Access Water | Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion...
lastID = -10118885
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion...
Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:20:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 06:54:16 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 16:01:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:40:14 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:10:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:17:10 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion...
Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis

Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis

Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion...
Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis
Abstract
Thermal hydrolysis represents the state-of-the-art intensification for anaerobic sludge stabilization currently, providing high loading capacity, pathogen kill to Class A standard, reduced sludge viscosity and improved sludge dewaterability. Emerging intensification processes need to provide a similar or better range of benefits to drawbacks or provide similar levels at a lower lifecycle cost to enter the market effectively. The first step in this process is to understand the relative process performance of the two systems, treating sludges from the same facility.

A bench-scale pilot study was conducted at Western University to explore how the IntensiCarb™ process compares to thermal hydrolysis operated at their typical loading rates (Figure 1). For the IntensiCarb™ process this involved operating at a 20-day SRT and 5-day HRT and for thermal hydrolysis this represents operating at an SRT of 20 days, a maximum organic loading rate of <0.400 lb-VS/ft3-d and total ammonium-N concentration of < 3,000 mg-N/L. Thermal hydrolysis was conducted at 150°C for 30 minutes, prior to feeding to the digesters. The feed sludge to digestion was a mix of primary and secondary sludge from the Greenway Wastewater Treatment Plant, as characterized in Table 1.

Under the operating conditions outlined, above a variety of process metrics were evaluated to determine process performance and any relative differences between the two processes. Figure 2 compares the methane yield of the digesters (L-CH4/gCODfed) between the IC reactor and the THP system. What is apparent in the data is that during early operation the yield was comparable, but after approximately 1.75 SRTs there was a marked drop off in the methane production from the THP system, decreasing to 0.07 L-CH4/g-CODfed as compared to the IC system at 0.22 L-CH4/g-CODfed. As subsequently discussed, the drop in production was likely due to ammonia-N toxicity.

Figure 3, shows total ammonia-N concentration in the digesters. The IC digester operated between 800-1200 mg-N/L over the course of the evaluation period. The THP digester total ammonia-N increased to an average of 3,200 mg-N/L, above typical process limits. The THP digester was allowed to run for an additional 2 SRTs beyond the first indication of process deterioration. This was done to understand if the biomass, given sufficient time would acclimate to the ammonia. However, no improvement was realized. Specific methanogenic activity tests were conducted during this time to confirm that it was ammonia toxicity impacting the methanogenic population. SMA testing demonstrated consistent methane production from the IC digesters, while the THP sludge produced no gas, indicating acetoclastic methanogenesis was completely inhibited by ammonia. While the loading rate of the IC digester was high, it was protected by the removal of ammonia during the evaporation process. Figure 4 shows the partitioning of total ammonia-N between the digester and that removed in the condensate. Approximately 57% of the organic nitrogen converted to ammonium was removed in the condensate, keeping the concentration in the digester at tolerable levels.

Volatile acid data supported the observation that methanogenic activity was primarily inhibited by the elevated ammonia-N levels in the THP digester, as total VFA rose to concentrations greater the 8,000 mg/L as acetate (Figure 5). The data also appears to support prior observations regarding IC operations, that overtime there is a shift in the microbial community, as biogas production stabilized but VFA levels continued to decrease after 2.5 SRTs. Had the system fully stabilized, system performance should have been similar to prior SRTs of operation. The data to date indicate that for these high load systems, acclimation is critical to long-term performance. After several attempts at trying to recover the THP digestion system from ammonia toxicity it was decided the best course of action would be to reseed the digester with sludge from an operating thermal hydrolysis unit. Sludge was shipped overnight from the DCWater Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant in Washington, DC which has been operating a CAMBI thermal hydrolysis process since 2014. By inoculating the THP digestion system with biomass acclimated to high load and high ammonia levels, a more representative comparative analysis could be conducted.

After approximately 20 days of operation the inoculated THP digester has shown strong performance and not exhibited the high VFA and low methane production its predecessor had, while being fed the same sludge from the Greenway facility. The results suggest that acclimation of biomass is increasingly critical for some digestion processes as loading rates increase beyond conventional norms.

This paper will present the complete data from both IC and THP trials, including the reseed reactor performance and ammonia stress trials investigating process robustness (data not shown). The final paper will present a direct comparison of process performance and an evaluation of the different impacts the two intensification strategies have on anaerobic digestion. This paper will provides a direct comparison of the current state-of-the-art digestion operations with a new and emerging technology demonstrating how different intensification strategies can address specific user needs and critical success factors.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
16:30:00
17:00:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionChallenges and Innovation in Sludge Processing
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicResearch
TopicResearch
Author(s)
Muller, Christopher, Khadir, Ali, Al-Omari, Ahmed, Santoro, Domenico, Sheculski, Chris, Bell, Katherine, Parker, Wayne, Nakhla, George
Author(s)C. Muller1, A. Khadir2, A. Al-Omari1, D. Santoro3, C. Sheculski3, K. Bell1, W. Parker4, G. Nakhla2
Author affiliation(s)Brown and Caldwell1, Western Univerisity2, Trojan Technologies3, Univerisity of Waterloo4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160151
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count14

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion...
Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118885
Get access
-10118885
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion...
Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis
Abstract
Thermal hydrolysis represents the state-of-the-art intensification for anaerobic sludge stabilization currently, providing high loading capacity, pathogen kill to Class A standard, reduced sludge viscosity and improved sludge dewaterability. Emerging intensification processes need to provide a similar or better range of benefits to drawbacks or provide similar levels at a lower lifecycle cost to enter the market effectively. The first step in this process is to understand the relative process performance of the two systems, treating sludges from the same facility.

