lastID = -10108641
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best...
Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2024-06-17 15:50:48 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2024-06-17 15:09:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2024-06-17 14:46:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2024-06-17 11:14:45 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best...
Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!

Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!

Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best...
Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!
Abstract
BACKGROUND The William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility (WEDWRF) is in Pinellas County, Florida and is operated by Pinellas County Utilities to treat wastewater collected from the County's northern service area, and to generate reclaimed water supply for the County's reuse distribution system. The WEDWRF is a 9.0 MGD capacity advanced 5-Stage Bardenpho process wastewater treatment facility that currently operates at an annual average flow of approximately 6.5 MGD. The existing solids management system for the WEDWRF includes two (2) rotary drum thickeners (RDT) for thickening waste activated sludge (WAS), two open top sludge holding tanks, two (2) belt filter presses (BFP) and truck loading bay. The existing BFP are old and require replacement. A pilot scale dewatering study was conducted with the following objectives: 1.Evaluate the dewatering performance of new belt filter press and centrifuge. 2.Optimize the polymer dosage to maximize cake solids and solids capture. 3.The efficacy of generating thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using RDT to thicken WAS prior to dewatering or bypass the RDT to directly dewater WAS as an operational, energy and polymer cost saving measure. 4.Analyze composite samples of centrate/filtrate stream for Chemical oxygen demand (COD), Ammonia and Phosphorous to determine the quality of the reject stream back to the headworks. 5.Perform life cycle cost analysis of dewatering operation and maintenance for BFP and Centrifuge. PILOT TESTING SCHEDULE The pilot testing was conducted between April 18, 2023 - June 6, 2023. Alfa Laval's BFP was tested between April 18 - April 20 for WAS, April 25 - April 27 for TWAS. Andritz centrifuge was tested between May 9 - May 11 for WAS, May 15 - May 17 for TWAS. Alfa Laval's centrifuge was tested between May 23 - May 25 for WAS, June 5 - June 6 for TWAS. A filtrate/centrate stream composite sample was collected on each day of pilot testing for both WAS and TWAS. RESULTS 1.Waste Activated Sludge The percent cake solids (%TS) obtained for WAS in Alfa Laval BFP ranged between 16.8-18.5% for the polymer dosage ranging between 10.0-16.8 lb/Ton. The solids capture for BFP was between 95 - 99%. Similarly, the percent cake solids (%) obtained for Andritz and Alfa Laval Centrifuge ranged between 20.0-24.5% for polymer dosage ranging between 14.5-62.9 lb/Ton for Andritz centrifuge and 13.2-35.7 lb/Ton for Alfa Laval centrifuge. The solids capture for Andritz centrifuge ranged between 89-96% and Alfa Laval centrifuge ranged between 94-99%. 2.Thickened Waste Activated Sludge The percent cake solids (%TS) obtained for TWAS in Alfa Laval BFP ranged between 15.8-17.7% for the polymer dosage ranging between 7.3-11.4 lb/Ton. The solids capture for BFP was between 96-99%. Similarly, the percent cake solids (%) obtained for Andritz and Alfa Laval Centrifuge ranged between 18.7-22.7% for polymer dosage ranging between 18.7-44.8 lb/Ton for Andritz centrifuge and 27.0-32.0 lb/Ton for Alfa Laval centrifuge. The solids capture for Andritz centrifuge was between 84-99% and Alfa Laval centrifuge ranged between 94-99%. 3.Centrate/Filtrate Analysis A composite sample of centrate/filtrate was collected on each day of pilot testing for both WAS and TWAS. For WAS centrate stream, the concentrations of COD ranged between 60 - 470 ppm, ammoniacal nitrogen between 0.1 - 0.3 ppm, total phosphorus between 2 - 48 ppm. For TWAS centrate stream, the concentrations of COD ranged between 102 - 2,440 ppm, ammoniacal nitrogen between 0 -150 ppm, and total phosphorus between 133 - 490 ppm. It is noteworthy to mention that the concentration of analytes reported here as received from the contracted laboratory. The key observations in the filtrate/centrate composite sample analysis are: 1.Concentration of the analytes appear to be lower during the belt filter press dewatering operation when compared to the centrifuge dewatering operation. 2.Concentration of analytes for TWAS filtrate/centrate stream appear to be significantly higher than for WAS. This indicates that there is release of nutrients in the holding tank. 3.The P concentration in the filtrate for TWAS appears to be in high enough concentrations that it could lead to the formation of struvite in the facility. This could decrease the dewaterability of the sludge and create maintenance issues, due to buildup in pipes and valves, at the facility. KEY TAKE-AWAYS The pilot testing results indicate that both BFP and centrifuge technology could be suitable for WEDWRF dewatering improvements. The BFP consistently achieved a cake solids concentration of 17.5 (%TS) for WAS. In the case of TWAS, the average percent cake solids were about 17.0 (%TS). Similarly, both the centrifuges performed better than BFP producing cake solids at an average of 22.0-23.0 (%TS) for WAS and 20.0 (%TS) for TWAS. However, the polymer consumption in the case of centrifuge was at least twice as much as BFP polymer consumption for both WAS and TWAS to achieve a 3-5% increase in percent cake solids. The centrate/filtrate composite analysis samples showed