lastID = -10082018
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-23 21:08:34 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-05-23 20:43:50 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion

Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion

Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Abstract
The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District operates the Renewable Energy Facility (REF) at the Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center. Commissioned in 2014, the REF includes sludge dewatering, incineration, and energy recovery processes. The facility receives an average of 120 dry tons per day of biosolids from two of the District's three treatment plants. Combustion in a fluidized bed incinerator is a complex process with many factors that affect operation. The incineration process at REF faces two primary challenges to realizing efficient process operation: first, the biosolids loading is approximately 20% lower than the projections used for design conditions and second, the volatile solids proportion is relatively low as a result of the District's majority combined sewer collection system. In order to overcome these challenges and maximize autogenous operation, the following three strategies are in various stages of deployment: 1.Implementation of informational tools to fully optimize combustion process 2. Full use of a Grease Merchant Facility 3. Exploration of an Intermittent Operating Strategy In 2021, operations and engineering staff began an FBI optimization effort. As part of this work, a mass and energy balance was developed to represent operating conditions in the process. This tool is able to be implemented in real time by integrating with the Plant's process management software to quickly pull in new data as it becomes available. By using this tool, operations staff is able to build a more robust understanding of the process and predict the effect of various operational changes when deciding on a course of action to take. In 2016, the Grease Unloading Station (GUS) was completed. This is a merchant facility that allows the grease processing system to receive a higher volume of loads from grease trap haulers. This is a significant benefit to the incineration process which allows grease addition to the cake feed system. Despite representing about 5% of the biosolids feed by weight, the grease can account for 20-30% of the chemical energy in the feed. Currently District operations staff are planning a full pilot of an intermittent operating strategy for the three incinerator trains at the REF. Each train is rated to process 100 dry tons of biosolids per day and the average daily loading to the facility is 120 dtpd. This means that, when running at a steady state, our units are loaded at approximately 60% of capacity. In order to maintain a higher uptime of operation without supplemental fuel addition, intermittently operating one and two units at a time would fully load each incinerator that is operating. Past attempts at this strategy have not fully utilized the capacity of the incinerators and it's expected that an updated implementation of this operating strategy would yield much improved results from past attempts. Note to reviewers: There are two main components to this prospective presentation: (A) an introduction/overview of the mass and energy inputs/outputs to the fluid bed combustion process and (B) a demonstration of how we use this understanding to optimize operation at our facility with the three parts I discuss above. Part A is more a presentation on the fundamentals of the process and Part B is geared towards presenting data and a unique challenge at our facility. If selected, I can tailor the presentation towards one end or the other depending on feedback from the conference program committee and how it is intended to fit with other sessions.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference in Columbus, Ohio, May 24-27, 2022.
SpeakerMerchant-Wells, Nicholas
Presentation time
9:00:00
9:30:00
Session time
8:30:00
10:00:00
Session number09
Session locationGreater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio
TopicFluidized Bed Incinerator, incineration, Thermal Oxidation
TopicFluidized Bed Incinerator, incineration, Thermal Oxidation
Author(s)
N. Merchant-Wells
Author(s)N. Merchant-Wells1
Author affiliation(s)Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District; 1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158393
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids
Copyright2022
Word count5

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10082018
Get access
-10082018
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Abstract
The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District operates the Renewable Energy Facility (REF) at the Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center. Commissioned in 2014, the REF includes sludge dewatering, incineration, and energy recovery processes. The facility receives an average of 120 dry tons per day of biosolids from two of the District's three treatment plants. Combustion in a fluidized bed incinerator is a complex process with many factors that affect operation. The incineration process at REF faces two primary challenges to realizing efficient process operation: first, the biosolids loading is approximately 20% lower than the projections used for design conditions and second, the volatile solids proportion is relatively low as a result of the District's majority combined sewer collection system. In order to overcome these challenges and maximize autogenous operation, the following three strategies are in various stages of deployment: 1.Implementation of informational tools to fully optimize combustion process 2. Full use of a Grease Merchant Facility 3. Exploration of an Intermittent Operating Strategy In 2021, operations and engineering staff began an FBI optimization effort. As part of this work, a mass and energy balance was developed to represent operating conditions in the process. This tool is able to be implemented in real time by integrating with the Plant's process management software to quickly pull in new data as it becomes available. By using this tool, operations staff is able to build a more robust understanding of the process and predict the effect of various operational changes when deciding on a course of action to take. In 2016, the Grease Unloading Station (GUS) was completed. This is a merchant facility that allows the grease processing system to receive a higher volume of loads from grease trap haulers. This is a significant benefit to the incineration process which allows grease addition to the cake feed system. Despite representing about 5% of the biosolids feed by weight, the grease can account for 20-30% of the chemical energy in the feed. Currently District operations staff are planning a full pilot of an intermittent operating strategy for the three incinerator trains at the REF. Each train is rated to process 100 dry tons of biosolids per day and the average daily loading to the facility is 120 dtpd. This means that, when running at a steady state, our units are loaded at approximately 60% of capacity. In order to maintain a higher uptime of operation without supplemental fuel addition, intermittently operating one and two units at a time would fully load each incinerator that is operating. Past attempts at this strategy have not fully utilized the capacity of the incinerators and it's expected that an updated implementation of this operating strategy would yield much improved results from past attempts. Note to reviewers: There are two main components to this prospective presentation: (A) an introduction/overview of the mass and energy inputs/outputs to the fluid bed combustion process and (B) a demonstration of how we use this understanding to optimize operation at our facility with the three parts I discuss above. Part A is more a presentation on the fundamentals of the process and Part B is geared towards presenting data and a unique challenge at our facility. If selected, I can tailor the presentation towards one end or the other depending on feedback from the conference program committee and how it is intended to fit with other sessions.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference in Columbus, Ohio, May 24-27, 2022.
SpeakerMerchant-Wells, Nicholas
Presentation time
9:00:00
9:30:00
Session time
8:30:00
10:00:00
Session number09
Session locationGreater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio
TopicFluidized Bed Incinerator, incineration, Thermal Oxidation
TopicFluidized Bed Incinerator, incineration, Thermal Oxidation
Author(s)
N. Merchant-Wells
Author(s)N. Merchant-Wells1
Author affiliation(s)Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District; 1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158393
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids
Copyright2022
Word count5

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
N. Merchant-Wells. Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 20 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10082018CITANCHOR>.
N. Merchant-Wells. Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed June 20, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10082018CITANCHOR.
N. Merchant-Wells
Optimizing Fluid Bed Combustion
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
May 26, 2022
June 20, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10082018CITANCHOR