lastID = -10108656
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery...
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2024-06-17 15:48:59 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2024-06-17 15:10:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2024-06-17 14:45:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2024-06-17 11:15:29 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery...
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility

Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility

Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery...
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility
Abstract
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Anish Luthra, PE, PMP, CDM Smith Kathryn Quaid, CDM Smith Muriel Steele, PhD, PE, Charlotte Water Charlotte Water's McDowell Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has historically faced biosolids dewatering challenges related to achieving typical industry cake dryness for belt filter press dewatering of anaerobically digested biosolids. This presentation will discuss the dewatering benefits experienced by the plant by piloting a solids-liquid-gas (SLG) pretreatment process ahead of belt filter press dewatering. The plant's processes include screening, grit removal, primary clarification, 5-stage BNR for nitrogen and phosphorus removal, secondary clarification, deep-bed sand filters, UV disinfection, cascade aeration, gravity belt WAS thickening, mesophilic anaerobic digesters, and dewatering belt filter presses. Anaerobically digested solids from four primary digesters overflow into a single, common secondary digester. From the secondary digester, digested solids are pumped to the dewatering facility for final dewatering via Ashbrook belt filter presses. Dewatered cake is conveyed by a belt conveyor to a covered storage area before being loaded onto hauling trucks typically for land application, or alternatively landfill disposal. In recent years, the plant has struggled to produce dewatered cake total solids concentrations above 12.5% on average. In early 2023, Charlotte Water elected to pilot the solids-liquid-gas (SLG) pretreatment process offered by Orege to optimize the dewatering operations at the McDowell Creek WWTP. The SLG technology is composed of three parts - the SLG skid, an air compressor, and a deaerator. The SLG technology uses compressed air to modify the rheology of the digested sludge upstream of belt filter press. Low pressure compressed air is injected into the digested sludge, creating a floating emulsion sludge. Polymer is then added to the emulsion to complete the flocculation process ahead of dewatering. The emulsion's larger solids surface area improves polymer adherence, resulting in better water release and higher cake dryness. Before the pilot was commissioned, Charlotte Water developed pilot evaluation criteria containing a variety of measurable and subjective goals to determine pilot success. Pilot logistics were then established through a collaboration between Charlotte Water, CDM Smith, and Orege. It was determined that the plant's existing digested sludge pumps that normally feed the belt filter presses would not have enough head to overcome the pressure of the SLG unit. As such, a temporary 1000-gallon sludge buffer tank and additional sludge pump were provided. Temporary piping was installed to feed the buffer tank, sludge pump, SLG skid, deaerator, and belt filter press. A variety of polymer selections were also evaluated as part of the pilot to determine compatibility with the SLG emulsion. Once the pilot was commissioned, the baseline verification period began. The project team observed Charlotte Water's operation of the belt filter press under typical operating conditions and collected and analyzed baseline samples to compare against historical data. After a week of baseline verification, the pilot moved into the optimization period. During this period the belt filter press was started under typical operating conditions by Charlotte Water and baseline samples were collected before the SLG unit was started up for the day. During the three months of optimization, the project team made process adjustments to the SLG unit and belt filter press to determine the optimal operating parameters for pilot operation. Once the optimal pilot operating parameters were determined, the field staff performed a two-week field test. During the field test, the belt filter press was started under normal operating conditions and baseline samples were collected and analyzed. Then, the SLG unit was started up and optimal pilot operating parameters were set. Multiple samples were taken throughout the SLG run time before the unit was shut down and the belt filter press was adjusted back to normal parameters for a second round of baseline sampling. This process was repeated for 10 days, during which baseline parameters remained consistent and SLG parameters remained consistent. The pilot results suggested the SLG pretreatment process improved cake dryness by an average of approximately 2% total solids concentration. This is a significant improvement from the historical performance of McDowell Creek WWTP's dewatering operations. Polymer treatment rate and filtrate quality remained similar to baseline conditions. Table 1 contains average field test results and historical data. Figures 1-3 present daily average cake, filtrate, and polymer treatment rate results from the field test period. The project team is currently performing a lifecycle cost analysis to evaluate the capital cost investment of the SLG pretreatment process and the annual cost savings associated with the operational improvements of the SLG process, which will be ready for presentation by the time of the 2024 Water Environment Federation (WEF) Residuals and Biosolids Conference.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference, June 18-21, 2024.
SpeakerLuthra, Anish
Presentation time
13:30:00
14:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
SessionDewatering
Session number05
Session locationOklahoma City Convention Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
TopicDewatering, Dewatering Optimization, Dewatering Pretreatment
TopicDewatering, Dewatering Optimization, Dewatering Pretreatment
Author(s)
Luthra, Anish
Author(s)A. Luthra1, K. Quaid1, M. Steele2
Author affiliation(s)CDM Smith Inc. 1; Charlotte Water 2;
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jun 2024
DOI10.2175/193864718825159432
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2024
Word count14

