Access Water | Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
lastID = -10118669
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:25:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 07:05:55 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 15:53:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:52:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:04:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:12:41 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate

Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate

Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (Warren Facility) is owned and operated by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD). The facility has an average daily dry-weather flow capacity of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) and employs a high-purity oxygen activated sludge (HPOAS) process (Figure 1). Non-nitrified secondary effluent (SE) is chlorinated and discharged to the ocean. LACSD has been investigating nitrogen management options that may be implemented at the Warren Facility to address two drivers: (1) effluent reuse for the Pure Water Southern California (PWSC) program which will produce 150 mgd of purified water and (2) total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) load reduction for ocean discharge. PWSC processes that will be implemented are shown in Figure 2. Implementing nitrification-denitrification (NdN) within PWSC is projected to result in a net reduction in the TIN load discharged to the ocean (~ 49%) relative to continued operation with HPOAS. However, LACSD is proactively investigating alternative approaches to enhance load reduction beyond that achieved by implementing PWSC. Outside of conventional strategies to increase nitrogen removal, the elevated mass of nitrate in the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC) provides a unique opportunity to reduce ocean nitrogen discharge. While uncommon, approaches considered to denitrify ROC typically incorporate biofilms and high levels of carbon dosing. This paper presents a novel approach developed by LACSD that leverages the nitrate-rich ROC and ammonia-rich HPOAS secondary effluent (SE) (Figure 2, Streams 5 and 7) utilizing a carbon efficient partial denitrification-anammox (PdNA) process. In this approach, ROC and SE would be blended at a target NH4-N/NOx-N ratio in a reactor and supplemental carbon added to drive PdNA (Figure 3). The objectives of this study were to (1) conduct proof-of-concept testing of the ROC/SE Blend PdNA process and (2) develop design criteria that can be used for planning level full-scale process sizing and cost estimation. PILOT SYSTEM AND RESULTS The ROC/SE Blend PdNA pilot system included a batch blend tank, feed pump, single-stage PdNA moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), and supplemental carbon (MicroC 2000) dosing system (Figure 4, Table 1). Supplemental phosphorous (H3PO4) was added directly to the batch blend tank. Seeded MBBR media was taken from an existing mainstream PdNA pilot system that has been in operation at the Warren Facility for over a year (Sun et al., 2024). ROC was produced at the PWSC Grace F. Napolitano Innovation Center (NIC) 0.5 mgd reverse osmosis facility. However, ROC was not always available during testing due to facility shutdowns. Therefore, for part of the study, reactor feed was prepared by spiking SE with NaNO3 or by spiking NaNO3 and NaCl to target the desired NH4-INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
The A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (Warren Facility) is owned and operated by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD). The facility has an average daily dry-weather flow capacity of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) and employs a high-purity oxygen activated sludge (HPOAS) process (Figure 1). Non-nitrified secondary effluent (SE) is chlorinated and discharged to the ocean. LACSD has been investigating nitrogen management options that may be implemented at the Warren Facility to address two drivers: (1) effluent reuse for the Pure Water Southern California (PWSC) program which will produce 150 mgd of purified water and (2) total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) load reduction for ocean discharge. PWSC processes that will be implemented are shown in Figure 2.

Implementing nitrification-denitrification (NdN) within PWSC is projected to result in a net reduction in the TIN load discharged to the ocean (~ 49%) relative to continued operation with HPOAS. However, LACSD is proactively investigating alternative approaches to enhance load reduction beyond that achieved by implementing PWSC. Outside of conventional strategies to increase nitrogen removal, the elevated mass of nitrate in the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC) provides a unique opportunity to reduce ocean nitrogen discharge. While uncommon, approaches considered to denitrify ROC typically incorporate biofilms and high levels of carbon dosing. This paper presents a novel approach developed by LACSD that leverages the nitrate-rich ROC and ammonia-rich HPOAS secondary effluent (SE) (Figure 2, Streams 5 and 7) utilizing a carbon efficient partial denitrification-anammox (PdNA) process. In this approach, ROC and SE would be blended at a target NH4-N/NOx-N ratio in a reactor and supplemental carbon added to drive PdNA (Figure 3).

The objectives of this study were to (1) conduct proof-of-concept testing of the ROC/SE Blend PdNA process and (2) develop design criteria that can be used for planning level full-scale process sizing and cost estimation.