interesting observations with high concentrations of nutrients for TWAS. This could be attributed to the release of nutrients in the sludge holding tank. A determination of the exact duration and conditions that would cause this release of nutrients and soluble COD is something the pilot did not focus on. An understanding of the impacts of sludge degradation in sludge holding tanks especially in hot summer months is important for this and many other plants that use sludge holding tanks as buffers to limit plant dewatering operations schedules to only a few days a week. This could also impact the dewaterability of TWAS which was evident as the cake solids (%) obtained in TWAS was relatively lower than WAS. Furthermore, higher nutrient and COD loading in the centrate stream recycled to the headworks of the plant could lead to increase in aeration demands to treat the increased ammonia load . Similarly, there could be an impact in disinfection chlorine demand. To conclude, both BFP and centrifuge should be evaluated for both WAS and TWAS to have a complete understanding of overall life-cycle cost implications on each of those equipment. Life cycle cost analysis will be performed and presented by the time of Residuals and Biosolids Conference in 2024. This presentation will cover the pilot testing equipment operating parameters, feed characteristics, relationship between wastewater sludge cake solids and polymer consumption of dewatering WAS and TWAS, important parameters for plant operations decision making. Furthermore, the presentation touches upon nutrient and COD impacts of dewatering recycle streams and their potential impacts on plant effluent limits. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The presenters thank Pinellas County Utilities, Alfa Laval, and Andritz for providing pilot testing equipment trailers and for assisting during the pilot testing phase.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference, June 18-21, 2024.
Presentation time
14:30:00
15:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
SessionDewatering
Session number05
Session locationOklahoma City Convention Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
TopicBelt Filter Press, Biosolids, Dewatering
TopicBelt Filter Press, Biosolids, Dewatering
Author(s)
Oberoi, Pooja
Author(s)P. Oberoi1, S. Sivaprasad1, M. Moncholi1, J. Ayala-Lugo1, S. Meikle1, D. Lyons2, T. Menke2
Author affiliation(s)Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Pinellas County Utilities 2; Pinellas County Utilities 2;
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jun 2024
DOI10.2175/193864718825159417
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2024
Word count28

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best...
Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10108641
Get access
-10108641
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best...
Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!
Abstract
BACKGROUND The William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility (WEDWRF) is in Pinellas County, Florida and is operated by Pinellas County Utilities to treat wastewater collected from the County's northern service area, and to generate reclaimed water supply for the County's reuse distribution system. The WEDWRF is a 9.0 MGD capacity advanced 5-Stage Bardenpho process wastewater treatment facility that currently operates at an annual average flow of approximately 6.5 MGD. The existing solids management system for the WEDWRF includes two (2) rotary drum thickeners (RDT) for thickening waste activated sludge (WAS), two open top sludge holding tanks, two (2) belt filter presses (BFP) and truck loading bay. The existing BFP are old and require replacement. A pilot scale dewatering study was conducted with the following objectives: 1.Evaluate the dewatering performance of new belt filter press and centrifuge. 2.Optimize the polymer dosage to maximize cake solids and solids capture. 3.The efficacy of generating thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using RDT to thicken WAS prior to dewatering or bypass the RDT to directly dewater WAS as an operational, energy and polymer cost saving measure. 4.Analyze composite samples of centrate/filtrate stream for Chemical oxygen demand (COD), Ammonia and Phosphorous to determine the quality of the reject stream back to the headworks. 5.Perform life cycle cost analysis of dewatering operation and maintenance for BFP and Centrifuge. PILOT TESTING SCHEDULE The pilot testing was conducted between April 18, 2023 - June 6, 2023. Alfa Laval's BFP was tested between April 18 - April 20 for WAS, April 25 - April 27 for TWAS. Andritz centrifuge was tested between May 9 - May 11 for WAS, May 15 - May 17 for TWAS. Alfa Laval's centrifuge was tested between May 23 - May 25 for WAS, June 5 - June 6 for TWAS. A filtrate/centrate stream composite sample was collected on each day of pilot testing for both WAS and TWAS. RESULTS 1.Waste Activated Sludge The percent cake solids (%TS) obtained for WAS in Alfa Laval BFP ranged between 16.8-18.5% for the polymer dosage ranging between 10.0-16.8 lb/Ton. The solids capture for BFP was between 95 - 99%. Similarly, the percent cake solids (%) obtained for Andritz and Alfa Laval Centrifuge ranged between 20.0-24.5% for polymer dosage ranging between 14.5-62.9 lb/Ton for Andritz centrifuge and 13.2-35.7 lb/Ton for Alfa Laval centrifuge. The solids capture for Andritz centrifuge ranged between 89-96% and Alfa Laval centrifuge ranged between 94-99%. 