lastID = -300073
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure...
A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 18:24:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 18:24:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 00:08:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 00:08:01 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 18:03:02 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 18:03:01 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-02-23 13:17:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 13:17:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 18:57:38 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:57:37 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure...
A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard

A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard

A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure...
A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard
Abstract
King County Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD) is in the process of considering Green Infrastructure (GI) projects as part of their Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) program capital planning, as part of that effort, WTD is working to determine when the investment in GI is commensurate to the cost of gray infrastructure on a unit basis (i.e., cost per gallon of CSO reduction). Additionally, WTD is working to identify what level of additional investment is appropriate for GI as compared to gray infrastructure based on the value of the ancillary benefits of GI, such as reducing stormwater flow to sewer system, providing ecosystem services, urban greening, climate change resiliency, etc.The development of a GI Project Scorecard (Scorecard) intends to provide WTD with the data to identify the types of GI projects, locations, and/or minimum performance necessary to be hydraulically cost-competitive to gray alternatives. This work also intends to provide King County WTD decision-makers with better information on when to pursue a capital GI project, how to select between multiple project concepts, and how to report out the justification for pursing a specific GI project.The Scorecard was developed through the research and review of existing GI cost and performance data, analysis of the co-benefits of GI and related value specific to King County, the development of cost-performance thresholds for GI, and the documentation of the Scorecard’s project evaluation metrics and methods. This presentation will inform conference participants on how those metrics were selected and the methods for quantifying those project benefits that are often considered unquantifiable.
King County Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD) is in the process of considering Green Infrastructure (GI) projects as part of their Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) program capital planning, as part of that effort, WTD is working to determine when the investment in GI is commensurate to the cost of gray infrastructure on a unit basis (i.e., cost per gallon of CSO reduction). Additionally, WTD is...
Author(s)
Robert DusenburyEric ZicklerJohn PhillipsAlice Lancaster
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Subject524 Does This Green Look Good on Me? Tools for Green Infrastructure Selection
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2018
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20180101)2018:8L.4817;1-
DOI10.2175/193864718825139456
Volume / Issue2018 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4817 - 4835
Copyright2018
Word count266
Subject keywordsGreen Stormwater InfrastructureLifecycle AnalysisCo-benefitsCSOsSustainability

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure...
A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-300073
Get access
-300073
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure...
A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard
Abstract
King County Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD) is in the process of considering Green Infrastructure (GI) projects as part of their Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) program capital planning, as part of that effort, WTD is working to determine when the investment in GI is commensurate to the cost of gray infrastructure on a unit basis (i.e., cost per gallon of CSO reduction). Additionally, WTD is working to identify what level of additional investment is appropriate for GI as compared to gray infrastructure based on the value of the ancillary benefits of GI, such as reducing stormwater flow to sewer system, providing ecosystem services, urban greening, climate change resiliency, etc.The development of a GI Project Scorecard (Scorecard) intends to provide WTD with the data to identify the types of GI projects, locations, and/or minimum performance necessary to be hydraulically cost-competitive to gray alternatives. This work also intends to provide King County WTD decision-makers with better information on when to pursue a capital GI project, how to select between multiple project concepts, and how to report out the justification for pursing a specific GI project.The Scorecard was developed through the research and review of existing GI cost and performance data, analysis of the co-benefits of GI and related value specific to King County, the development of cost-performance thresholds for GI, and the documentation of the Scorecard’s project evaluation metrics and methods. This presentation will inform conference participants on how those metrics were selected and the methods for quantifying those project benefits that are often considered unquantifiable.
King County Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD) is in the process of considering Green Infrastructure (GI) projects as part of their Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) program capital planning, as part of that effort, WTD is working to determine when the investment in GI is commensurate to the cost of gray infrastructure on a unit basis (i.e., cost per gallon of CSO reduction). Additionally, WTD is...
Author(s)
Robert DusenburyEric ZicklerJohn PhillipsAlice Lancaster
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Subject524 Does This Green Look Good on Me? Tools for Green Infrastructure Selection
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2018
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20180101)2018:8L.4817;1-
DOI10.2175/193864718825139456
Volume / Issue2018 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4817 - 4835
Copyright2018
Word count266
Subject keywordsGreen Stormwater InfrastructureLifecycle AnalysisCo-benefitsCSOsSustainability

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Robert Dusenbury# Eric Zickler# John Phillips# Alice Lancaster. A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2019. Web. 25 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-300073CITANCHOR>.
Robert Dusenbury# Eric Zickler# John Phillips# Alice Lancaster. A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2019. Accessed August 25, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-300073CITANCHOR.
Robert Dusenbury# Eric Zickler# John Phillips# Alice Lancaster
A Paper on Balancing CSO Program Investment: The King County Green Infrastructure Scorecard
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
January 18, 2019
August 25, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-300073CITANCHOR