Access Water | Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
lastID = -10118768
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:24:13 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 07:03:53 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 15:57:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:50:31 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:07:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:14:49 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling

Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling

Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Abstract
Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) technology is essential for water reuse, which is especially important given increasing water scarcity. While MBRs provide affordable, high-quality treated water, fouling remains a major hurdle for stable operation. To mitigate fouling progression, operators utilize a rigorous set of actions; air scouring, back-pulsing (BP) and chemical cleanings. Notably, air scouring accounts for the largest proportion of operational costs, as its set-point often includes a large safety margin due to uncertainty regarding the required air scour flowrate. In previous study, we proposed and validated using data from two full-scale MBR plants a model (the K model) to estimate the necessary air scouring intensity under specific operational conditions. The model incorporates key variables, including permeate flux, mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, and membrane resistance, and enables the identification of thresholds where hydrodynamic conditions change abruptly, leading to the on-set of critical flux. The results demonstrated that system response can be effectively characterized using the proposed model, allowing optimization of the air scour flowrate (Jun et al., 2024). The model is consistent with the results of others indicating that higher resistance leads to increased local permeate flux, which in turn requires greater shear intensity.

Here we will present long-term operating data for an additional full-scale MBR plant that builds on the work of others to characterize fouling and its interaction with air scour control. Diez et al. (2013) suggested that resistance measured during back-pulsing (BP) cycles (hereafter referred to as intact resistance) characterizes irreversible membrane fouling. We use this to characterize pore blocking and external residuals not effectively removed during repeated permeation cycles, as suggested by Li and Wang (2006). Therefore, the intact resistance value in this study is determined by RT(Total resistance) — RBP(BP resistance) — Rm (Membrane resistance).

Increasing intact resistance results in increased local flux and accounts for the need to adjust air scouring appropriately. We introduce a pragmatic two-dimensional operational matrix, based on the K value, which represents the hydrodynamic balance between solids deposition during filtration and removal by air scouring, and intact resistance, which indicates the sensitivity of this balance. Under elevated intact resistance conditions, cake resistance tends to increase in response to external stimuli, such as high flux or high solid loading, even within the favorable hydrodynamic conditions.

The right side of Figure 1 presents the control matrix, including air scouring flowrate (characterized by K, x-axis), intact resistance (y-axis, while the left side presents supporting data from the full-scale MBR.) Plant data (left side of Figure 1) reveals resistance slope changes defined by two fine-tuned thresholds: KLim (limiting condition) and KS.F (incorporating safety factor). The numbers within each grid define sections (bottom left panel): section 9 indicates the optimal zone, sections 6 and 8 are attention zones, and the remaining sections are classified as limiting zones. The goal is to maintain operations within the optimal zone (i.e., minimizing cake development by controlling intact resistance), with two set-points ensuring stability during deviations. Cake resistance is modest above KS.F but begins to increase below it and more rapidly near KLim. Intact resistance has two thresholds: the Target Limit and the Warning Limit. Above the Target Limit, the rate of cake resistance increase become more sensitive to operational condition yet manageable but becomes increasingly difficult above the Warning Limit. Table 1 outlines the appropriate actions to reduce unnecessary excess of resources that has marginal benefits.

Detail case study and examples of use of these control measures based on data from the full-scale MBR will be presented. This approach facilitates optimal decision-making, including air scouring adjustments to reduce energy consumption, and measures to prolong operation before a recovery clean is necessary.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
14:30:00
14:45:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionApplications and Optimization of MBR Technology
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
Author(s)
Jun, Changyoon, AGHASADEGHI, KIMIA, Daigger, Glen
Author(s)C. Jun1, K. AGHASADEGHI2, G. Daigger1
Author affiliation(s)University of Michigan1, Fibracast Ltd.2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160034
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count10

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118768
Get access
-10118768
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Abstract
Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) technology is essential for water reuse, which is especially important given increasing water scarcity. While MBRs provide affordable, high-quality treated water, fouling remains a major hurdle for stable operation. To mitigate fouling progression, operators utilize a rigorous set of actions; air scouring, back-pulsing (BP) and chemical cleanings. Notably, air scouring accounts for the largest proportion of operational costs, as its set-point often includes a large safety margin due to uncertainty regarding the required air scour flowrate. In previous study, we proposed and validated using data from two full-scale MBR plants a model (the K model) to estimate the necessary air scouring intensity under specific operational conditions. The model incorporates key variables, including permeate flux, mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, and membrane resistance, and enables the identification of thresholds where hydrodynamic conditions change abruptly, leading to the on-set of critical flux. The results demonstrated that system response can be effectively characterized using the proposed model, allowing optimization of the air scour flowrate (Jun et al., 2024). The model is consistent with the results of others indicating that higher resistance leads to increased local permeate flux, which in turn requires greater shear intensity.

Here we will present long-term operating data for an additional full-scale MBR plant that builds on the work of others to characterize fouling and its interaction with air scour control. Diez et al. (2013) suggested that resistance measured during back-pulsing (BP) cycles (hereafter referred to as intact resistance) characterizes irreversible membrane fouling. We use this to characterize pore blocking and external residuals not effectively removed during repeated permeation cycles, as suggested by Li and Wang (2006). Therefore, the intact resistance value in this study is determined by RT(Total resistance) — RBP(BP resistance) — Rm (Membrane resistance).

Increasing intact resistance results in increased local flux and accounts for the need to adjust air scouring appropriately. We introduce a pragmatic two-dimensional operational matrix, based on the K value, which represents the hydrodynamic balance between solids deposition during filtration and removal by air scouring, and intact resistance, which indicates the sensitivity of this balance. Under elevated intact resistance conditions, cake resistance tends to increase in response to external stimuli, such as high flux or high solid loading, even within the favorable hydrodynamic conditions.

The right side of Figure 1 presents the control matrix, including air scouring flowrate (characterized by K, x-axis), intact resistance (y-axis, while the left side presents supporting data from the full-scale MBR.) Plant data (left side of Figure 1) reveals resistance slope changes defined by two fine-tuned thresholds: KLim (limiting condition) and KS.F (incorporating safety factor). The numbers within each grid define sections (bottom left panel): section 9 indicates the optimal zone, sections 6 and 8 are attention zones, and the remaining sections are classified as limiting zones. The goal is to maintain operations within the optimal zone (i.e., minimizing cake development by controlling intact resistance), with two set-points ensuring stability during deviations. Cake resistance is modest above KS.F but begins to increase below it and more rapidly near KLim. Intact resistance has two thresholds: the Target Limit and the Warning Limit. Above the Target Limit, the rate of cake resistance increase become more sensitive to operational condition yet manageable but becomes increasingly difficult above the Warning Limit. Table 1 outlines the appropriate actions to reduce unnecessary excess of resources that has marginal benefits.

Detail case study and examples of use of these control measures based on data from the full-scale MBR will be presented. This approach facilitates optimal decision-making, including air scouring adjustments to reduce energy consumption, and measures to prolong operation before a recovery clean is necessary.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
14:30:00
14:45:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionApplications and Optimization of MBR Technology
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
Author(s)
Jun, Changyoon, AGHASADEGHI, KIMIA, Daigger, Glen
Author(s)C. Jun1, K. AGHASADEGHI2, G. Daigger1
Author affiliation(s)University of Michigan1, Fibracast Ltd.2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160034
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count10

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Jun, Changyoon. Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 15 Dec. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118768CITANCHOR>.
Jun, Changyoon. Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed December 15, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118768CITANCHOR.
Jun, Changyoon
Membrane Bioreactor Air Scour Control Model to Address Fouling
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 29, 2025
December 15, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118768CITANCHOR