Access Water | Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
lastID = -10118805
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:27:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 07:08:51 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 15:59:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:56:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:08:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:15:32 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR

Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR

Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Physa genus snails were observed during nitrification-only tertiary membrane bioreactor (N-only tMBR) operation in support of Pure Water Southern California, a joint program between the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) to provide potable reuse water to Southern California. Development and testing of bench-scale protocol and pilot-scale testing evaluated several mitigation strategies including influent ultra-fine screening, free ammonia exposure, acute anoxia, chlorination, sodium chloride and iron. Results indicated that ultra-fine screening and free ammonia exposure were the most effective strategies to implement. These strategies will be tested at demonstration-scale at a 0.6 mgd facility to validate snail suppression effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION
Pure Water Southern California is a joint program being pursued by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) to provide a new source of water for Southern California. Effluent from LACSD's largest facility, the A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (Warren) will be treated for nutrient removal and advanced water treatment to meet potable reuse standards prior to distribution in the region (Figure 1). In advance of implementation, the Grace F. Napolitano Innovation Center's Demonstration Plant (Demonstration Plant) was built to evaluate nitrogen removal alternatives. While operating in nitrification-only tertiary membrane bioreactor (N-Only tMBR) mode, snails identified as Physa genus were observed in the membrane tanks, likely sourced from Warren secondary effluent (SE) (Figure 2). While initially addressed with more frequent membrane cleaning, snail proliferation could cause significant increases to both capital and operational costs at full-scale. Planning began in 2023 to provide viable snail mitigation options for future retesting at demonstration-scale and planning for full-scale operation. Potential mitigation measures based on literature review and previous experience were compiled and ranked with the most promising selected for evaluation (Table 1).

OBJECTIVES
The objective was to evaluate the most viable snail prevention, mitigation, and recovery measures identified from literature review and determine the most effective approaches for implementation at the Demonstration Plant and consideration for full-scale implementation.

METHODOLOGY
A bench-scale protocol using snails harvested and grown at the Warren Facility was developed that included the verification of snails of the genus Physa. The snails were placed in an acclimation tank filled with nitrified Warren SE, aerated, and fed with activated sludge from nitrification-denitrification water reclamation plants (Figure 3). The snails were acclimated and tested after reaching maturity. Ten snails were tested per batch in aerated Warren SE (unaerated for anoxic testing) in each test beaker. Ten snails were added to a second beaker to serve as the control. After each test, snails were placed in aerated SE for recovery and observed at 24 and 48 hours. The 48-hour mortality was reported. A separate protocol was developed for iron due to suppression from bioaccumulation. Mitigation measures tested at bench-scale are shown in Table 2.

Pilot-scale evaluation consisted of operating an existing pilot-scale tMBR (Figure 4) in N-only mode from April to September 2023 to determine if snails would proliferate under these conditions (Table 3). Monthly MBR snail observations were performed. An additional pilot was constructed to evaluate ultra-fine screening. A 75-micron and a 150-micron screen were evaluated alongside a 9.5 mm screen as control (Figure 5). Snails were seeded inside each mesh screen, and the holding tank was monitored to measure screen-size effectiveness. Further pilot modification was performed to optimize successful bench-scale strategies and mitigation strategies that were inconclusive at bench-scale due to the acute testing protocol.

<B>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Bench-scale testing results (Table 4) indicated that the 4000 mg/L NH4Cl at pH 9 showed the highest mortality with an average 48-hour mortality > 97.5%. Anoxic conditions, short-term chlorination, sodium chloride and iron exposure showed minimal to no mortality when compared to control. However, anoxic conditions will be further evaluated at the demonstration scale due to observed suppression in previous nitrification-denitrification modes at the Demonstration Plant. Anoxic conditions and chlorination may be more effective on suppression of younger life stages during continuous operation. Therefore, chlorination will also be re-evaluated at pilot-scale in flow-through mode and at demonstration scale.

Operation of N-only tMBR was successfully replicated at pilot-scale (Figure 6). However, monthly MBR observations did not show snail proliferation (Figure 7), possibly due to weekly hypochlorite and citric acid cleaning and will be further evaluated individually. Results showed that 75-micron screening was effective at snail suppression, but 150-micron screens might allow eggs to pass through the screen after one month (Figure 8). Additional work of ultra-fine screening is planned at pilot-scale and will also be incorporated in future testing at the Demonstration plant.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
13:30:00
13:45:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionTertiary Filtration: Case Studies for Design Optimization
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
Author(s)
Lynch, Bellanira, Deco, Rachel, Adams, Scott, Reinke, Ryan, Mansell, Bruce, Thompson, Shawn, Robinette, Matthew, Danker, Bryce, Fitzgerald, Colin, Di Giovanni, George
Author(s)B. Lynch1, R. Deco1, S. Adams1, R. Reinke1, B. Mansell1, S. Thompson1, M. Robinette1, B. Danker2, C. Fitzgerald3, G. Di Giovanni4
Author affiliation(s)LA County Sanitation District1, Hazen and Sawyer2, Jacobs3, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160071
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count9

