lastID = -10083960
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:26:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 12:40:33 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-10-05 11:52:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 11:51:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:38:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:38:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:12:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:12:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-07 11:40:54 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach

St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach

St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
Abstract
Objectives
The objective of the presentation is to describe the modeling used to evaluate phosphorus management alternatives in St. Albans Bay, Vermont. The modeling used a simple spreadsheet Lake Loading Response Model (LLRM) to estimate watershed phosphorus loads and response in the bay along with a stand-alone sediment flux model (SFM) to estimate internal sediment phosphorus fluxes. However, the simple modeling approaches required a few major assumptions that included a phosphorus dispersive exchange between the bay and Lake Champlain. This presentation will also describe how model sensitivity runs allowed evaluation of the assumptions used. A number of management scenarios were analyzed with LLRM to evaluate the effect of watershed and sediment load reduction alternatives to reduce phosphorus and algal blooms in the bay. Results of the modeling will help guide future phosphorus management strategies in the bay.
Background
St. Albans Bay is located off of Lake Champlain and has a long history of eutrophic conditions and excessive algal blooms during the summer. Figure 1 presents the St. Albans Bay watershed and land uses. Major sources of nutrients to the bay include the City of St. Albans Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) as well as runoff from the agricultural dominated watershed. In 1987, the WWTF was upgraded to reduce phosphorus loading by 90%. However, algal blooms and phosphorus levels in the bay did not improve as expected. The USACE Phase II Feasibility Study for Wetland and Phosphorus Management funded the effort and in coordination with the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VTDEC) is planning for short- and long-term phosphorus management that include sediment phosphorus control in addition to potential watershed and wetland controls. This project was completed in 2021 and implementation of management alternatives is under discussion.
Approach
To evaluate watershed phosphorus loading and response in the bay, we integrated two simple models: an Excel-based steady-state Lake Loading Response Model (LLRM) for watershed loads and bay response; and a time-varying sediment flux model (SFM) to provide sediment phosphorus fluxes and response time for management actions. Setup for LLRM involved evaluation of the three major rivers that discharge to the bay (Mill River, Jewett Brook and Stevens Brook), runoff loads and flows based on land use, WWTF effluent loads, and the exchange of phosphorus between the bay and open waters of Lake Champlain. LLRM assumes a completely mixed volume with inflows and outflows. The bay is not a fully enclosed lake, but has a downstream connection with Lake Champlain that includes dispersive exchange in addition to outflow. One of the major challenges was incorporating the exchange of phosphorus between the bay and open waters of Lake Champlain. Setup for the SFM involved analysis of data, estimates of settled loads for inputs along with overlying water column dissolved oxygen and temperature to calculate the time-variable response in sediment phosphorus fluxes and sediment oxygen demand (SOD). Results of the SFM were then incorporated into LLRM. LLRM was calibrated to available runoff flows, watershed loads, bay total phosphorus (TP) and chlorophyll-a for the years 2016 through 2019 that represented low, average and high flow years. The SFM was calibrated to historic sediment data that included sediment phosphorus fluxes, SOD, sediment pore water and particulate concentrations. Both models reasonably reproduced the available data and were considered useful the intended project use. Thirteen different load reduction scenarios in addition to the baseline conditions were analyzed using the LLRM-SFM integrated models. The scenarios included reductions in watershed loads, reductions in internal sediment loads, and various combinations of sediment and watershed load reductions. These model scenarios were used to estimate the water quality benefits associated with the various load reduction alternatives. As part of the LLRM modeling, the dispersive exchange between the bay and lake was needed. This dispersive exchange was calculated from available chloride and phosphorus data with the concentration gradient between the bay/lake proving to be a very important factor affecting calculated bay phosphorus levels. For the model projection scenarios, specification of the lake phosphorus concentration in calculating the dispersive exchange was a major factor in determining the magnitude of water quality improvements in the bay. To account for the lake concentration in the projection scenarios, multiple model scenarios were run assuming different lake TP concentrations for the dispersive exchange rate calculation. These lake TP concentrations ranged from the proposed lake TMDL TP concentration to existing lake TP concentrations. Figure 2 presents the significant impact that the assigned lake TP concentration has on the resulting bay TP reduction for a number of different load reduction scenarios.
Findings/Results
Although there were many assumptions that needed to be made for application of these simplified models, the LLRM and SFM reproduced the data well in all years except 2019, which happened to be a very high flow year. This is likely due to the limitation of the model with regards to the bay/lake dispersive exchange and availability data.
The following main findings are provided from this modeling study.
