Access Water | Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from...
lastID = -10127202
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: RBITT_2026_Proceeding
Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2026-05-09 06:10:46 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2026-05-08 11:12:32 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: RBITT_2026_Proceeding
Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release

Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release

Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: RBITT_2026_Proceeding
Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release
Abstract
Introduction Many wastewater treatment plants rely on chemical phosphorus removal (CPR) to meet discharge limits. CPR commonly relies on iron (Fe) addition to remove phosphorus (P), and though it provides reliability, the chemical can be costly. Plants with high enough volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations are often able to use biological P removal (BPR), allowing for savings on chemical costs. Additional carbon can be supplied from primary sludge (PS) fermentation to drive BPR. There is also an opportunity to use PS fermentate to support nitrogen (N) removal in plants with low discharge limits, which are generally dependent on external carbon addition, to offset chemical costs. Despite the potential cost reduction, there are challenges with implementing PS fermentate as a carbon source. During fermentation, nutrients are released in addition to VFAs and COD. N concentrations are low compared to COD, and can be managed through PdNA or reoxidation after denitrification. P is released through hydrolysis similar to N, but in CPR plants there is an additional release of Fe-bound P due to Fe reduction under anaerobic conditions. This can be a significant issue for plants with low P limits, such as the Blue Plains AWWTP which has a 0.18 mg/L discharge limit. The objective of this study was to evaluate conditions for decoupling COD and P release by managing Fe reduction of Fe-P precipitation within the fermenter. Recent studies show that vivianite, an Fe-P mineral, may precipitate at a pH greater than 6. Therefore, it was hypothesized that pH adjustment may be a viable strategy to support optimizing CPR. In addition to elutriation, lime dosing was explored as a method for raising the pH due to its availability at Blue Plains. Materials and Methods Two 60-L fermentation pilot reactors were fed with Blue Plains PS at 5 g/L and controlled to a SRT target of 1-d. The system was operated under several test scenarios including a control: mechanical treatment, low and high microaeration, and low and high lime slurry addition (100 and 200 mg/L CaCO3). Fe overdosing in full-scale treatment also occurred during testing but was not controlled as a test scenario. Measurements were performed on influent and decant fermentate to calculate concentrations and yields. A full-scale gravity thickener (GT) at Blue Plains was converted to fermenter conditions by allowing an SRT between 0.2-2 days and was operated under full-scale conditions for sludge composition and solids loading. Influent and effluent sludges were analyzed, and data was categorized by TSS: low (<3.5 g/L), medium (3.5-5 g/L), and high (>5 g/L). Yields were calculated assuming 100% elutriation in the fermenter by measuring concentration profiles within the GT. Results and Discussion Full-scale fermenter data from spring and summer 2024 and 2025 shows an estimated yield of 0.0332 mg P/mg sCOD, while literature data from BPR plants show much lower P yields per mg of sCOD, from 0.0046 to 0.0022 (Figure 1a). It was hypothesized that all additional release at Blue Plains was a result of Fe dosing and thus could be decoupled from the sCOD release (Figure 1a). Separating the data into a low (<6) and high (>6) pH scenarios show that a high pH leads to ~20% less P yield per mg sCOD, at 0.0238 mg P released per mg sCOD, compared to 0.0298 mg P/mg sCOD at a low pH (Figure 1b). Several options were explored to raise fermentate pH above 6, into a range suitable for vivianite precipitation, including alkalinity dosing, Fe overdosing, and PS dilution. Alkalinity dosing and Fe overdosing In fermentation pilot control scenarios, PS fermentation reduced sludge pH from 6.28±0.12 to 5.51±0.26, which is below the range for vivianite formation, leaving Fe and P in their soluble forms. The average control fermentate OP-P was 13.50±2.82 mg/L (Figure 2a). Lower P levels were found at fermentate pH greater than 5.83, and when sufficient iron was available for P removal (Figure 2a, b). High fermentate pH was a result of either a high lime dose (200 mg/L CaCO2), or overdosing of FeCl3 in primary treatment, which led to high levels of Fe(OH)3 in the PS. The low alkalinity scenario (CaCO3 dose of 100 mg/L) had a pH of 5.71 with 12.62 mg/L OP-P in the fermentate, while the high alkalinity scenario (CaCO3 dose of 200 mg/L) had a pH of 6.36 and 2.72 mg/L OP-P. Overall, the 200 mg/L lime dose was effective at removing P, while the lower dose may not have achieved a high enough pH for efficient P removal. Periods of higher background Fe also saw effective P removal, with pH values of 6.06 and 6.01, and OP-P at 4.76 ± 3.7 and 2.65 ± 2.4 mg/L in the decant fermentate. PS dilution Within the GT, PS elutriation resulted in a lower incoming TSS, leading to lower blanket sCOD, higher average blanket pH, and lower OP-P (Figure 3). At a pH greater than 5.75, the average OP-P was below 17.5 mg/L, while operating at a lower pH led to an average OP-P of 47.6 mg/L (Figure 3a). Fe concentrations followed a similar trend to OP-P, showing that the chemical Fe-P dynamics were modified with the change in pH (Figure 3b). Decoupling COD and P release An estimate of 0.0046 mg P/mg sCOD (Figure 1) was used to calculate P released solely from hydrolysis within the GT operating at an SRT of 0.8 to 1.5 days. Additional P release, assumed to be a result of Fe reduction, was significantly different between scenarios with a pH below and above 6 (T-test, p = 0.1126) (Figure 4). This indicates that raising the pH above 6 is a viable solution for reducing excess P release. With elutriation, the GT achieved a fermentate OP-P release of less than 17.5 mg/L, and the projected mainstream P was less than 0.4 mg/L. The lower P release at higher pH showed decoupling of OP-P and sCOD, however the projected mainstream P was not yet low enough to meet plant discharge limits of 0.18 mg P/L. This demonstrates that dilution is a low-cost practical solution to achieve target pH conditions without losing sCOD loads, however additional research is needed to understand changes in buffer capacity over different seasons and sludge characteristics. Future work includes testing in wintertime to investigate seasonal effects. Conclusions The results of the full-scale GT and fermentation pilot studies demonstrate that pH management is a viable strategy for decoupling COD and P release at CPR plants. A higher pH can be achieved through alkalinity addition, Fe overdosing, or sludge dilution. These strategies maintain good sCOD yields while decreasing P in the mainstream.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals, Biosolids, and Treatment Technology Conference in Kansas City, MO, May 11-14, 2026.
