lastID = -10083970
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:28:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 12:39:59 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-10-05 11:52:12 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 11:52:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:13:07 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:13:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-07 11:41:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-07 11:41:09 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors

The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors

The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
Abstract
Introduction and Background
The use of bioelectrochemical sensors (BESs) to monitor biological processes in engineered environmental systems has received increasing interest in recent years. The BES is an electrochemical devise, based on the electrochemical interactions of microorganisms and enzymes with the electrodes. The signal produced using this sensor is a direct result of the microbial activity within the BES. In detail, it relies on the ability of some bacteria to transfer electrons from a reduced electron donor, the substrate, to a solid electrode material called anode, which is the electron acceptor. The anode is connected, via an external electrical circuit, to the cathode, which is covered by bacteria that catalyze the reduction of an oxidized electron acceptor (Lovley, 2011). The potential benefits of using these sensors include provide early warnings of biological process upsets, detect inhibitory effects of shock loads and toxic content and monitor nutrient depletion (Grattieri et al, 2017). Anaerobic processes, especially anaerobic digestion and co-digestion systems, could benefit from the implementation of these sensors to monitor the process performance, given their high operational complexity in managing the variation in feedstock composition, complex metabolic properties and feeding strategies. However, open questions remain on the efficacy and reproducibility of BESs. Our research aims to fill knowledge gaps related to feasibility of using BESs to monitor and predict the performance of anaerobic digesters. The specific objective of this study is to investigate the potential of a BES to identify the impact of a range of simple and complex organic substrates on digester performance and biokinetics.
Material and Methods
Experimental Set-up Lab-scale batch tests were performed using digestate from an operating anaerobic digester at a water resource recovery facility in California. Each test was performed at 35°C. The digestate was collected from the full-scale digester and mixed (mixer speed ~ 300 RPM) in a 15 L batch reactor (Figure 1). After a 2-hour acclimation period, an organic feedstock (0.6 L) was added to the batch reactor. The feedstocks evaluated in this research include acetate, isovalerate and primary sludge (PS).
Probes and Data collection The BES product SENTRY, manufactured by Island Water Systems (Charlottetown, PE, Canada) was employed in this research. The SENTRY BES reports a microbial electron transfer (MET) as a surrogate for biomass activity. One SENTRY probe, a pH sensor (DPD1, Hach Company, Loveland, CO) and an ORP sensor (DRD1, Hach Company, Loveland, CO) were installed in the batch reactor. In between each batch test, all the sensors were kept in the same mixed digestate and before each batch test the sensors were cleaned with a wet cloth. The SENTRY sensor did not require any calibration or chemical cleaning. Grab samples were collected throughout the experiments to measure Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA), soluble COD, NHx-N and Ortho P.
Preliminary Results and Discussion
Figure 2 and 3 show the results of the batch tests, where at time -2h the mixed liquor aliquot is added to the reactor and at time 0 the feedstock is added to the set up. The response of the BES system to different concentrations of acetate is markedly different (Figure 2). The use of an acetate feedstock of 2,000 mg/L and 22,500 mg/L resulted in an in-situ VFA concentration of 190 mg/L (Fig.2, top panel) and 950 mg/L at the start of the experiment (t=0), respectively. In both cases, the BES sensor responds rapidly to the feedstock addition, reaching a maximum level of metabolic activity (maximum MET value) within 1 hour. The complete depletion of acetate can be identified because the sensor response returns to steady state condition and the VFA concentration in the reactor returns to the baseline (i.e., pre-feedstock addition) level. Figure 3 shows the response of the sensor to three different sources of feedstock: Sodium Acetate (top), Isovaleric Acid (middle) and Primary Sludge (bottom). For the two complex feedstocks (isovaleric acid and primary sludge), the BES sensor response to the feedstock addition was slower and the metabolic activity (MET) continued to slowly increase while the substrate was converted to acetate (increase in VFA). Once the complex substrate was converted to acetate, the readily biodegradable matter was then depleted (decrease in VFA concentration) and the sensor response decreased until returning to the baseline level. Figure 4 shows, for all the experiments, the MET increase rate in the first 1 hour from the feedstock addition and the VFA decrease/increase rate in the first 2 hours. Initial VFA uptake rates increased proportionally with higher initial VFA concentrations. However, at high initial concentrations – the initial VFA degradation rates appear to have reached a maximum (Figure 4, top left), suggesting a Monod kinetics model. The change in the initial MET signal shows a similar trend (Figure 4, top right): at higher substrate concentrations corresponds a higher MET increased rate until it reaches a maximum response. Overall the BES response shows a strong correlation to the initial VFA uptake rates (Figure 4, bottom panel), although this correlation does not reflect the impact of the initial VFA concentration on the change in the BES signal. Preliminary results from this research suggest that the signal from a BES is influenced by the initial substrate concentration and substrate biodegradability. Our current experiments are focused on evaluating the reproducibility of these results using additional feedstocks and evaluating the reproducibility of BES results using digestate biomass from other WRRFs. These results will be included as part of the full paper submission and presentation. Collectively, our study suggests that a BES can be used to monitor anaerobic digesters and detect upset events, since the sensor's bacteria are a good reflection of the digester's biomass composition and behaviour. Furthermore, the BES signal can be employed as part of a process control strategy to optimize digester feeding and mitigate overloading the digesters.