1. Model projection scenario and sensitivity results showed the significant impact that the assigned lake TP concentration (used to calculate bay/lake dispersive exchange) has on the LLRM model results. For example, the calculated bay TP concentration increases from 23 µg/L (using a lake TP of 14 µg/L) to 30 µg/L (using a lake TP of 23 µg/L). This equates to a percent TP reduction that decreases from 32% to 7%.
2. As phosphorus load reductions in the watershed are implemented and ultimately achieved, their effectiveness in reducing bay TP and chl-a levels need to be viewed together with actual reductions in lake TP levels. Without concurrent reductions in lake TP levels, expected improvements in bay water quality due to load reductions may not be realized because lake TP levels are not changing.
3. There are benefits to applying simple models to evaluate load reductions on water quality improvements that include reduced data needs, shorter time (and cost) for model development and ease of use. Application of these simple models can provide guidance for management strategies but may require various assumptions to complete the analysis.
4. In this case, the bay/lake dispersive exchange could be better represented with use of more complex hydrodynamic/transport models; and the estimation of sediment phosphorus flux could be better represented with a coupled eutrophication/SFM model.
5. Although there are limitations in the use of simple modeling tools, as long as the limitations and assumptions are transparent, their utility in evaluating watershed management strategies can be effective.
This paper describes the modeling used to evaluate phosphorus management in St. Albans Bay, Vermont. The modeling used a simple spreadsheet lake loading response model to estimate watershed phosphorus loads and response in the bay and a stand-alone sediment flux model to estimate internal sediment phosphorus fluxes. A number of management scenarios were analyzed to evaluate the effect of watershed and sediment load reduction alternatives to reduce phosphorus and algal blooms in the bay.
SpeakerThuman, Andrew
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:25:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Watershed Management, Water Quality, and Groundwater, Wet Weather
TopicIntermediate Level, Watershed Management, Water Quality, and Groundwater, Wet Weather
Author(s)
Thuman, Andrew
Author(s)Andrew J. Thuman1; Mikayla Reichard2
Author affiliation(s)HDR Engineering, Inc., Mahwah, NJ1; HDR Engineering, Inc., Mahwah, NJ2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158716
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count10

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10083960
Get access
-10083960
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
Abstract
Objectives
The objective of the presentation is to describe the modeling used to evaluate phosphorus management alternatives in St. Albans Bay, Vermont. The modeling used a simple spreadsheet Lake Loading Response Model (LLRM) to estimate watershed phosphorus loads and response in the bay along with a stand-alone sediment flux model (SFM) to estimate internal sediment phosphorus fluxes. However, the simple modeling approaches required a few major assumptions that included a phosphorus dispersive exchange between the bay and Lake Champlain. This presentation will also describe how model sensitivity runs allowed evaluation of the assumptions used. A number of management scenarios were analyzed with LLRM to evaluate the effect of watershed and sediment load reduction alternatives to reduce phosphorus and algal blooms in the bay. Results of the modeling will help guide future phosphorus management strategies in the bay.
Background
St. Albans Bay is located off of Lake Champlain and has a long history of eutrophic conditions and excessive algal blooms during the summer. Figure 1 presents the St. Albans Bay watershed and land uses. Major sources of nutrients to the bay include the City of St. Albans Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) as well as runoff from the agricultural dominated watershed. In 1987, the WWTF was upgraded to reduce phosphorus loading by 90%. However, algal blooms and phosphorus levels in the bay did not improve as expected. The USACE Phase II Feasibility Study for Wetland and Phosphorus Management funded the effort and in coordination with the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VTDEC) is planning for short- and long-term phosphorus management that include sediment phosphorus control in addition to potential watershed and wetland controls. This project was completed in 2021 and implementation of management alternatives is under discussion.
