonia, which may then be converted to urea or other fertilizer products. The nitrogen mineralizes more quickly than the rate of plant uptake, resulting in nitrate loss as leachate, runoff, and volatilized as nitrogen gas and nitrous oxide. Biosolids products mineralize more slowly, so a higher percentage of their...
Author(s)
Mark GouldJohn F. DonovanJeffrey C. BurnhamGary L. Dahms
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 17: Bioenergy IV
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:4L.1084;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802862491
Volume / Issue2011 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)1084 - 1102
Copyright2011
Word count469
Subject keywordscontrolled-release fertilizerbiosolidsVitAgUnity Fertilizergreenhouse gas emissions

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Mark Gould# John F. Donovan# Jeffrey C. Burnham# Gary L. Dahms. Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 13 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298941CITANCHOR>.
Mark Gould# John F. Donovan# Jeffrey C. Burnham# Gary L. Dahms. Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 13, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298941CITANCHOR.
Mark Gould# John F. Donovan# Jeffrey C. Burnham# Gary L. Dahms
Controlled-Release Fertilizer from Biosolids-Energy and Greenhouse Gas Comparison with other Biosolids Management Options
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 13, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298941CITANCHOR