Access Water | AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor...
lastID = -10128142
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled...
AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2026-09-25 14:52:51 Chris Lewis Continuous release
  • 2026-09-11 09:59:56 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled...
AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool

AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool

AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled...
AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool
Abstract
Wastewater pumping stations account for 15-70% of electricity consumption in wastewater treatment plants, depending on different situations. Wastewater pumping stations with multiple pumps and mixed actuation (fixed-speed plus VFD units) face strongly time-varying inflow and a discrete–continuous, non-convex scheduling space. Energy-efficient operation is thus intrinsically a coupled prediction–optimization problem: without reliable inflow forecasts and tractable global search, controllers tend to be conservative or myopic, leading to avoidable energy waste. This paper proposes an AI-driven framework that combines a soft-sensor enabled inflow predictor with optimization algorithms to generate implementable, energy-minimizing pump schedules. Methodology The method is developed on the basis of three components: the physical plant, the predictive soft sensor, and the scheduling optimizer, which interact with one another in accordance with specific rules (Figure 1). The basic water balance equation and pump outflow equation formed the basis of the prediction for the soft-sensor, and machine learning models were tested to refine estimates. The evaluated architectures included: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks. Input features include wet-well water level, pump operational status, frequency settings, and temporal derivatives (level change rate) to capture dynamic behavior. The predicted inflow trajectory becomes the exogenous input to the scheduling optimizer. The scheduling problem is formulated to minimize energy consumption while maintaining operational feasibility. In this case, decisions include discrete pump commitment (on/off for four fixed-speed pumps) and continuous frequency set-points for two VFD pumps, yielding a mixed-integer, non-convex search space. Four solvers are evaluated under the same objective and constraints: (i) Genetic Algorithm (GA), (ii) Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), (iii) a Hybrid scheme implementing GA warm-start followed by PSO local refined search, and (iv) a Greedy heuristic. All four solvers are supposed to simultaneously serve the goals of satisfying the flow rate requirement, minimizing energy consumption, and controlling the water level within range. Results and Discussion A real wastewater treatment plant dataset is used for validation. Two of the three models for the soft sensor achieves excellent inflow prediction accuracy (R² > 0.99), demonstrating that level-and-discharge-only sensing can provide high-fidelity inflow information without direct inflow metering. Specifically, Gradient Boosting (GB) achieved the highest accuracy with an R² of 0.9983, an RMSE of 8.19 m³/h, and an MAE of 1.10 m³/h. Random Forest (RF) followed closely (R² = 0.9958, RMSE = 12.73 m³/h, MAE = 1.57 m³/h), as shown in Figure 2. In contrast, the LSTM model exhibited lower performance, potentially due to the complexity of capturing long-term dependencies in the inflow profile. The ensemble model also demonstrated robust performance (R² = 0.9979, RMSE = 8.99 m³/h, MAE = 1.17 m³/h), though it did not surpass the standalone GB model. These results indicate that for this specific application, tree-based architectures (GB and RF) are more effective than LSTM in handling the system's non-linear dynamics. In the pump optimization section, a ten - day retrospective study reveals that the water level and flow rate remained unchanged before and after optimization (data lines overlapped), demonstrating the algorithms' precise flow rate management capability (Figure 1). The pump operation strategy shows that the number of running pumps decreased from 3 to 2 within the initial 136 hours, leading to energy savings. The results of different algorithms indicate that the Genetic Algorithm (GA), the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and the Hybrid warm-start + local search method consistently produce the optimal schedules. In contrast, the Greedy heuristic often converges to solutions that are locally optimal but globally sub-optimal, reflecting the non-convex mixed-integer structure of the problem. By utilizing the most effective optimizer, the overall energy consumption is reduced by 25.1% compared to the baseline operation (Figure 4). Overall, the proposed framework couples a soft-sensor with predictive scheduling, turning wet-well level and outflow signals into forward-looking inflow information and thereby shifting pump-station operation from reactive responses to anticipation-based decision-making. In this closed loop, the optimization controller leverages global search to escape poor local minima and local refinement to efficiently tune both discrete pump switching and continuous VFD set-points, providing constraint-compliant and energy-efficient operation despite the mixed-integer, non-convex nature of the problem. Conclusion This work presents a prediction-informed optimization methodology for multi-pump wastewater stations in which a soft sensor transforms readily available measurements (wet-well level and discharge flow) into accurate inflow forecasts that directly drive a mixed-integer scheduling optimizer. Real-plant backtesting confirms high predictive performance and substantial energy savings, and it shows that global metaheuristics are essential for reliably solving non-convex multi-pump coordination problems.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Presentation time
09:00:00
09:30:00
Session time
8:30:00
9:30:00
SessionFrom Reactive to Predictive: AI Enabled Wastewater Operations 
Session locationErnest N. Morial Convention Center
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design
Author(s)
Han, Mofei, Chen, Jun, Li, Feiyi
Author(s)M. Han1, J. Chen1, F. Li1
Author affiliation(s)CSD Water Service Co. Ltd., 1CSD Water Service, 1CSD Water Service, 1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160307
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2026
Word count11