PILOT SYSTEM AND RESULTS
The ROC/SE Blend PdNA pilot system included a batch blend tank, feed pump, single-stage PdNA moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), and supplemental carbon (MicroC 2000) dosing system (Figure 4, Table 1). Supplemental phosphorous (H3PO4) was added directly to the batch blend tank. Seeded MBBR media was taken from an existing mainstream PdNA pilot system that has been in operation at the Warren Facility for over a year (Sun et al., 2024). ROC was produced at the PWSC Grace F. Napolitano Innovation Center (NIC) 0.5 mgd reverse osmosis facility. However, ROC was not always available during testing due to facility shutdowns. Therefore, for part of the study, reactor feed was prepared by spiking SE with NaNO3 or by spiking NaNO3 and NaCl to target the desired NH4-N/NOx-N ratio and TDS concentration at similar concentrations to the ROC produced at NIC. Analysis of TIN removal performance data normalized to account for carbon dose did not indicate a statistically significant difference in performance based on TDS concentration.

The pilot system was started up in April 2024 and operated for approximately 5 months. Average conditions over a four-month period of stable operation (May to September 2024) are shown in Table 2. Influent TIN and NH4-N/NOx-N ratio, nitrogen loading rates, and supplemental carbon dose are shown in Figures 5, 6, and 7, respectively. Average influent TIN, NH4-N/NOx-N ratio, and supplemental carbon dose were 74 ± 4 mg N/L, 0.45 ± 0.10 g/g, and 1.9 ± 0.45 g COD added/g TIN influent, respectively. Average influent TIN, NOx, and NH4 loading were 0.55 ± 0.05, 0.38 ± 0.05, and 0.17 ± 0.03 g N/m2-day, respectively.

Performance results are summarized in Table 3. Average TIN, TIN removed via PdNA, NOx, and NH4 removals were 57 ± 16%, 63 ± 14%, 57 ± 15%, and 61 ± 29%, respectively. Corresponding average surface area removal rates were 0.31 ± 0.09 (TIN), 0.22 ± 0.06 (NOx), and 0.10 ± 0.04 (NH4) g N/m2-day. Supplemental carbon dose varied between 0.9 — 2.7 g COD added/g TIN influent and had a significant impact on performance (Figures 8 — 10). As carbon dosing increased or decreased over this range, a corresponding increase or decrease in TIN, NOx, and NH4 removal was observed. TIN, NOx, and NH4 removals ranged between 28 to 84%, 27 to 90%, and 17 to 99%, respectively.

PdN efficiency averaged 55 ± 15% and supplemental carbon demand averaged 3.5 ±0.59 g COD added/g TIN removed. Both parameters generally improved from start-up to the end of the study (Figure 11) and over the last month of stable operation averaged 65 ± 9% and 3.1 ± 0.45 g COD added/g TIN removed. The average PdN efficiency observed in this study is within the range reported in the literature for single-stage PdNA MBBR reactors with glycerol addition: 43 ± 29% g COD/g N (Macmanus et al., 2022) and 88 ± 13% g COD/g N (Klaus et al., 2023). However, the average carbon demand observed was ~ 1 g COD/g N higher, but notably lower than the 5 — 6 g COD/g N removed for glycerol driven FdN observed by Liu et al., 2025.

Planning level cost estimates (AACE Class 5) for full-scale implementation were developed to benchmark against previously evaluated concepts (LACSD 2024). Preliminary estimates suggest that ROC PdNA may be a financially viable approach. The presentation will provide a detailed overview of the pilot system.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
10:30:00
10:45:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionInnovations in Membrane Treatment for Reuse
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicAdvanced Water Treatment and Reuse
TopicAdvanced Water Treatment and Reuse
Author(s)
Mansell, Bruce, Coracero, Ariana, Deco, Rachel, Hsia, Patricia, Le, Tri, Fitzgerald, Colin, Constantine, Timothy, Sun, Yewei, Khunjar, Wendell, Danker, Bryce, Pitt, Paul
Author(s)B. Mansell1, A. Coracero1, R. Deco1, P. Hsia1, T. Le3, C. Fitzgerald3, T. Constantine3, Y. Sun4, W. Khunjar4, B. Danker4, P. Pitt4
Author affiliation(s)LA County Sanitation District1, City of San Mateo2, Jacobs3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825159935
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count8

