lastID = -10028730
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet...
Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:32:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 12:13:46 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:23:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:23:01 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:27:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:27:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:26:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:26:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 15:03:23 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 15:03:22 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet...
Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area

Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area

Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet...
Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area
Abstract
Management of wet-weather flows is challenging utilities across the globe. Environmental, regulatory, and public pressures are requiring utilities to embark on programs to plan for and design facilities to convey, store, and treat the large volume of wet-weather flows to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges to receiving waterbodies. Many times, remote storage or treatment facilities located upstream of the wastewater treatment plant are the most cost-effective and feasible options because they reduce the need to increase capacity of conveyance facilities and the wastewater treatment plant to handle the additional flow. Locating these remote facilities is challenging for several reasons, the primary reason being that these remote facilities tend to be most cost-effective when located near the combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls where wet-weather flows need to be intercepted to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges. However, in many cases, these areas are typically fully developed, highly dense urban areas with limited availability of real estate that is expensive and can include significant demolition and business displacement. These areas also include constructability risks because of the close proximity to receiving waterbodies, including poor soils, liquefaction risk, and high groundwater. Permitting of these facilities is also challenging due to the existing land uses, setback limitations, height restrictions, shoreline implications, and noise regulations. In addition to the challenges associated with siting and permitting of these facilities, which require coordination with third parties for negotiations and approvals, this project required a compressed schedule to meet regulatory requirements associated with the Consent Decree deadlines. Siting and permitting remote facilities are seldom discussed but equally as important as the treatment technologies and design of the facilities themselves. This paper presents the collaborative approach implemented by the King County Wastewater Treatment Division to site and permit the Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station (GWWTS) in a dense urban area. The GWWTS collectively includes the wet-weather treatment station, influent and effluent conveyance pipelines, and an outfall structure in the Lower Duwamish Waterway
Management of wet-weather flows is challenging utilities across the globe. Environmental, regulatory, and public pressures are requiring utilities to embark on programs to plan for and design facilities to convey, store, and treat the large volume of wet-weather flows to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges to receiving waterbodies. Many times, remote storage or treatment facilities located upstream of the wastewater treatment plant are the most cost-effective and feasible options because they reduce the need to increase capacity of conveyance facilities and the wastewater treatment plant to handle the additional flow. Locating these remote facilities is challenging for several reasons, the primary reason being that these remote facilities tend to be most cost-effective when located near the combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls where wet-weather flows need to be intercepted to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges. However, in many cases, these areas are typically fully developed, highly dense urban areas with limited availability of real estate that is expensive and can include significant demolition and business displacement. These areas also include constructability risks because of the close proximity to receiving waterbodies, including poor soils, liquefaction risk, and high groundwater. Permitting of these facilities is also challenging due to the existing land uses, setback limitations, height restrictions, shoreline implications, and noise regulations. In addition to the challenges associated with siting and permitting of these facilities, which require coordination with third parties for negotiations and approvals, this project required a compressed schedule to meet regulatory requirements associated with the Consent Decree deadlines. Siting and permitting remote facilities are seldom discussed but equally as important as the treatment technologies and design of the facilities themselves. This paper presents the collaborative approach implemented by the King County Wastewater Treatment Division to site and permit the Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station (GWWTS) in a dense urban area. The GWWTS collectively includes the wet-weather treatment station, influent and effluent conveyance pipelines, and an outfall structure in the Lower Duwamish Waterway
SpeakerHastings, Tina
Presentation time
09:30:00
09:50:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:30:00
SessionThe Rain is Coming: Are you Ready for Wet Weather Treatment?
Session number305
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Resilience, Disaster Planning and Recovery, Stormwater, Green Infrastructure, and Wet Weather
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Resilience, Disaster Planning and Recovery, Stormwater, Green Infrastructure, and Wet Weather
Author(s)
T. HastingsC. RobinsonW. SroufeG. LongC. Murillo-OaksP. BurkeD. Pecha
Author(s)T. Hastings1; C. Robinson2; W. Sroufe3; G. Long4; C. Murillo-Oaks5; P. Burke6; D. Pecha7;
Author affiliation(s)Jacobs, WA1; King County Department of Natural Resources Wastewater Treatment Division2; King County Department of Natural Resources Wastewater Treatment Division3; Compass Resource Management4; HDR5; Jacobs6; HDR7; Jacobs, MI8; Jacobs, WI9; HDR10
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157887
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count21

