lastID = -299873
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed...
Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:41:20 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:41:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:54:13 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:54:12 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 17:04:49 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 17:04:48 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 00:13:07 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:13:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 15:04:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 15:04:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:23:16 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:23:15 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:23:14 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed...
Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario

Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario

Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed...
Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario
Abstract
In 2011, EPA has released the new MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) emission limits for the high temperature fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators. All existing and new fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators have been mandated to be in compliance with the new MACT emission limits by March 2016. The new MACT emission limits are currently the most stringent emission limits in the world for fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators in terms of particulate matter, acid gas, heavy metals and mercury emissions. For the new fluid bed incinerators, new stack mercury emission limit is 1 μg/dscm (microgram per dry standard cubic meter or 0.001 mg/dscm) at 7% Oxygen. For the existing fluid bed incinerators, new stack mercury emission limit is 37 μg/dscm (microgram per dry standard cubic meter or 0.037 mg/dscm) at 7% Oxygen.One of the major upgrades to be in compliance with the new MACT emission limits is the addition of mercury removal system to the existing air pollution control equipment to meet the new mercury emission limits in stack. In some cases, a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP), caustic injection system and NOx removal system are added to meet the new metals, particulate matter (PM), acid gases and NOx emission requirements.There are two different mercury removal systems currently available in the market for retrofitting the existing fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators. First one is based on the fixed carbon bed adsorber technology and the second one is based on the sorbent polymer composite (SPC) technology. Fixed carbon bed adsorbers can be installed as part of the new air pollution control system to meet 0.001 mg/dscm (milligram per dry standard cubic meter) mercury emission limit as required in the newly installed incineration system. Fixed carbon bed adsorbers can remove not only mercury, but also dioxin and furan from the flue gas. SPC modules can be installed on the existing incineration systems to meet 0.037 mg/dscm mercury emission limit. SPC modules are employed to remove only mercury from the flue gas without removing any dioxin and furan. However, dioxin and furan emissions from municipal sludge fluid bed incinerators are typically low usually meeting the MACT emission limits on both pollutants without requiring any post combustion treatment. SPC (Sorbent Polymer Composite) modules cannot be incorporated into the new incineration system design to meet the 1 μg/dscm mercury emission limit required by MACT for the new incinerators. This is mainly due to this technology not having high mercury removal efficiency compared to fixed carbon bed system. SPC modules can only be installed on the existing fluid bed incinerators. SPC modules can not be used to remove dioxin and furan from the flue gas to meet the MACT limits for new fluid bed incinerators.In this technical paper, stack emission test results from several existing and new fluidized bed incinerators operating in the US and Ontario (CA) are being compared to MACT emission limits to determine the overall effectiveness of the air pollution control system installed on each incinerator. In addition, stack emission test results from existing and new installations are being reviewed to determine the effectiveness of mercury removal of the fixed carbon bed compared to SPC modules.Results indicated that retrofitted plants were meeting the MACT emission limits on mercury. For new incineration systems in US, it was necessary to have a fixed carbon bed adsorber to be able to meet 1 μg/dscm mercury emission requirement in stack. Fixed bed process resulted in extremely high removal efficiency (>95%). For an existing incineration system in US, results indicated that having SPC modules installed as part of APCS (Air Pollution Control System) was sufficient to meet the 37 μg/dscm mercury emission requirement. SPC modules resulted in mercury removal efficiency, which was higher than 70%. Based on the operating data from these installations, fixed carbon bed adsorbers were difficult to operate compared to SPC modules. However, fixed carbon bed technology had a higher mercury removal efficiency. In addition, based on the results, for the potential future incineration projects in Ontario (CA), having SPC modules installed after the wet scrubber would be enough to meet the mercury emission limit in stack (70 μg/drcm, microgram per dry reference cubic meter – drcm @ 11% Oxygen). This is mainly due to higher mercury emission limits in Ontario, Canada. SPC technology can be used on new fluid bed incinerators in Ontario, Canada to meet the higher mercury emission limit. In US, existing plant mercury emission requirement per MACT is 37 μg/dscm, which is significantly lower than the Canadian requirement for new incineration systems (70 μg/drcm).
In 2011, EPA has released the new MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) emission limits for the high temperature fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators. All existing and new fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators have been mandated to be in compliance with the new MACT emission limits by March 2016. The new MACT emission limits are currently the most stringent emission limits in the world...
Author(s)
K DangtranL Takmaz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectGreenhouse Gas management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2018
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20180101)2018:4L.1113;1-
DOI10.2175/193864718824828993
Volume / Issue2018 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)1113 - 1131
Copyright2018
Word count774
Subject keywordsFluidized bed thermal oxidationmercurydioxin-furanMACT