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118669
Get access
-10118669
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (Warren Facility) is owned and operated by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD). The facility has an average daily dry-weather flow capacity of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) and employs a high-purity oxygen activated sludge (HPOAS) process (Figure 1). Non-nitrified secondary effluent (SE) is chlorinated and discharged to the ocean. LACSD has been investigating nitrogen management options that may be implemented at the Warren Facility to address two drivers: (1) effluent reuse for the Pure Water Southern California (PWSC) program which will produce 150 mgd of purified water and (2) total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) load reduction for ocean discharge. PWSC processes that will be implemented are shown in Figure 2. Implementing nitrification-denitrification (NdN) within PWSC is projected to result in a net reduction in the TIN load discharged to the ocean (~ 49%) relative to continued operation with HPOAS. However, LACSD is proactively investigating alternative approaches to enhance load reduction beyond that achieved by implementing PWSC. Outside of conventional strategies to increase nitrogen removal, the elevated mass of nitrate in the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC) provides a unique opportunity to reduce ocean nitrogen discharge. While uncommon, approaches considered to denitrify ROC typically incorporate biofilms and high levels of carbon dosing. This paper presents a novel approach developed by LACSD that leverages the nitrate-rich ROC and ammonia-rich HPOAS secondary effluent (SE) (Figure 2, Streams 5 and 7) utilizing a carbon efficient partial denitrification-anammox (PdNA) process. In this approach, ROC and SE would be blended at a target NH4-N/NOx-N ratio in a reactor and supplemental carbon added to drive PdNA (Figure 3). The objectives of this study were to (1) conduct proof-of-concept testing of the ROC/SE Blend PdNA process and (2) develop design criteria that can be used for planning level full-scale process sizing and cost estimation. PILOT SYSTEM AND RESULTS The ROC/SE Blend PdNA pilot system included a batch blend tank, feed pump, single-stage PdNA moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), and supplemental carbon (MicroC 2000) dosing system (Figure 4, Table 1). Supplemental phosphorous (H3PO4) was added directly to the batch blend tank. Seeded MBBR media was taken from an existing mainstream PdNA pilot system that has been in operation at the Warren Facility for over a year (Sun et al., 2024). ROC was produced at the PWSC Grace F. Napolitano Innovation Center (NIC) 0.5 mgd reverse osmosis facility. However, ROC was not always available during testing due to facility shutdowns. Therefore, for part of the study, reactor feed was prepared by spiking SE with NaNO3 or by spiking NaNO3 and NaCl to target the desired NH4-INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
The A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (Warren Facility) is owned and operated by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD). The facility has an average daily dry-weather flow capacity of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) and employs a high-purity oxygen activated sludge (HPOAS) process (Figure 1). Non-nitrified secondary effluent (SE) is chlorinated and discharged to the ocean. LACSD has been investigating nitrogen management options that may be implemented at the Warren Facility to address two drivers: (1) effluent reuse for the Pure Water Southern California (PWSC) program which will produce 150 mgd of purified water and (2) total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) load reduction for ocean discharge. PWSC processes that will be implemented are shown in Figure 2.

Implementing nitrification-denitrification (NdN) within PWSC is projected to result in a net reduction in the TIN load discharged to the ocean (~ 49%) relative to continued operation with HPOAS. However, LACSD is proactively investigating alternative approaches to enhance load reduction beyond that achieved by implementing PWSC. Outside of conventional strategies to increase nitrogen removal, the elevated mass of nitrate in the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC) provides a unique opportunity to reduce ocean nitrogen discharge. While uncommon, approaches considered to denitrify ROC typically incorporate biofilms and high levels of carbon dosing. This paper presents a novel approach developed by LACSD that leverages the nitrate-rich ROC and ammonia-rich HPOAS secondary effluent (SE) (Figure 2, Streams 5 and 7) utilizing a carbon efficient partial denitrification-anammox (PdNA) process. In this approach, ROC and SE would be blended at a target NH4-N/NOx-N ratio in a reactor and supplemental carbon added to drive PdNA (Figure 3).

The objectives of this study were to (1) conduct proof-of-concept testing of the ROC/SE Blend PdNA process and (2) develop design criteria that can be used for planning level full-scale process sizing and cost estimation.