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery...
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10108656
Get access
-10108656
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery...
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility
Abstract
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Anish Luthra, PE, PMP, CDM Smith Kathryn Quaid, CDM Smith Muriel Steele, PhD, PE, Charlotte Water Charlotte Water's McDowell Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has historically faced biosolids dewatering challenges related to achieving typical industry cake dryness for belt filter press dewatering of anaerobically digested biosolids. This presentation will discuss the dewatering benefits experienced by the plant by piloting a solids-liquid-gas (SLG) pretreatment process ahead of belt filter press dewatering. The plant's processes include screening, grit removal, primary clarification, 5-stage BNR for nitrogen and phosphorus removal, secondary clarification, deep-bed sand filters, UV disinfection, cascade aeration, gravity belt WAS thickening, mesophilic anaerobic digesters, and dewatering belt filter presses. Anaerobically digested solids from four primary digesters overflow into a single, common secondary digester. From the secondary digester, digested solids are pumped to the dewatering facility for final dewatering via Ashbrook belt filter presses. Dewatered cake is conveyed by a belt conveyor to a covered storage area before being loaded onto hauling trucks typically for land application, or alternatively landfill disposal. In recent years, the plant has struggled to produce dewatered cake total solids concentrations above 12.5% on average. In early 2023, Charlotte Water elected to pilot the solids-liquid-gas (SLG) pretreatment process offered by Orege to optimize the dewatering operations at the McDowell Creek WWTP. The SLG technology is composed of three parts - the SLG skid, an air compressor, and a deaerator. The SLG technology uses compressed air to modify the rheology of the digested sludge upstream of belt filter press. Low pressure compressed air is injected into the digested sludge, creating a floating emulsion sludge. Polymer is then added to the emulsion to complete the flocculation process ahead of dewatering. The emulsion's larger solids surface area improves polymer adherence, resulting in better water release and higher cake dryness. Before the pilot was commissioned, Charlotte Water developed pilot evaluation criteria containing a variety of measurable and subjective goals to determine pilot success. Pilot logistics were then established through a collaboration between Charlotte Water, CDM Smith, and Orege. It was determined that the plant's existing digested sludge pumps that normally feed the belt filter presses would not have enough head to overcome the pressure of the SLG unit. As such, a temporary 1000-gallon sludge buffer tank and additional sludge pump were provided. Temporary piping was installed to feed the buffer tank, sludge pump, SLG skid, deaerator, and belt filter press. A variety of polymer selections were also evaluated as part of the pilot to determine compatibility with the SLG emulsion. Once the pilot was commissioned, the baseline verification period began. The project team observed Charlotte Water's operation of the belt filter press under typical operating conditions and collected and analyzed baseline samples to compare against historical data. After a week of baseline verification, the pilot moved into the optimization period. During this period the belt filter press was started under typical operating conditions by Charlotte Water and baseline samples were collected before the SLG unit was started up for the day. During the three months of optimization, the project team made process adjustments to the SLG unit and belt filter press to determine the optimal operating parameters for pilot operation. Once the optimal pilot operating parameters were determined, the field staff performed a two-week field test. During the field test, the belt filter press was started under normal operating conditions and baseline samples were collected and analyzed. Then, the SLG unit was started up and optimal pilot operating parameters were set. Multiple samples were taken throughout the SLG run time before the unit was shut down and the belt filter press was adjusted back to normal parameters for a second round of baseline sampling. This process was repeated for 10 days, during which baseline parameters remained consistent and SLG parameters remained consistent. The pilot results suggested the SLG pretreatment process improved cake dryness by an average of approximately 2% total solids concentration. This is a significant improvement from the historical performance of McDowell Creek WWTP's dewatering operations. Polymer treatment rate and filtrate quality remained similar to baseline conditions. Table 1 contains average field test results and historical data. Figures 1-3 present daily average cake, filtrate, and polymer treatment rate results from the field test period. The project team is currently performing a lifecycle cost analysis to evaluate the capital cost investment of the SLG pretreatment process and the annual cost savings associated with the operational improvements of the SLG process, which will be ready for presentation by the time of the 2024 Water Environment Federation (WEF) Residuals and Biosolids Conference.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference, June 18-21, 2024.
SpeakerLuthra, Anish
Presentation time
13:30:00
14:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
SessionDewatering
Session number05
Session locationOklahoma City Convention Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
TopicDewatering, Dewatering Optimization, Dewatering Pretreatment
TopicDewatering, Dewatering Optimization, Dewatering Pretreatment
Author(s)
Luthra, Anish
Author(s)A. Luthra1, K. Quaid1, M. Steele2
Author affiliation(s)CDM Smith Inc. 1; Charlotte Water 2;
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jun 2024
DOI10.2175/193864718825159432
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2024
Word count14

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Luthra, Anish. Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility. Water Environment Federation, 2024. Web. 19 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10108656CITANCHOR>.
Luthra, Anish. Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility. Water Environment Federation, 2024. Accessed June 19, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10108656CITANCHOR.
Luthra, Anish
Dewatering Benefits of SLG Technology at the McDowell Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
June 19, 2024
June 19, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10108656CITANCHOR