Presentation time
13:30:00
14:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionOptimizing Sludge Fermentation: Managing P Release and Recovery
Session locationKansas City Convention Center
TopicDigestion
TopicDigestion
Author(s)
Hanson, Kathryn, Davis, Sophia, Poli, JoCo, Boulware, Mekhi, Avila, Isaac, Islam, Shafkat, Massoudieh, Arash, Downing, Leon, Ladipo-Obasa, Mojolaoluwa, Miranda, Miguel, Passarelli, Nicholas, Ngo, Khoa Nam, De Clippeleir, Haydee
Author(s)K. Hanson1, S. Davis1, J. Poli2, M. Boulware, I. Avila3, S. Islam4, A. Massoudieh5, L. Downing3, M. Ladipo-Obasa1, M. Miranda1, N. Passarelli1, K. Ngo1, H. De Clippeleir1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160232
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals, Biosolids and Treatment Technology Conference
Copyright2026
Word count11

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: RBITT_2026_Proceeding
Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10127202
Get access
-10127202
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: RBITT_2026_Proceeding
Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release
Abstract
Introduction Many wastewater treatment plants rely on chemical phosphorus removal (CPR) to meet discharge limits. CPR commonly relies on iron (Fe) addition to remove phosphorus (P), and though it provides reliability, the chemical can be costly. Plants with high enough volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations are often able to use biological P removal (BPR), allowing for savings on chemical costs. Additional carbon can be supplied from primary sludge (PS) fermentation to drive BPR. There is also an opportunity to use PS fermentate to support nitrogen (N) removal in plants with low discharge limits, which are generally dependent on external carbon addition, to offset chemical costs. Despite the potential cost reduction, there are challenges with implementing PS fermentate as a carbon source. During fermentation, nutrients are released in addition to VFAs and COD. N concentrations are low compared to COD, and can be managed through PdNA or reoxidation after denitrification. P is released through hydrolysis similar to N, but in CPR plants there is an additional release of Fe-bound P due to Fe reduction under anaerobic conditions. This can be a significant issue for plants with low P limits, such as the Blue Plains AWWTP which has a 0.18 mg/L discharge limit. The objective of this study was to evaluate conditions for decoupling COD and P release by managing Fe reduction of Fe-P precipitation within the fermenter. Recent studies show that vivianite, an Fe-P mineral, may precipitate at a pH greater than 6. Therefore, it was hypothesized that pH adjustment may be a viable strategy to support optimizing CPR. In addition to elutriation, lime dosing was explored as a method for raising the pH due to its availability at Blue Plains. Materials and Methods Two 60-L fermentation pilot reactors were fed with Blue Plains PS at 5 g/L and controlled to a SRT target of 1-d. The system was operated under several test scenarios including a control: mechanical treatment, low and high microaeration, and low and high lime slurry addition (100 and 200 mg/L CaCO3). Fe overdosing in full-scale treatment also occurred during testing but was not controlled as a test scenario. Measurements were performed on influent and decant fermentate to calculate concentrations and yields. A full-scale gravity thickener (GT) at Blue Plains was converted to fermenter conditions by allowing an SRT between 0.2-2 days and was operated under full-scale conditions for sludge composition and solids loading. Influent and effluent sludges were analyzed, and data was categorized by TSS: low (<3.5 g/L), medium (3.5-5 g/L), and high (>5 g/L). Yields were calculated assuming 100% elutriation in the fermenter by measuring concentration profiles within the GT. Results and Discussion Full-scale fermenter data from spring and summer 2024 and 2025 shows an estimated yield of 0.0332 mg P/mg sCOD, while literature data from BPR plants show much lower P yields per mg of sCOD, from 0.0046 to 0.0022 (Figure 1a). It was hypothesized that all additional release at Blue Plains was a result of Fe dosing and thus could be decoupled from the sCOD release (Figure 1a). Separating the data into a low (<6) and high (>6) pH scenarios show that a high pH leads to ~20% less P yield per mg sCOD, at 0.0238 mg P released per mg sCOD, compared to 0.0298 mg P/mg sCOD at a low pH (Figure 1b). Several options were explored to raise fermentate pH above 6, into a range suitable for vivianite precipitation, including