PILOT SYSTEM AND RESULTS
The ROC/SE Blend PdNA pilot system included a batch blend tank, feed pump, single-stage PdNA moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), and supplemental carbon (MicroC 2000) dosing system (Figure 4, Table 1). Supplemental phosphorous (H3PO4) was added directly to the batch blend tank. Seeded MBBR media was taken from an existing mainstream PdNA pilot system that has been in operation at the Warren Facility for over a year (Sun et al., 2024). ROC was produced at the PWSC Grace F. Napolitano Innovation Center (NIC) 0.5 mgd reverse osmosis facility. However, ROC was not always available during testing due to facility shutdowns. Therefore, for part of the study, reactor feed was prepared by spiking SE with NaNO3 or by spiking NaNO3 and NaCl to target the desired NH4-N/NOx-N ratio and TDS concentration at similar concentrations to the ROC produced at NIC. Analysis of TIN removal performance data normalized to account for carbon dose did not indicate a statistically significant difference in performance based on TDS concentration.

The pilot system was started up in April 2024 and operated for approximately 5 months. Average conditions over a four-month period of stable operation (May to September 2024) are shown in Table 2. Influent TIN and NH4-N/NOx-N ratio, nitrogen loading rates, and supplemental carbon dose are shown in Figures 5, 6, and 7, respectively. Average influent TIN, NH4-N/NOx-N ratio, and supplemental carbon dose were 74 ± 4 mg N/L, 0.45 ± 0.10 g/g, and 1.9 ± 0.45 g COD added/g TIN influent, respectively. Average influent TIN, NOx, and NH4 loading were 0.55 ± 0.05, 0.38 ± 0.05, and 0.17 ± 0.03 g N/m2-day, respectively.

Performance results are summarized in Table 3. Average TIN, TIN removed via PdNA, NOx, and NH4 removals were 57 ± 16%, 63 ± 14%, 57 ± 15%, and 61 ± 29%, respectively. Corresponding average surface area removal rates were 0.31 ± 0.09 (TIN), 0.22 ± 0.06 (NOx), and 0.10 ± 0.04 (NH4) g N/m2-day. Supplemental carbon dose varied between 0.9 — 2.7 g COD added/g TIN influent and had a significant impact on performance (Figures 8 — 10). As carbon dosing increased or decreased over this range, a corresponding increase or decrease in TIN, NOx, and NH4 removal was observed. TIN, NOx, and NH4 removals ranged between 28 to 84%, 27 to 90%, and 17 to 99%, respectively.

PdN efficiency averaged 55 ± 15% and supplemental carbon demand averaged 3.5 ±0.59 g COD added/g TIN removed. Both parameters generally improved from start-up to the end of the study (Figure 11) and over the last month of stable operation averaged 65 ± 9% and 3.1 ± 0.45 g COD added/g TIN removed. The average PdN efficiency observed in this study is within the range reported in the literature for single-stage PdNA MBBR reactors with glycerol addition: 43 ± 29% g COD/g N (Macmanus et al., 2022) and 88 ± 13% g COD/g N (Klaus et al., 2023). However, the average carbon demand observed was ~ 1 g COD/g N higher, but notably lower than the 5 — 6 g COD/g N removed for glycerol driven FdN observed by Liu et al., 2025.

Planning level cost estimates (AACE Class 5) for full-scale implementation were developed to benchmark against previously evaluated concepts (LACSD 2024). Preliminary estimates suggest that ROC PdNA may be a financially viable approach. The presentation will provide a detailed overview of the pilot system.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
10:30:00
10:45:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionInnovations in Membrane Treatment for Reuse
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicAdvanced Water Treatment and Reuse
TopicAdvanced Water Treatment and Reuse
Author(s)
Mansell, Bruce, Coracero, Ariana, Deco, Rachel, Hsia, Patricia, Le, Tri, Fitzgerald, Colin, Constantine, Timothy, Sun, Yewei, Khunjar, Wendell, Danker, Bryce, Pitt, Paul
Author(s)B. Mansell1, A. Coracero1, R. Deco1, P. Hsia1, T. Le3, C. Fitzgerald3, T. Constantine3, Y. Sun4, W. Khunjar4, B. Danker4, P. Pitt4
Author affiliation(s)LA County Sanitation District1, City of San Mateo2, Jacobs3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825159935
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count8

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Mansell, Bruce. Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 3 Nov. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118669CITANCHOR>.
Mansell, Bruce. Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed November 3, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118669CITANCHOR.
Mansell, Bruce
Partial Denitrification-Anammox Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 1, 2025
November 3, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118669CITANCHOR