This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Should I Use My Digester Gas? Should I Co-Digest?
Should I Use My Digester Gas? Should I Co-Digest?
Abstract
A brief summary of five example projects are presented and discussed where it was determined that combined heat and power (CHP) was either not cost-effective or not as cost-effective as anticipated, where existing CHP systems have issues such that they may not be cost-effective to retain or upgrade in the future, and where the introduction of off-site wastes into the digestion was determined to not be cost-effective. The plant sizes range from less than 2 mgd to greater than 50 mgd. Data and cost-effectiveness information is provided. The impact of changing types, quality, availability, and competition for high quality co-digestates is also discussed.
A brief summary of five example projects are presented and discussed where it was determined that combined heat and power (CHP) was either not cost-effective or not as cost-effective as anticipated, where existing CHP systems have issues such that they may not be cost-effective to retain or upgrade in the future, and where the introduction of off-site wastes into the digestion was determined to...
Author(s)
Ralph B. “Rusty” Schroedel
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectBeneficial use of biogas – planning
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2018
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20180101)2018:4L.970;1-
DOI10.2175/193864718824829136
Volume / Issue2018 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)970 - 982
Copyright2018
Word count112
Subject keywordsCo-DigestionCombined Heat and PowerDigester GasAnaerobic Digestion

Purchase price $11.50

Get access