Access Water | Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment...
lastID = -10118875
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:26:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 07:07:33 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 16:01:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:54:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:10:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:16:59 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success

Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success

Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station (GWWTS) is one of 14 Consent Decree projects in King County's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Long Term Control Plan to reduce CSOs into local water bodies and protect public health and the environment. The GWWTS improves the resiliency of the regional King County wastewater system by capturing and treating the CSOs at two CSO outfalls into the Lower Duwamish Waterway. The remote high-rate treatment facility has a capacity of 265 MLD (70 mgd) and began operations in December 2022.

Operating a remote high-rate treatment facility and meeting permit limits is challenging due to the complexity of the treatment process, its intermittent use, and the dynamic nature of wet weather events. The facility's discharge permit is unique as it includes monitoring and reporting requirements for compounds in its treated effluent that aren't typically regulated at remote facilities. Through two years of operation, King County staff and the engineer found several facility design features to be especially useful, identified and implemented measures to improve operations, and determined improvements for the design of future facilities.

OVERVIEW
The location of the GWWTS is shown in Figure 1. Land use in the area is primarily industrial and commercial but also includes residential and neighborhood business areas. Figure 2 shows a rendering of the facility and identifies major treatment processes, buildings, and water conservation and aesthetic features. Figure 3 shows the GWWTS process flow diagram. Flow enters the facility through a flow regulator. Two influent screens remove oversized materials protecting downstream pumps and process equipment from clogging. A dual-purpose equalization basin attenuates the peak influent flow to a 265 MLD (70 mgd) treatment station flow while also doubling as a wet well for the facility's six influent pumps. Two ballasted sedimentation trains are followed by two UV disinfection batteries. An onsite solids storage and thickening tank stores solids onsite during the treatment event. A distinctive feature of the GWWTS is an internal recycle loop that allows for full-scale testing of the facility under dry weather conditions (Figure 4).

TREATMENT PERFORMANCE
Table 1 shows selected monitoring, discharge limits, and reporting requirements in the GWWTS discharge permit. The four parameters with permit limits are typical for remote wet weather treatment facilities. Over 20 other parameters have effluent monitoring requirements that are atypical for wet weather treatment facilities. Figure 5 shows influent flow and effluent flow volumes and the peak influent flow during six wet weather treatment events. All events had some flow that remained in the equalization basin that was returned to the collection system for treatment at King County's downstream West Point Treatment Plant following the storm event. The peak treatment flows were all relatively high even though treatment volumes were typically low, demonstrating the variability of wet weather events.
Figure 6 shows the influent and effluent TSS concentration from 24-hour flow proportional composite samples and percent TSS removal during each event. The figure indicates excellent TSS removal by the ballasted sedimentation process. Figure 7 shows the effluent fecal coliform counts from grab samples taken during each wet weather event.

Table 2 shows selected effluent priority pollutant concentrations for events when sampled. The facility's discharge permit was reissued on 6/1/24 and contains additional monitoring parameters such as ammonia. These parameters were not sampled under the previous permit. They were sampled during the 12/25/24 event, but the results aren't available yet. The results will be included in the paper along with data from any additional events.

BENEFICIAL DESIGN FEATURES, OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND FUTURE FACILITY DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS
Effluent recirculation piping: Operational staff found the effluent recirculation piping to be very helpful as the GWWTS can be operated at full capacity during dry weather to enable testing, training, and troubleshooting without discharging effluent.
Uniform operator interface panels: Graphics were standardized across control packages so operators had similar interfaces throughout the station. This is especially beneficial for infrequently used facilities that are operated under stressful conditions.
Cycling optimization: During wet weather events, the facility cycles between storage and treatment and between discharging and recirculating flow depending on the influent flow to the facility. The process engineer and control engineer can work with operational staff during smaller wet weather events to optimize station controls and process parameters.
Chemical recirculation piping for future facilities: Add piping to recirculate chemicals while calibrating/troubleshooting feed pumps to keep excess chemicals out of the process. High effluent pH observed initially during a treatment event was attributed to caustic lingering in the process after operation and maintenance activity.
Rock and grit removal for future facilities: The extent of grit accumulation was greater than anticipated and large volumes of grit settled out in the GWWTS influent pipe and screening channel during two wet weather events. This has led to operational suggestions to include rock and grit removal in future facilities.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:30:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionResiliency and Effectiveness of Wet Weather Flow Management and Treatment
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Preliminary, Primary, and Wet Weather Treatment
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Preliminary, Primary, and Wet Weather Treatment
Author(s)
Dunne, Ryan, Hastings, Tina, Siczka, John, Carter, John
Author(s)R. Dunne1, T. Hastings2, J. Siczka1, J. Carter3
Author affiliation(s)Jacobs Engineering Group1, CH2M2, King County Dept Of Nat'l Res & Parks3, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160141
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count11

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118875
Get access
-10118875
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The Georgetown Wet Weather Treatment Station (GWWTS) is one of 14 Consent Decree projects in King County's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Long Term Control Plan to reduce CSOs into local water bodies and protect public health and the environment. The GWWTS improves the resiliency of the regional King County wastewater system by capturing and treating the CSOs at two CSO outfalls into the Lower Duwamish Waterway. The remote high-rate treatment facility has a capacity of 265 MLD (70 mgd) and began operations in December 2022.