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118805
Get access
-10118805
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Physa genus snails were observed during nitrification-only tertiary membrane bioreactor (N-only tMBR) operation in support of Pure Water Southern California, a joint program between the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) to provide potable reuse water to Southern California. Development and testing of bench-scale protocol and pilot-scale testing evaluated several mitigation strategies including influent ultra-fine screening, free ammonia exposure, acute anoxia, chlorination, sodium chloride and iron. Results indicated that ultra-fine screening and free ammonia exposure were the most effective strategies to implement. These strategies will be tested at demonstration-scale at a 0.6 mgd facility to validate snail suppression effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION
Pure Water Southern California is a joint program being pursued by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) to provide a new source of water for Southern California. Effluent from LACSD's largest facility, the A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (Warren) will be treated for nutrient removal and advanced water treatment to meet potable reuse standards prior to distribution in the region (Figure 1). In advance of implementation, the Grace F. Napolitano Innovation Center's Demonstration Plant (Demonstration Plant) was built to evaluate nitrogen removal alternatives. While operating in nitrification-only tertiary membrane bioreactor (N-Only tMBR) mode, snails identified as Physa genus were observed in the membrane tanks, likely sourced from Warren secondary effluent (SE) (Figure 2). While initially addressed with more frequent membrane cleaning, snail proliferation could cause significant increases to both capital and operational costs at full-scale. Planning began in 2023 to provide viable snail mitigation options for future retesting at demonstration-scale and planning for full-scale operation. Potential mitigation measures based on literature review and previous experience were compiled and ranked with the most promising selected for evaluation (Table 1).

OBJECTIVES
The objective was to evaluate the most viable snail prevention, mitigation, and recovery measures identified from literature review and determine the most effective approaches for implementation at the Demonstration Plant and consideration for full-scale implementation.

METHODOLOGY
A bench-scale protocol using snails harvested and grown at the Warren Facility was developed that included the verification of snails of the genus Physa. The snails were placed in an acclimation tank filled with nitrified Warren SE, aerated, and fed with activated sludge from nitrification-denitrification water reclamation plants (Figure 3). The snails were acclimated and tested after reaching maturity. Ten snails were tested per batch in aerated Warren SE (unaerated for anoxic testing) in each test beaker. Ten snails were added to a second beaker to serve as the control. After each test, snails were placed in aerated SE for recovery and observed at 24 and 48 hours. The 48-hour mortality was reported. A separate protocol was developed for iron due to suppression from bioaccumulation. Mitigation measures tested at bench-scale are shown in Table 2.

Pilot-scale evaluation consisted of operating an existing pilot-scale tMBR (Figure 4) in N-only mode from April to September 2023 to determine if snails would proliferate under these conditions (Table 3). Monthly MBR snail observations were performed. An additional pilot was constructed to evaluate ultra-fine screening. A 75-micron and a 150-micron screen were evaluated alongside a 9.5 mm screen as control (Figure 5). Snails were seeded inside each mesh screen, and the holding tank was monitored to measure screen-size effectiveness. Further pilot modification was performed to optimize successful bench-scale strategies and mitigation strategies that were inconclusive at bench-scale due to the acute testing protocol.

<B>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Bench-scale testing results (Table 4) indicated that the 4000 mg/L NH4Cl at pH 9 showed the highest mortality with an average 48-hour mortality > 97.5%. Anoxic conditions, short-term chlorination, sodium chloride and iron exposure showed minimal to no mortality when compared to control. However, anoxic conditions will be further evaluated at the demonstration scale due to observed suppression in previous nitrification-denitrification modes at the Demonstration Plant. Anoxic conditions and chlorination may be more effective on suppression of younger life stages during continuous operation. Therefore, chlorination will also be re-evaluated at pilot-scale in flow-through mode and at demonstration scale.

Operation of N-only tMBR was successfully replicated at pilot-scale (Figure 6). However, monthly MBR observations did not show snail proliferation (Figure 7), possibly due to weekly hypochlorite and citric acid cleaning and will be further evaluated individually. Results showed that 75-micron screening was effective at snail suppression, but 150-micron screens might allow eggs to pass through the screen after one month (Figure 8). Additional work of ultra-fine screening is planned at pilot-scale and will also be incorporated in future testing at the Demonstration plant.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
13:30:00
13:45:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionTertiary Filtration: Case Studies for Design Optimization
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Secondary & Tertiary Treatment
Author(s)
Lynch, Bellanira, Deco, Rachel, Adams, Scott, Reinke, Ryan, Mansell, Bruce, Thompson, Shawn, Robinette, Matthew, Danker, Bryce, Fitzgerald, Colin, Di Giovanni, George
Author(s)B. Lynch1, R. Deco1, S. Adams1, R. Reinke1, B. Mansell1, S. Thompson1, M. Robinette1, B. Danker2, C. Fitzgerald3, G. Di Giovanni4
Author affiliation(s)LA County Sanitation District1, Hazen and Sawyer2, Jacobs3, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160071
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count9

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Lynch, Bellanira. Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 3 Nov. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118805CITANCHOR>.
Lynch, Bellanira. Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed November 3, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118805CITANCHOR.
Lynch, Bellanira
Snail Away: Snail Mitigation of Nitrification-Only Tertiary MBR
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 1, 2025
November 3, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118805CITANCHOR