Bioelectrochemical based sensors (BES) have recently emerged as tools to monitor biological processes. This study investigates the potential of a BES to identify the impact of different organic substrates on digester performance. The sensor shows to respond to the substrate uptake rate and may provide a surrogate for the substrate hydrolysis rate. BES sensors show a potential application in in predictive capacity and could help utilities integrating the treatment of high strength organics.
SpeakerCecconi, Francesca
Presentation time
09:25:00
09:40:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Intelligent Water, Research and Innovation
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Intelligent Water, Research and Innovation
Author(s)
Cecconi, Francesca
Author(s)F. Cecconi1; Y. Tse2; V. Rajasekharan3; S. Sathyamoorthy4
Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA1; Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA2; Hach, Loveland, CO3; Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158531
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count10

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10083970
Get access
-10083970
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
Abstract
Introduction and Background
The use of bioelectrochemical sensors (BESs) to monitor biological processes in engineered environmental systems has received increasing interest in recent years. The BES is an electrochemical devise, based on the electrochemical interactions of microorganisms and enzymes with the electrodes. The signal produced using this sensor is a direct result of the microbial activity within the BES. In detail, it relies on the ability of some bacteria to transfer electrons from a reduced electron donor, the substrate, to a solid electrode material called anode, which is the electron acceptor. The anode is connected, via an external electrical circuit, to the cathode, which is covered by bacteria that catalyze the reduction of an oxidized electron acceptor (Lovley, 2011). The potential benefits of using these sensors include provide early warnings of biological process upsets, detect inhibitory effects of shock loads and toxic content and monitor nutrient depletion (Grattieri et al, 2017). Anaerobic processes, especially anaerobic digestion and co-digestion systems, could benefit from the implementation of these sensors to monitor the process performance, given their high operational complexity in managing the variation in feedstock composition, complex metabolic properties and feeding strategies. However, open questions remain on the efficacy and reproducibility of BESs. Our research aims to fill knowledge gaps related to feasibility of using BESs to monitor and predict the performance of anaerobic digesters. The specific objective of this study is to investigate the potential of a BES to identify the impact of a range of simple and complex organic substrates on digester performance and biokinetics.
Material and Methods
Experimental Set-up Lab-scale batch tests were performed using digestate from an operating anaerobic digester at a water resource recovery facility in California. Each test was performed at 35°C. The digestate was collected from the full-scale digester and mixed (mixer speed ~ 300 RPM) in a 15 L batch reactor (Figure 1). After a 2-hour acclimation period, an organic feedstock (0.6 L) was added to the batch reactor. The feedstocks evaluated in this research include acetate, isovalerate and primary sludge (PS).