Approach
To evaluate watershed phosphorus loading and response in the bay, we integrated two simple models: an Excel-based steady-state Lake Loading Response Model (LLRM) for watershed loads and bay response; and a time-varying sediment flux model (SFM) to provide sediment phosphorus fluxes and response time for management actions. Setup for LLRM involved evaluation of the three major rivers that discharge to the bay (Mill River, Jewett Brook and Stevens Brook), runoff loads and flows based on land use, WWTF effluent loads, and the exchange of phosphorus between the bay and open waters of Lake Champlain. LLRM assumes a completely mixed volume with inflows and outflows. The bay is not a fully enclosed lake, but has a downstream connection with Lake Champlain that includes dispersive exchange in addition to outflow. One of the major challenges was incorporating the exchange of phosphorus between the bay and open waters of Lake Champlain. Setup for the SFM involved analysis of data, estimates of settled loads for inputs along with overlying water column dissolved oxygen and temperature to calculate the time-variable response in sediment phosphorus fluxes and sediment oxygen demand (SOD). Results of the SFM were then incorporated into LLRM. LLRM was calibrated to available runoff flows, watershed loads, bay total phosphorus (TP) and chlorophyll-a for the years 2016 through 2019 that represented low, average and high flow years. The SFM was calibrated to historic sediment data that included sediment phosphorus fluxes, SOD, sediment pore water and particulate concentrations. Both models reasonably reproduced the available data and were considered useful the intended project use. Thirteen different load reduction scenarios in addition to the baseline conditions were analyzed using the LLRM-SFM integrated models. The scenarios included reductions in watershed loads, reductions in internal sediment loads, and various combinations of sediment and watershed load reductions. These model scenarios were used to estimate the water quality benefits associated with the various load reduction alternatives. As part of the LLRM modeling, the dispersive exchange between the bay and lake was needed. This dispersive exchange was calculated from available chloride and phosphorus data with the concentration gradient between the bay/lake proving to be a very important factor affecting calculated bay phosphorus levels. For the model projection scenarios, specification of the lake phosphorus concentration in calculating the dispersive exchange was a major factor in determining the magnitude of water quality improvements in the bay. To account for the lake concentration in the projection scenarios, multiple model scenarios were run assuming different lake TP concentrations for the dispersive exchange rate calculation. These lake TP concentrations ranged from the proposed lake TMDL TP concentration to existing lake TP concentrations. Figure 2 presents the significant impact that the assigned lake TP concentration has on the resulting bay TP reduction for a number of different load reduction scenarios.
Findings/Results
Although there were many assumptions that needed to be made for application of these simplified models, the LLRM and SFM reproduced the data well in all years except 2019, which happened to be a very high flow year. This is likely due to the limitation of the model with regards to the bay/lake dispersive exchange and availability data.
The following main findings are provided from this modeling study.
1. Model projection scenario and sensitivity results showed the significant impact that the assigned lake TP concentration (used to calculate bay/lake dispersive exchange) has on the LLRM model results. For example, the calculated bay TP concentration increases from 23 µg/L (using a lake TP of 14 µg/L) to 30 µg/L (using a lake TP of 23 µg/L). This equates to a percent TP reduction that decreases from 32% to 7%.
2. As phosphorus load reductions in the watershed are implemented and ultimately achieved, their effectiveness in reducing bay TP and chl-a levels need to be viewed together with actual reductions in lake TP levels. Without concurrent reductions in lake TP levels, expected improvements in bay water quality due to load reductions may not be realized because lake TP levels are not changing.
3. There are benefits to applying simple models to evaluate load reductions on water quality improvements that include reduced data needs, shorter time (and cost) for model development and ease of use. Application of these simple models can provide guidance for management strategies but may require various assumptions to complete the analysis.
4. In this case, the bay/lake dispersive exchange could be better represented with use of more complex hydrodynamic/transport models; and the estimation of sediment phosphorus flux could be better represented with a coupled eutrophication/SFM model.
5. Although there are limitations in the use of simple modeling tools, as long as the limitations and assumptions are transparent, their utility in evaluating watershed management strategies can be effective.
This paper describes the modeling used to evaluate phosphorus management in St. Albans Bay, Vermont. The modeling used a simple spreadsheet lake loading response model to estimate watershed phosphorus loads and response in the bay and a stand-alone sediment flux model to estimate internal sediment phosphorus fluxes. A number of management scenarios were analyzed to evaluate the effect of watershed and sediment load reduction alternatives to reduce phosphorus and algal blooms in the bay.
SpeakerThuman, Andrew
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:25:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Watershed Management, Water Quality, and Groundwater, Wet Weather
TopicIntermediate Level, Watershed Management, Water Quality, and Groundwater, Wet Weather
Author(s)
Thuman, Andrew
Author(s)Andrew J. Thuman1; Mikayla Reichard2
Author affiliation(s)HDR Engineering, Inc., Mahwah, NJ1; HDR Engineering, Inc., Mahwah, NJ2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158716
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count10

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Thuman, Andrew. St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 4 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10083960CITANCHOR>.
Thuman, Andrew. St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed July 4, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083960CITANCHOR.
Thuman, Andrew
St. Albans Bay Phosphorus Study: A Simplified Modeling Approach
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 11, 2022
July 4, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083960CITANCHOR