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed...
Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-299873
Get access
-299873
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed...
Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario
Abstract
In 2011, EPA has released the new MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) emission limits for the high temperature fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators. All existing and new fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators have been mandated to be in compliance with the new MACT emission limits by March 2016. The new MACT emission limits are currently the most stringent emission limits in the world for fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators in terms of particulate matter, acid gas, heavy metals and mercury emissions. For the new fluid bed incinerators, new stack mercury emission limit is 1 μg/dscm (microgram per dry standard cubic meter or 0.001 mg/dscm) at 7% Oxygen. For the existing fluid bed incinerators, new stack mercury emission limit is 37 μg/dscm (microgram per dry standard cubic meter or 0.037 mg/dscm) at 7% Oxygen.One of the major upgrades to be in compliance with the new MACT emission limits is the addition of mercury removal system to the existing air pollution control equipment to meet the new mercury emission limits in stack. In some cases, a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP), caustic injection system and NOx removal system are added to meet the new metals, particulate matter (PM), acid gases and NOx emission requirements.There are two different mercury removal systems currently available in the market for retrofitting the existing fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators. First one is based on the fixed carbon bed adsorber technology and the second one is based on the sorbent polymer composite (SPC) technology. Fixed carbon bed adsorbers can be installed as part of the new air pollution control system to meet 0.001 mg/dscm (milligram per dry standard cubic meter) mercury emission limit as required in the newly installed incineration system. Fixed carbon bed adsorbers can remove not only mercury, but also dioxin and furan from the flue gas. SPC modules can be installed on the existing incineration systems to meet 0.037 mg/dscm mercury emission limit. SPC modules are employed to remove only mercury from the flue gas without removing any dioxin and furan. However, dioxin and furan emissions from municipal sludge fluid bed incinerators are typically low usually meeting the MACT emission limits on both pollutants without requiring any post combustion treatment. SPC (Sorbent Polymer Composite) modules cannot be incorporated into the new incineration system design to meet the 1 μg/dscm mercury emission limit required by MACT for the new incinerators. This is mainly due to this technology not having high mercury removal efficiency compared to fixed carbon bed system. SPC modules can only be installed on the existing fluid bed incinerators. SPC modules can not be used to remove dioxin and furan from the flue gas to meet the MACT limits for new fluid bed incinerators.In this technical paper, stack emission test results from several existing and new fluidized bed incinerators operating in the US and Ontario (CA) are being compared to MACT emission limits to determine the overall effectiveness of the air pollution control system installed on each incinerator. In addition, stack emission test results from existing and new installations are being reviewed to determine the effectiveness of mercury removal of the fixed carbon bed compared to SPC modules.Results indicated that retrofitted plants were meeting the MACT emission limits on mercury. For new incineration systems in US, it was necessary to have a fixed carbon bed adsorber to be able to meet 1 μg/dscm mercury emission requirement in stack. Fixed bed process resulted in extremely high removal efficiency (>95%). For an existing incineration system in US, results indicated that having SPC modules installed as part of APCS (Air Pollution Control System) was sufficient to meet the 37 μg/dscm mercury emission requirement. SPC modules resulted in mercury removal efficiency, which was higher than 70%. Based on the operating data from these installations, fixed carbon bed adsorbers were difficult to operate compared to SPC modules. However, fixed carbon bed technology had a higher mercury removal efficiency. In addition, based on the results, for the potential future incineration projects in Ontario (CA), having SPC modules installed after the wet scrubber would be enough to meet the mercury emission limit in stack (70 μg/drcm, microgram per dry reference cubic meter – drcm @ 11% Oxygen). This is mainly due to higher mercury emission limits in Ontario, Canada. SPC technology can be used on new fluid bed incinerators in Ontario, Canada to meet the higher mercury emission limit. In US, existing plant mercury emission requirement per MACT is 37 μg/dscm, which is significantly lower than the Canadian requirement for new incineration systems (70 μg/drcm).
In 2011, EPA has released the new MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) emission limits for the high temperature fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators. All existing and new fluid bed municipal sludge incinerators have been mandated to be in compliance with the new MACT emission limits by March 2016. The new MACT emission limits are currently the most stringent emission limits in the world...
Author(s)
K DangtranL Takmaz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectGreenhouse Gas management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2018
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20180101)2018:4L.1113;1-
DOI10.2175/193864718824828993
Volume / Issue2018 / 4
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)1113 - 1131
Copyright2018
Word count774
Subject keywordsFluidized bed thermal oxidationmercurydioxin-furanMACT

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
K Dangtran# L Takmaz. Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2019. Web. 22 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-299873CITANCHOR>.
K Dangtran# L Takmaz. Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2019. Accessed August 22, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-299873CITANCHOR.
K Dangtran# L Takmaz
Stack Emission Tests Results from Existing and New High Temperature Fluidized Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators Operating in us and Ontario
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
January 18, 2019
August 22, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-299873CITANCHOR