Probes and Data collection The BES product SENTRY, manufactured by Island Water Systems (Charlottetown, PE, Canada) was employed in this research. The SENTRY BES reports a microbial electron transfer (MET) as a surrogate for biomass activity. One SENTRY probe, a pH sensor (DPD1, Hach Company, Loveland, CO) and an ORP sensor (DRD1, Hach Company, Loveland, CO) were installed in the batch reactor. In between each batch test, all the sensors were kept in the same mixed digestate and before each batch test the sensors were cleaned with a wet cloth. The SENTRY sensor did not require any calibration or chemical cleaning. Grab samples were collected throughout the experiments to measure Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA), soluble COD, NHx-N and Ortho P.
Preliminary Results and Discussion
Figure 2 and 3 show the results of the batch tests, where at time -2h the mixed liquor aliquot is added to the reactor and at time 0 the feedstock is added to the set up. The response of the BES system to different concentrations of acetate is markedly different (Figure 2). The use of an acetate feedstock of 2,000 mg/L and 22,500 mg/L resulted in an in-situ VFA concentration of 190 mg/L (Fig.2, top panel) and 950 mg/L at the start of the experiment (t=0), respectively. In both cases, the BES sensor responds rapidly to the feedstock addition, reaching a maximum level of metabolic activity (maximum MET value) within 1 hour. The complete depletion of acetate can be identified because the sensor response returns to steady state condition and the VFA concentration in the reactor returns to the baseline (i.e., pre-feedstock addition) level. Figure 3 shows the response of the sensor to three different sources of feedstock: Sodium Acetate (top), Isovaleric Acid (middle) and Primary Sludge (bottom). For the two complex feedstocks (isovaleric acid and primary sludge), the BES sensor response to the feedstock addition was slower and the metabolic activity (MET) continued to slowly increase while the substrate was converted to acetate (increase in VFA). Once the complex substrate was converted to acetate, the readily biodegradable matter was then depleted (decrease in VFA concentration) and the sensor response decreased until returning to the baseline level. Figure 4 shows, for all the experiments, the MET increase rate in the first 1 hour from the feedstock addition and the VFA decrease/increase rate in the first 2 hours. Initial VFA uptake rates increased proportionally with higher initial VFA concentrations. However, at high initial concentrations – the initial VFA degradation rates appear to have reached a maximum (Figure 4, top left), suggesting a Monod kinetics model. The change in the initial MET signal shows a similar trend (Figure 4, top right): at higher substrate concentrations corresponds a higher MET increased rate until it reaches a maximum response. Overall the BES response shows a strong correlation to the initial VFA uptake rates (Figure 4, bottom panel), although this correlation does not reflect the impact of the initial VFA concentration on the change in the BES signal. Preliminary results from this research suggest that the signal from a BES is influenced by the initial substrate concentration and substrate biodegradability. Our current experiments are focused on evaluating the reproducibility of these results using additional feedstocks and evaluating the reproducibility of BES results using digestate biomass from other WRRFs. These results will be included as part of the full paper submission and presentation. Collectively, our study suggests that a BES can be used to monitor anaerobic digesters and detect upset events, since the sensor's bacteria are a good reflection of the digester's biomass composition and behaviour. Furthermore, the BES signal can be employed as part of a process control strategy to optimize digester feeding and mitigate overloading the digesters.
Bioelectrochemical based sensors (BES) have recently emerged as tools to monitor biological processes. This study investigates the potential of a BES to identify the impact of different organic substrates on digester performance. The sensor shows to respond to the substrate uptake rate and may provide a surrogate for the substrate hydrolysis rate. BES sensors show a potential application in in predictive capacity and could help utilities integrating the treatment of high strength organics.
SpeakerCecconi, Francesca
Presentation time
09:25:00
09:40:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Intelligent Water, Research and Innovation
TopicIntermediate Level, Biosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Intelligent Water, Research and Innovation
Author(s)
Cecconi, Francesca
Author(s)F. Cecconi1; Y. Tse2; V. Rajasekharan3; S. Sathyamoorthy4
Author affiliation(s)Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA1; Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA2; Hach, Loveland, CO3; Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158531
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count10

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Cecconi, Francesca. The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 28 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10083970CITANCHOR>.
Cecconi, Francesca. The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed June 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083970CITANCHOR.
Cecconi, Francesca
The Key To Predict Anaerobic Processes Performance: Bioelectrochemical Sensors
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 12, 2022
June 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083970CITANCHOR