lastID = -10082048
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation...
Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:02:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-23 21:06:47 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-05-23 20:44:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-23 20:44:48 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation...
Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment

Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment

Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation...
Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment
Abstract
1. Introduction Thermal hydrolysis pretreatment (THP) of sewage sludge prior to anaerobic digestion is known to be able to enhance the sludge digestibility. For that reason, higher total solids (TS) contents and shorter solids retention times (SRTs) have been commonly used for anaerobic digesters (ADs) fed with sludge processed with THP. Yet, it is also known that the sludge digestibility should decrease with the increase of TS and decrease of SRTs. Whether the application of THP can justify the sludge digestibility loss at higher TS and shorter SRTs remains to be addressed. Moreover, whether blending waste activated sludge (WAS) with primary sludge (PS) can further enhance the digestibility of the WAS following THP is another unknown. Therefore, this study is aimed to understand the effect of TS, SRTs, and PS /WAS blending on sludge digestibility with THP. 2. Materials and Methods Thermal hydrolysis pretreatment A five-gallon capacity THP system shown in Figure 1 was procured from CAMBITM . The THP unit was heated by hot steam to 165 oC for 30 min (6 bar). The treated sludge was cooled down to room temperature prior to feeding into bench-scale mesophilic ADs shown in Figure 2a. Anaerobic digester setup Six units of mechanically mixed ADs as shown in Figure 2a were operated in parallel with temperature maintained at 36.5 ± 0.3 oC using two thermal tents as illustrated in Figure 2b. Another six units of gas recirculation mixed ADs were set up and operated as described in a previous study (Zhang et al., 2020). These ADs were inoculated with fresh effluent sludge from a full-scale THP-fed mesophilic AD at DC Water. The TS feeding into these mechanically mixed ADs was 9% while the TS feeding into these gas recirculation mixed ADs was 4% (Table 1). Blended sludge (PS:WAS, 31:19, w/w dry) collected from a local wastewater treatment plant, (WWTP) was processed through THP and then fed into three mechanically mixed ADs to study the SRT effect on volatile solids reduction (VSR) at 9% TS. The same blended sludge without THP was also fed into another six gas recirculation mixed ADs to study the SRT effect on VSR at 4% TS. PS, WAS, and blended sludge (PS:WAS ,1:1, w/w dry) collected from another local WWTP were processed through THP to feed another three mechanically mixed ADs operated at a TS of 9% and SRT of 15 days to study the effect of sludge blending on the sludge digestibility improvement in terms of VSR. Detailed SRTs, TS, and PS:WAS ratios used in the study can be found in Table 1. 3. Results and Discussion VSR has been used as an indicator of sludge digestibility (Schnaars, 2012). Results in Figure 3a revealed that VSR is positively related to the SRT used in the THP-enhanced ADs. This relationship is more prominent at high TS. For example, at 9% TS, VSRs dropped by 4% as SRTs were reduced from 15 days to 10 days. In contrast, at 4% TS, VSRs dropped the same 4 % when SRTs were reduced from 50 to 15 days. It is noteworthy that, at the SRT of 15 days, VSR dropped another 4% when TS was switched from 4% to 9% even with THP (Figure 3a). The decline of VSR as TS increases is expected because of the high loading rate that was imposed on the AD system. However, the THP enhancement on the sludge digestibility is still prominent in that the loading rate has been increased for 225% when TS was increased from 4% to 9% while the VSR only dropped for 4% at a SRT of 15 days. Even at the SRT of 10 days, such a VSR drop was only 8% in sludge with THP as compared to the sludge without THP at the SRT of 15 days. As shown in Figure 3b, although the VSR of WAS was only as low as 36%, after blending it with PS at a 1:1 ratio, the overall VSR turned out to be as good as 49% which is very similar to that of the PS. This result indicates that blending WAS into PS can significantly improve the digestibility of WAS in THP enhanced AD system for 13%. 4. Conclusions The following concluding remarks can be drawn from this study: 1) The drop of VSRs as a result of SRT decrease from 50 days to 10 days can be explained by the loading rate increase as a result of the THP. 2) Blending WAS with PS can increase the digestibility of WAS by 15% at 9% TS with THP.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference in Columbus, Ohio, May 24-27, 2022.
SpeakerLuo, Hao
Presentation time
13:30:00
14:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
Session number12
Session locationGreater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Thermal hydrolysis
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Thermal hydrolysis
Author(s)
H. Luo
Author(s)H. Luo1; M. Taylor2; C. Nguyen3; M. Strawn4; L. Racey5; B. Balchunas6; C. Moline7
Author affiliation(s)Virginia Tech; 1Washington Suburban Sanitary Commision; 2Residuals and Biosolids Speaker; 3Arlington County Water Pollution Control Bureau; 4Arlington County Water Pollution Control Bureau; 5HDR Inc; 6HDR Inc; 7
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158423
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids
Copyright2022
Word count16