alkalinity dosing, Fe overdosing, and PS dilution. Alkalinity dosing and Fe overdosing In fermentation pilot control scenarios, PS fermentation reduced sludge pH from 6.28±0.12 to 5.51±0.26, which is below the range for vivianite formation, leaving Fe and P in their soluble forms. The average control fermentate OP-P was 13.50±2.82 mg/L (Figure 2a). Lower P levels were found at fermentate pH greater than 5.83, and when sufficient iron was available for P removal (Figure 2a, b). High fermentate pH was a result of either a high lime dose (200 mg/L CaCO2), or overdosing of FeCl3 in primary treatment, which led to high levels of Fe(OH)3 in the PS. The low alkalinity scenario (CaCO3 dose of 100 mg/L) had a pH of 5.71 with 12.62 mg/L OP-P in the fermentate, while the high alkalinity scenario (CaCO3 dose of 200 mg/L) had a pH of 6.36 and 2.72 mg/L OP-P. Overall, the 200 mg/L lime dose was effective at removing P, while the lower dose may not have achieved a high enough pH for efficient P removal. Periods of higher background Fe also saw effective P removal, with pH values of 6.06 and 6.01, and OP-P at 4.76 ± 3.7 and 2.65 ± 2.4 mg/L in the decant fermentate. PS dilution Within the GT, PS elutriation resulted in a lower incoming TSS, leading to lower blanket sCOD, higher average blanket pH, and lower OP-P (Figure 3). At a pH greater than 5.75, the average OP-P was below 17.5 mg/L, while operating at a lower pH led to an average OP-P of 47.6 mg/L (Figure 3a). Fe concentrations followed a similar trend to OP-P, showing that the chemical Fe-P dynamics were modified with the change in pH (Figure 3b). Decoupling COD and P release An estimate of 0.0046 mg P/mg sCOD (Figure 1) was used to calculate P released solely from hydrolysis within the GT operating at an SRT of 0.8 to 1.5 days. Additional P release, assumed to be a result of Fe reduction, was significantly different between scenarios with a pH below and above 6 (T-test, p = 0.1126) (Figure 4). This indicates that raising the pH above 6 is a viable solution for reducing excess P release. With elutriation, the GT achieved a fermentate OP-P release of less than 17.5 mg/L, and the projected mainstream P was less than 0.4 mg/L. The lower P release at higher pH showed decoupling of OP-P and sCOD, however the projected mainstream P was not yet low enough to meet plant discharge limits of 0.18 mg P/L. This demonstrates that dilution is a low-cost practical solution to achieve target pH conditions without losing sCOD loads, however additional research is needed to understand changes in buffer capacity over different seasons and sludge characteristics. Future work includes testing in wintertime to investigate seasonal effects. Conclusions The results of the full-scale GT and fermentation pilot studies demonstrate that pH management is a viable strategy for decoupling COD and P release at CPR plants. A higher pH can be achieved through alkalinity addition, Fe overdosing, or sludge dilution. These strategies maintain good sCOD yields while decreasing P in the mainstream.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals, Biosolids, and Treatment Technology Conference in Kansas City, MO, May 11-14, 2026.
Presentation time
13:30:00
14:00:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionOptimizing Sludge Fermentation: Managing P Release and Recovery
Session locationKansas City Convention Center
TopicDigestion
TopicDigestion
Author(s)
Hanson, Kathryn, Davis, Sophia, Poli, JoCo, Boulware, Mekhi, Avila, Isaac, Islam, Shafkat, Massoudieh, Arash, Downing, Leon, Ladipo-Obasa, Mojolaoluwa, Miranda, Miguel, Passarelli, Nicholas, Ngo, Khoa Nam, De Clippeleir, Haydee
Author(s)K. Hanson1, S. Davis1, J. Poli2, M. Boulware, I. Avila3, S. Islam4, A. Massoudieh5, L. Downing3, M. Ladipo-Obasa1, M. Miranda1, N. Passarelli1, K. Ngo1, H. De Clippeleir1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160232
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals, Biosolids and Treatment Technology Conference
Copyright2026
Word count11

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Hanson, Kathryn. Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Web. 25 Jul. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10127202CITANCHOR>.
Hanson, Kathryn. Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Accessed July 25, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10127202CITANCHOR.
Hanson, Kathryn
Primary Sludge Fermentation in Chem-P Plants: Decoupling P-Release from C-Release
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
May 13, 2026
July 25, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10127202CITANCHOR