Operating a remote high-rate treatment facility and meeting permit limits is challenging due to the complexity of the treatment process, its intermittent use, and the dynamic nature of wet weather events. The facility's discharge permit is unique as it includes monitoring and reporting requirements for compounds in its treated effluent that aren't typically regulated at remote facilities. Through two years of operation, King County staff and the engineer found several facility design features to be especially useful, identified and implemented measures to improve operations, and determined improvements for the design of future facilities.

OVERVIEW
The location of the GWWTS is shown in Figure 1. Land use in the area is primarily industrial and commercial but also includes residential and neighborhood business areas. Figure 2 shows a rendering of the facility and identifies major treatment processes, buildings, and water conservation and aesthetic features. Figure 3 shows the GWWTS process flow diagram. Flow enters the facility through a flow regulator. Two influent screens remove oversized materials protecting downstream pumps and process equipment from clogging. A dual-purpose equalization basin attenuates the peak influent flow to a 265 MLD (70 mgd) treatment station flow while also doubling as a wet well for the facility's six influent pumps. Two ballasted sedimentation trains are followed by two UV disinfection batteries. An onsite solids storage and thickening tank stores solids onsite during the treatment event. A distinctive feature of the GWWTS is an internal recycle loop that allows for full-scale testing of the facility under dry weather conditions (Figure 4).

TREATMENT PERFORMANCE
Table 1 shows selected monitoring, discharge limits, and reporting requirements in the GWWTS discharge permit. The four parameters with permit limits are typical for remote wet weather treatment facilities. Over 20 other parameters have effluent monitoring requirements that are atypical for wet weather treatment facilities. Figure 5 shows influent flow and effluent flow volumes and the peak influent flow during six wet weather treatment events. All events had some flow that remained in the equalization basin that was returned to the collection system for treatment at King County's downstream West Point Treatment Plant following the storm event. The peak treatment flows were all relatively high even though treatment volumes were typically low, demonstrating the variability of wet weather events.
Figure 6 shows the influent and effluent TSS concentration from 24-hour flow proportional composite samples and percent TSS removal during each event. The figure indicates excellent TSS removal by the ballasted sedimentation process. Figure 7 shows the effluent fecal coliform counts from grab samples taken during each wet weather event.

Table 2 shows selected effluent priority pollutant concentrations for events when sampled. The facility's discharge permit was reissued on 6/1/24 and contains additional monitoring parameters such as ammonia. These parameters were not sampled under the previous permit. They were sampled during the 12/25/24 event, but the results aren't available yet. The results will be included in the paper along with data from any additional events.

BENEFICIAL DESIGN FEATURES, OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND FUTURE FACILITY DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS
Effluent recirculation piping: Operational staff found the effluent recirculation piping to be very helpful as the GWWTS can be operated at full capacity during dry weather to enable testing, training, and troubleshooting without discharging effluent.
Uniform operator interface panels: Graphics were standardized across control packages so operators had similar interfaces throughout the station. This is especially beneficial for infrequently used facilities that are operated under stressful conditions.
Cycling optimization: During wet weather events, the facility cycles between storage and treatment and between discharging and recirculating flow depending on the influent flow to the facility. The process engineer and control engineer can work with operational staff during smaller wet weather events to optimize station controls and process parameters.
Chemical recirculation piping for future facilities: Add piping to recirculate chemicals while calibrating/troubleshooting feed pumps to keep excess chemicals out of the process. High effluent pH observed initially during a treatment event was attributed to caustic lingering in the process after operation and maintenance activity.
Rock and grit removal for future facilities: The extent of grit accumulation was greater than anticipated and large volumes of grit settled out in the GWWTS influent pipe and screening channel during two wet weather events. This has led to operational suggestions to include rock and grit removal in future facilities.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:30:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionResiliency and Effectiveness of Wet Weather Flow Management and Treatment
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Preliminary, Primary, and Wet Weather Treatment
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment Technology - Preliminary, Primary, and Wet Weather Treatment
Author(s)
Dunne, Ryan, Hastings, Tina, Siczka, John, Carter, John
Author(s)R. Dunne1, T. Hastings2, J. Siczka1, J. Carter3
Author affiliation(s)Jacobs Engineering Group1, CH2M2, King County Dept Of Nat'l Res & Parks3, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160141
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count11

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Dunne, Ryan. Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 2 Nov. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118875CITANCHOR>.
Dunne, Ryan. Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed November 2, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118875CITANCHOR.
Dunne, Ryan
Remote Wet Weather Treatment Facility Operational Insights and Treatment Success
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2025
November 2, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118875CITANCHOR