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet...
Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10028730
Get access
-10028730
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet...
Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area
Abstract
Management of wet-weather flows is challenging utilities across the globe. Environmental, regulatory, and public pressures are requiring utilities to embark on programs to plan for and design facilities to convey, store, and treat the large volume of wet-weather flows to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges to receiving waterbodies. Many times, remote storage or treatment facilities located upstream of the wastewater treatment plant are the most cost-effective and feasible options because they reduce the need to increase capacity of conveyance facilities and the wastewater treatment plant to handle the additional flow. Locating these remote facilities is challenging for several reasons, the primary reason being that these remote facilities tend to be most cost-effective when located near the combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls where wet-weather flows need to be intercepted to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges. However, in many cases, these areas are typically fully developed, highly dense urban areas with limited availability of real estate that is expensive and can include significant demolition and business displacement. These areas also include constructability risks because of the close proximity to receiving waterbodies, including poor soils, liquefaction risk, and high groundwater. Permitting of these facilities is also challenging due to the existing land uses, setback limitations, height restrictions, shoreline implications, and noise regulations. In addition to the challenges associated with siting and permitting of these facilities, which require coordination with third parties for negotiations and approvals, this project required a compressed schedule to meet regulatory requirements associated with the Consent Decree deadlines. Siting and permitting remote facilities are seldom discussed but equally as important as the treatment technologies and design of the facilities themselves. This paper presents the collaborative approach implemented by the King County Wastewater Treatment Division to site and permit the Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station (GWWTS) in a dense urban area. The GWWTS collectively includes the wet-weather treatment station, influent and effluent conveyance pipelines, and an outfall structure in the Lower Duwamish Waterway
Management of wet-weather flows is challenging utilities across the globe. Environmental, regulatory, and public pressures are requiring utilities to embark on programs to plan for and design facilities to convey, store, and treat the large volume of wet-weather flows to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges to receiving waterbodies. Many times, remote storage or treatment facilities located upstream of the wastewater treatment plant are the most cost-effective and feasible options because they reduce the need to increase capacity of conveyance facilities and the wastewater treatment plant to handle the additional flow. Locating these remote facilities is challenging for several reasons, the primary reason being that these remote facilities tend to be most cost-effective when located near the combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls where wet-weather flows need to be intercepted to reduce the frequency of untreated discharges. However, in many cases, these areas are typically fully developed, highly dense urban areas with limited availability of real estate that is expensive and can include significant demolition and business displacement. These areas also include constructability risks because of the close proximity to receiving waterbodies, including poor soils, liquefaction risk, and high groundwater. Permitting of these facilities is also challenging due to the existing land uses, setback limitations, height restrictions, shoreline implications, and noise regulations. In addition to the challenges associated with siting and permitting of these facilities, which require coordination with third parties for negotiations and approvals, this project required a compressed schedule to meet regulatory requirements associated with the Consent Decree deadlines. Siting and permitting remote facilities are seldom discussed but equally as important as the treatment technologies and design of the facilities themselves. This paper presents the collaborative approach implemented by the King County Wastewater Treatment Division to site and permit the Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station (GWWTS) in a dense urban area. The GWWTS collectively includes the wet-weather treatment station, influent and effluent conveyance pipelines, and an outfall structure in the Lower Duwamish Waterway
SpeakerHastings, Tina
Presentation time
09:30:00
09:50:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:30:00
SessionThe Rain is Coming: Are you Ready for Wet Weather Treatment?
Session number305
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Resilience, Disaster Planning and Recovery, Stormwater, Green Infrastructure, and Wet Weather
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Resilience, Disaster Planning and Recovery, Stormwater, Green Infrastructure, and Wet Weather
Author(s)
T. HastingsC. RobinsonW. SroufeG. LongC. Murillo-OaksP. BurkeD. Pecha
Author(s)T. Hastings1; C. Robinson2; W. Sroufe3; G. Long4; C. Murillo-Oaks5; P. Burke6; D. Pecha7;
Author affiliation(s)Jacobs, WA1; King County Department of Natural Resources Wastewater Treatment Division2; King County Department of Natural Resources Wastewater Treatment Division3; Compass Resource Management4; HDR5; Jacobs6; HDR7; Jacobs, MI8; Jacobs, WI9; HDR10
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157887
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count21

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
T. Hastings#C. Robinson#W. Sroufe#G. Long#C. Murillo-Oaks#P. Burke#D. Pecha#. Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Web. 9 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10028730CITANCHOR>.
T. Hastings#C. Robinson#W. Sroufe#G. Long#C. Murillo-Oaks#P. Burke#D. Pecha#. Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028730CITANCHOR.
T. Hastings#C. Robinson#W. Sroufe#G. Long#C. Murillo-Oaks#P. Burke#D. Pecha#
Where Will It Go? Successfully Siting and Permitting the Remote Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station in a Dense Urban Area
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 6, 2020
May 9, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028730CITANCHOR