A bench-scale pilot study was conducted at Western University to explore how the IntensiCarb™ process compares to thermal hydrolysis operated at their typical loading rates (Figure 1). For the IntensiCarb™ process this involved operating at a 20-day SRT and 5-day HRT and for thermal hydrolysis this represents operating at an SRT of 20 days, a maximum organic loading rate of <0.400 lb-VS/ft3-d and total ammonium-N concentration of < 3,000 mg-N/L. Thermal hydrolysis was conducted at 150°C for 30 minutes, prior to feeding to the digesters. The feed sludge to digestion was a mix of primary and secondary sludge from the Greenway Wastewater Treatment Plant, as characterized in Table 1.

Under the operating conditions outlined, above a variety of process metrics were evaluated to determine process performance and any relative differences between the two processes. Figure 2 compares the methane yield of the digesters (L-CH4/gCODfed) between the IC reactor and the THP system. What is apparent in the data is that during early operation the yield was comparable, but after approximately 1.75 SRTs there was a marked drop off in the methane production from the THP system, decreasing to 0.07 L-CH4/g-CODfed as compared to the IC system at 0.22 L-CH4/g-CODfed. As subsequently discussed, the drop in production was likely due to ammonia-N toxicity.

Figure 3, shows total ammonia-N concentration in the digesters. The IC digester operated between 800-1200 mg-N/L over the course of the evaluation period. The THP digester total ammonia-N increased to an average of 3,200 mg-N/L, above typical process limits. The THP digester was allowed to run for an additional 2 SRTs beyond the first indication of process deterioration. This was done to understand if the biomass, given sufficient time would acclimate to the ammonia. However, no improvement was realized. Specific methanogenic activity tests were conducted during this time to confirm that it was ammonia toxicity impacting the methanogenic population. SMA testing demonstrated consistent methane production from the IC digesters, while the THP sludge produced no gas, indicating acetoclastic methanogenesis was completely inhibited by ammonia. While the loading rate of the IC digester was high, it was protected by the removal of ammonia during the evaporation process. Figure 4 shows the partitioning of total ammonia-N between the digester and that removed in the condensate. Approximately 57% of the organic nitrogen converted to ammonium was removed in the condensate, keeping the concentration in the digester at tolerable levels.

Volatile acid data supported the observation that methanogenic activity was primarily inhibited by the elevated ammonia-N levels in the THP digester, as total VFA rose to concentrations greater the 8,000 mg/L as acetate (Figure 5). The data also appears to support prior observations regarding IC operations, that overtime there is a shift in the microbial community, as biogas production stabilized but VFA levels continued to decrease after 2.5 SRTs. Had the system fully stabilized, system performance should have been similar to prior SRTs of operation. The data to date indicate that for these high load systems, acclimation is critical to long-term performance. After several attempts at trying to recover the THP digestion system from ammonia toxicity it was decided the best course of action would be to reseed the digester with sludge from an operating thermal hydrolysis unit. Sludge was shipped overnight from the DCWater Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant in Washington, DC which has been operating a CAMBI thermal hydrolysis process since 2014. By inoculating the THP digestion system with biomass acclimated to high load and high ammonia levels, a more representative comparative analysis could be conducted.

After approximately 20 days of operation the inoculated THP digester has shown strong performance and not exhibited the high VFA and low methane production its predecessor had, while being fed the same sludge from the Greenway facility. The results suggest that acclimation of biomass is increasingly critical for some digestion processes as loading rates increase beyond conventional norms.

This paper will present the complete data from both IC and THP trials, including the reseed reactor performance and ammonia stress trials investigating process robustness (data not shown). The final paper will present a direct comparison of process performance and an evaluation of the different impacts the two intensification strategies have on anaerobic digestion. This paper will provides a direct comparison of the current state-of-the-art digestion operations with a new and emerging technology demonstrating how different intensification strategies can address specific user needs and critical success factors.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
16:30:00
17:00:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionChallenges and Innovation in Sludge Processing
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicResearch
TopicResearch
Author(s)
Muller, Christopher, Khadir, Ali, Al-Omari, Ahmed, Santoro, Domenico, Sheculski, Chris, Bell, Katherine, Parker, Wayne, Nakhla, George
Author(s)C. Muller1, A. Khadir2, A. Al-Omari1, D. Santoro3, C. Sheculski3, K. Bell1, W. Parker4, G. Nakhla2
Author affiliation(s)Brown and Caldwell1, Western Univerisity2, Trojan Technologies3, Univerisity of Waterloo4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160151
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count14

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Muller, Christopher. Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 6 Nov. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118885CITANCHOR>.
Muller, Christopher. Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed November 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118885CITANCHOR.
Muller, Christopher
Bench Scale Comparison of Vacuum Evaporation Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion (IntensiCarbTM) with Thermal Hydrolysis
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2025
November 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118885CITANCHOR