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation...
Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10082048
Get access
-10082048
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation...
Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment
Abstract
1. Introduction Thermal hydrolysis pretreatment (THP) of sewage sludge prior to anaerobic digestion is known to be able to enhance the sludge digestibility. For that reason, higher total solids (TS) contents and shorter solids retention times (SRTs) have been commonly used for anaerobic digesters (ADs) fed with sludge processed with THP. Yet, it is also known that the sludge digestibility should decrease with the increase of TS and decrease of SRTs. Whether the application of THP can justify the sludge digestibility loss at higher TS and shorter SRTs remains to be addressed. Moreover, whether blending waste activated sludge (WAS) with primary sludge (PS) can further enhance the digestibility of the WAS following THP is another unknown. Therefore, this study is aimed to understand the effect of TS, SRTs, and PS /WAS blending on sludge digestibility with THP. 2. Materials and Methods Thermal hydrolysis pretreatment A five-gallon capacity THP system shown in Figure 1 was procured from CAMBITM . The THP unit was heated by hot steam to 165 oC for 30 min (6 bar). The treated sludge was cooled down to room temperature prior to feeding into bench-scale mesophilic ADs shown in Figure 2a. Anaerobic digester setup Six units of mechanically mixed ADs as shown in Figure 2a were operated in parallel with temperature maintained at 36.5 ± 0.3 oC using two thermal tents as illustrated in Figure 2b. Another six units of gas recirculation mixed ADs were set up and operated as described in a previous study (Zhang et al., 2020). These ADs were inoculated with fresh effluent sludge from a full-scale THP-fed mesophilic AD at DC Water. The TS feeding into these mechanically mixed ADs was 9% while the TS feeding into these gas recirculation mixed ADs was 4% (Table 1). Blended sludge (PS:WAS, 31:19, w/w dry) collected from a local wastewater treatment plant, (WWTP) was processed through THP and then fed into three mechanically mixed ADs to study the SRT effect on volatile solids reduction (VSR) at 9% TS. The same blended sludge without THP was also fed into another six gas recirculation mixed ADs to study the SRT effect on VSR at 4% TS. PS, WAS, and blended sludge (PS:WAS ,1:1, w/w dry) collected from another local WWTP were processed through THP to feed another three mechanically mixed ADs operated at a TS of 9% and SRT of 15 days to study the effect of sludge blending on the sludge digestibility improvement in terms of VSR. Detailed SRTs, TS, and PS:WAS ratios used in the study can be found in Table 1. 3. Results and Discussion VSR has been used as an indicator of sludge digestibility (Schnaars, 2012). Results in Figure 3a revealed that VSR is positively related to the SRT used in the THP-enhanced ADs. This relationship is more prominent at high TS. For example, at 9% TS, VSRs dropped by 4% as SRTs were reduced from 15 days to 10 days. In contrast, at 4% TS, VSRs dropped the same 4 % when SRTs were reduced from 50 to 15 days. It is noteworthy that, at the SRT of 15 days, VSR dropped another 4% when TS was switched from 4% to 9% even with THP (Figure 3a). The decline of VSR as TS increases is expected because of the high loading rate that was imposed on the AD system. However, the THP enhancement on the sludge digestibility is still prominent in that the loading rate has been increased for 225% when TS was increased from 4% to 9% while the VSR only dropped for 4% at a SRT of 15 days. Even at the SRT of 10 days, such a VSR drop was only 8% in sludge with THP as compared to the sludge without THP at the SRT of 15 days. As shown in Figure 3b, although the VSR of WAS was only as low as 36%, after blending it with PS at a 1:1 ratio, the overall VSR turned out to be as good as 49% which is very similar to that of the PS. This result indicates that blending WAS into PS can significantly improve the digestibility of WAS in THP enhanced AD system for 13%. 4. Conclusions The following concluding remarks can be drawn from this study: 1) The drop of VSRs as a result of SRT decrease from 50 days to 10 days can be explained by the loading rate increase as a result of the THP. 2) Blending WAS with PS can increase the digestibility of WAS by 15% at 9% TS with THP.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference in Columbus, Ohio, May 24-27, 2022.
SpeakerLuo, Hao
Presentation time
13:30:00
14:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
Session number12
Session locationGreater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Thermal hydrolysis
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Thermal hydrolysis
Author(s)
H. Luo
Author(s)H. Luo1; M. Taylor2; C. Nguyen3; M. Strawn4; L. Racey5; B. Balchunas6; C. Moline7
Author affiliation(s)Virginia Tech; 1Washington Suburban Sanitary Commision; 2Residuals and Biosolids Speaker; 3Arlington County Water Pollution Control Bureau; 4Arlington County Water Pollution Control Bureau; 5HDR Inc; 6HDR Inc; 7
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158423
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids
Copyright2022
Word count16

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
H. Luo. Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 20 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10082048CITANCHOR>.
H. Luo. Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed June 20, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10082048CITANCHOR.
H. Luo
Effect of Primary and Secondary Sludge Blending on Recalcitrant Nitrogen Formation in Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
May 26, 2022
June 20, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10082048CITANCHOR