2.Thickened Waste Activated Sludge The percent cake solids (%TS) obtained for TWAS in Alfa Laval BFP ranged between 15.8-17.7% for the polymer dosage ranging between 7.3-11.4 lb/Ton. The solids capture for BFP was between 96-99%. Similarly, the percent cake solids (%) obtained for Andritz and Alfa Laval Centrifuge ranged between 18.7-22.7% for polymer dosage ranging between 18.7-44.8 lb/Ton for Andritz centrifuge and 27.0-32.0 lb/Ton for Alfa Laval centrifuge. The solids capture for Andritz centrifuge was between 84-99% and Alfa Laval centrifuge ranged between 94-99%. 3.Centrate/Filtrate Analysis A composite sample of centrate/filtrate was collected on each day of pilot testing for both WAS and TWAS. For WAS centrate stream, the concentrations of COD ranged between 60 - 470 ppm, ammoniacal nitrogen between 0.1 - 0.3 ppm, total phosphorus between 2 - 48 ppm. For TWAS centrate stream, the concentrations of COD ranged between 102 - 2,440 ppm, ammoniacal nitrogen between 0 -150 ppm, and total phosphorus between 133 - 490 ppm. It is noteworthy to mention that the concentration of analytes reported here as received from the contracted laboratory. The key observations in the filtrate/centrate composite sample analysis are: 1.Concentration of the analytes appear to be lower during the belt filter press dewatering operation when compared to the centrifuge dewatering operation. 2.Concentration of analytes for TWAS filtrate/centrate stream appear to be significantly higher than for WAS. This indicates that there is release of nutrients in the holding tank. 3.The P concentration in the filtrate for TWAS appears to be in high enough concentrations that it could lead to the formation of struvite in the facility. This could decrease the dewaterability of the sludge and create maintenance issues, due to buildup in pipes and valves, at the facility. KEY TAKE-AWAYS The pilot testing results indicate that both BFP and centrifuge technology could be suitable for WEDWRF dewatering improvements. The BFP consistently achieved a cake solids concentration of 17.5 (%TS) for WAS. In the case of TWAS, the average percent cake solids were about 17.0 (%TS). Similarly, both the centrifuges performed better than BFP producing cake solids at an average of 22.0-23.0 (%TS) for WAS and 20.0 (%TS) for TWAS. However, the polymer consumption in the case of centrifuge was at least twice as much as BFP polymer consumption for both WAS and TWAS to achieve a 3-5% increase in percent cake solids. The centrate/filtrate composite analysis samples showed interesting observations with high concentrations of nutrients for TWAS. This could be attributed to the release of nutrients in the sludge holding tank. A determination of the exact duration and conditions that would cause this release of nutrients and soluble COD is something the pilot did not focus on. An understanding of the impacts of sludge degradation in sludge holding tanks especially in hot summer months is important for this and many other plants that use sludge holding tanks as buffers to limit plant dewatering operations schedules to only a few days a week. This could also impact the dewaterability of TWAS which was evident as the cake solids (%) obtained in TWAS was relatively lower than WAS. Furthermore, higher nutrient and COD loading in the centrate stream recycled to the headworks of the plant could lead to increase in aeration demands to treat the increased ammonia load . Similarly, there could be an impact in disinfection chlorine demand. To conclude, both BFP and centrifuge should be evaluated for both WAS and TWAS to have a complete understanding of overall life-cycle cost implications on each of those equipment. Life cycle cost analysis will be performed and presented by the time of Residuals and Biosolids Conference in 2024. This presentation will cover the pilot testing equipment operating parameters, feed characteristics, relationship between wastewater sludge cake solids and polymer consumption of dewatering WAS and TWAS, important parameters for plant operations decision making. Furthermore, the presentation touches upon nutrient and COD impacts of dewatering recycle streams and their potential impacts on plant effluent limits. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The presenters thank Pinellas County Utilities, Alfa Laval, and Andritz for providing pilot testing equipment trailers and for assisting during the pilot testing phase.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference, June 18-21, 2024.
Presentation time
14:30:00
15:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
SessionDewatering
Session number05
Session locationOklahoma City Convention Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
TopicBelt Filter Press, Biosolids, Dewatering
TopicBelt Filter Press, Biosolids, Dewatering
Author(s)
Oberoi, Pooja
Author(s)P. Oberoi1, S. Sivaprasad1, M. Moncholi1, J. Ayala-Lugo1, S. Meikle1, D. Lyons2, T. Menke2
Author affiliation(s)Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Stantec 1; Pinellas County Utilities 2; Pinellas County Utilities 2;
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jun 2024
DOI10.2175/193864718825159417
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2024
Word count28

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Oberoi, Pooja. Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!. Water Environment Federation, 2024. Web. 16 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10108641CITANCHOR>.
Oberoi, Pooja. Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!. Water Environment Federation, 2024. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10108641CITANCHOR.
Oberoi, Pooja
Knock Out, Drag Out Fight: Centrifuge vs. Belt Filter Press - Title for Best Dewatering Technology to Squeeze the Poop at William. E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility!
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
June 19, 2024
June 16, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10108641CITANCHOR