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled...
AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10128142
Get access
-10128142
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled...
AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool
Abstract
Wastewater pumping stations account for 15-70% of electricity consumption in wastewater treatment plants, depending on different situations. Wastewater pumping stations with multiple pumps and mixed actuation (fixed-speed plus VFD units) face strongly time-varying inflow and a discrete–continuous, non-convex scheduling space. Energy-efficient operation is thus intrinsically a coupled prediction–optimization problem: without reliable inflow forecasts and tractable global search, controllers tend to be conservative or myopic, leading to avoidable energy waste. This paper proposes an AI-driven framework that combines a soft-sensor enabled inflow predictor with optimization algorithms to generate implementable, energy-minimizing pump schedules. Methodology The method is developed on the basis of three components: the physical plant, the predictive soft sensor, and the scheduling optimizer, which interact with one another in accordance with specific rules (Figure 1). The basic water balance equation and pump outflow equation formed the basis of the prediction for the soft-sensor, and machine learning models were tested to refine estimates. The evaluated architectures included: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks. Input features include wet-well water level, pump operational status, frequency settings, and temporal derivatives (level change rate) to capture dynamic behavior. The predicted inflow trajectory becomes the exogenous input to the scheduling optimizer. The scheduling problem is formulated to minimize energy consumption while maintaining operational feasibility. In this case, decisions include discrete pump commitment (on/off for four fixed-speed pumps) and continuous frequency set-points for two VFD pumps, yielding a mixed-integer, non-convex search space. Four solvers are evaluated under the same objective and constraints: (i) Genetic Algorithm (GA), (ii) Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), (iii) a Hybrid scheme implementing GA warm-start followed by PSO local refined search, and (iv) a Greedy heuristic. All four solvers are supposed to simultaneously serve the goals of satisfying the flow rate requirement, minimizing energy consumption, and controlling the water level within range. Results and Discussion A real wastewater treatment plant dataset is used for validation. Two of the three models for the soft sensor achieves excellent inflow prediction accuracy (R² > 0.99), demonstrating that level-and-discharge-only sensing can provide high-fidelity inflow information without direct inflow metering. Specifically, Gradient Boosting (GB) achieved the highest accuracy with an R² of 0.9983, an RMSE of 8.19 m³/h, and an MAE of 1.10 m³/h. Random Forest (RF) followed closely (R² = 0.9958, RMSE = 12.73 m³/h, MAE = 1.57 m³/h), as shown in Figure 2. In contrast, the LSTM model exhibited lower performance, potentially due to the complexity of capturing long-term dependencies in the inflow profile. The ensemble model also demonstrated robust performance (R² = 0.9979, RMSE = 8.99 m³/h, MAE = 1.17 m³/h), though it did not surpass the standalone GB model. These results indicate that for this specific application, tree-based architectures (GB and RF) are more effective than LSTM in handling the system's non-linear dynamics. In the pump optimization section, a ten - day retrospective study reveals that the water level and flow rate remained unchanged before and after optimization (data lines overlapped), demonstrating the algorithms' precise flow rate management capability (Figure 1). The pump operation strategy shows that the number of running pumps decreased from 3 to 2 within the initial 136 hours, leading to energy savings. The results of different algorithms indicate that the Genetic Algorithm (GA), the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and the Hybrid warm-start + local search method consistently produce the optimal schedules. In contrast, the Greedy heuristic often converges to solutions that are locally optimal but globally sub-optimal, reflecting the non-convex mixed-integer structure of the problem. By utilizing the most effective optimizer, the overall energy consumption is reduced by 25.1% compared to the baseline operation (Figure 4). Overall, the proposed framework couples a soft-sensor with predictive scheduling, turning wet-well level and outflow signals into forward-looking inflow information and thereby shifting pump-station operation from reactive responses to anticipation-based decision-making. In this closed loop, the optimization controller leverages global search to escape poor local minima and local refinement to efficiently tune both discrete pump switching and continuous VFD set-points, providing constraint-compliant and energy-efficient operation despite the mixed-integer, non-convex nature of the problem. Conclusion This work presents a prediction-informed optimization methodology for multi-pump wastewater stations in which a soft sensor transforms readily available measurements (wet-well level and discharge flow) into accurate inflow forecasts that directly drive a mixed-integer scheduling optimizer. Real-plant backtesting confirms high predictive performance and substantial energy savings, and it shows that global metaheuristics are essential for reliably solving non-convex multi-pump coordination problems.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Presentation time
09:00:00
09:30:00
Session time
8:30:00
9:30:00
SessionFrom Reactive to Predictive: AI Enabled Wastewater Operations 
Session locationErnest N. Morial Convention Center
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design
Author(s)
Han, Mofei, Chen, Jun, Li, Feiyi
Author(s)M. Han1, J. Chen1, F. Li1
Author affiliation(s)CSD Water Service Co. Ltd., 1CSD Water Service, 1CSD Water Service, 1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160307
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2026
Word count11

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Han, Mofei. AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Web. 29 Sep. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10128142CITANCHOR>.
Han, Mofei. AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Accessed September 29, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10128142CITANCHOR.
Han, Mofei
AI-Driven Wastewater Multi-Pump Station Optimization Using Soft-sensor Enabled Predictive Tool
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2026
September 29, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10128142CITANCHOR