Access Water | Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
lastID = -10128372
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2026-09-25 14:52:37 Chris Lewis Continuous release
  • 2026-09-11 10:58:46 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control

Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control

Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Abstract
At the outset, Hite Creek Water Quality Treatment Center (WQTC) serving the Louisville Metropolitan Sewer District faced significant uncertainty regarding the sources of persistent odor complaints. Potential contributors included emissions from on-site treatment processes, fugitive releases at force main and gravity interceptor discharge points along the plant fenceline, and other unidentified sources. WQTC receives flow from five force mains and one 30' gravity trunk sewer. Two force mains with long detention times were suspected to be major contributors to elevated sulfide levels and associated odor at their discharge locations. This study was undertaken to identify the root causes of odor generation using advanced, continuous monitoring technologies to quantify sulfide in the collection system and at the plant influent. The field findings were used to develop a calibrated Mega-WATS sewer process model to optimize chemical dosing strategies, minimizing sulfide loads entering the plant and reducing fugitive emissions. The observed benefits and challenges associated with deploying advanced SulfiLogger technology for continuous measurement of dissolved sulfide at ten monitoring locations across the system are also discussed. Fieldwork included grab sampling and continuous measurements for key liquid and vapor phase parameters at selected locations in the collection system. Dissolved sulfide field measurements were collected using a combination of grab sampling field test kits (LaMotte and Gastec) and advanced continuous monitoring technology (SulfiLogger). At several locations when multiple sampling methods were used, average and maximum dissolved sulfide data recorded by the SulfiLogger differed significantly from measurements obtained through grab sampling. Grab samples capture sulfide concentrations only at a single moment in time, whereas the SulfiLogger continuously records data and reveals the full diurnal pattern. Grab sampling measurements also require manual handling of samples, which can introduce additional uncertainty to dissolved sulfide measurements that are already highly sensitive to rapid oxidation and turbulence. In addition, colorimetric nature of analysis kits relies on visual interpretation, making the results subject to the eyesight of the operator. While the SulfiLogger overcomes many limitations of grab sampling by providing continuous, high-frequency measurements that capture diurnal sulfide patterns, a few challenges were encountered during the study. The SulfiLogger system requires stainless steel accessories, which increases mobilization, transport, storage, and assembly time compared to grab sampling. The stainless-steel accessories were not always compatible with manhole covers or wet well hatches, limiting the ability to properly stabilize the unit. Poor stabilization allowed wastewater forces to buffet the device during deployment, degrading data quality and resulting in equipment damage. At the Glen Oaks and Chamberlain force main discharges (Figure 1) near the plant fenceline, stabilization was not possible, and turbulent drop conditions caused rapid sulfide volatilization. Repeated impacts due to wastewater force caused extensive wear to devices, rendering two sensors nonfunctional. Also, SulfiLogger data is usable only when the sensor remains fully submerged. At deep or cyclic discharge locations, periods of air exposure required removal using engineering judgment based on temperature trends. Additionally, the SulfiLogger measures aqueous H₂S. Total dissolved sulfide, bisulfide (HS⁻) and sulfide ion (S²⁻) are derived using simultaneous pH measurements, Henry's law, and acid dissociation constants for hydrogen sulfide. Post-processing to convert raw H₂S data to total dissolved sulfide was performed using the licensed pHSulfi tool operating on the Mega-WATS platform. Depending on pH variability within the system, the calculated total dissolved sulfide concentrations were observed to be substantially higher than the measured dissolved H₂S alone. Because H₂S is the dominant sulfide species mainly at pH values below 7, studies that rely on base addition to shift sulfide speciation and mitigate odors are limited when evaluated using SulfiLogger data alone. Even without base chemical dosing, when pH exceeds 8 there is very little dissolved H₂S; therefore, total dissolved sulfide estimates derived from SulfiLogger measurements are subject to reduced accuracy. The paper evaluates fugitive emissions from gravity sewer manholes and describes development of calibrated Mega-WATS sewer process models for five force mains using field data. The evaluation also includes multiple chemical dosing strategies and what-if scenarios to identify an optimized dosing approach to mitigate sulfide formation within the force mains and at subsequent discharge locations along the plant fenceline to reduce odors in the vicinity of the plant. Results from the collection system field work and sewer process modeling conducted in this study were used in conjunction with a separate, parallel air dispersion modeling effort to develop odor management recommendations aimed at reducing impacts to the surrounding neighborhood.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Presentation time
13:30:00
13:45:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionA Model Odor Control Session
Session locationErnest N. Morial Convention Center
TopicAir Quality and Odor Management, Collection Systems, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Public Communication and Outreach
TopicAir Quality and Odor Management, Collection Systems, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Public Communication and Outreach
Author(s)
Mathure, Mugdha, Ward, Matthew, McEwen, David, Burch, Robin
Author(s)M. Mathure1, M. Ward2, D. McEwen1, R. Burch3
Author affiliation(s)Brown and Caldwell, 1The WATS Guys, Inc., 2Brown and Caldwell, 1Louisville & Jefferson County MSD, 3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160537
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2026
Word count10

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10128372
Get access
-10128372
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Abstract
At the outset, Hite Creek Water Quality Treatment Center (WQTC) serving the Louisville Metropolitan Sewer District faced significant uncertainty regarding the sources of persistent odor complaints. Potential contributors included emissions from on-site treatment processes, fugitive releases at force main and gravity interceptor discharge points along the plant fenceline, and other unidentified sources. WQTC receives flow from five force mains and one 30' gravity trunk sewer. Two force mains with long detention times were suspected to be major contributors to elevated sulfide levels and associated odor at their discharge locations. This study was undertaken to identify the root causes of odor generation using advanced, continuous monitoring technologies to quantify sulfide in the collection system and at the plant influent. The field findings were used to develop a calibrated Mega-WATS sewer process model to optimize chemical dosing strategies, minimizing sulfide loads entering the plant and reducing fugitive emissions. The observed benefits and challenges associated with deploying advanced SulfiLogger technology for continuous measurement of dissolved sulfide at ten monitoring locations across the system are also discussed. Fieldwork included grab sampling and continuous measurements for key liquid and vapor phase parameters at selected locations in the collection system. Dissolved sulfide field measurements were collected using a combination of grab sampling field test kits (LaMotte and Gastec) and advanced continuous monitoring technology (SulfiLogger). At several locations when multiple sampling methods were used, average and maximum dissolved sulfide data recorded by the SulfiLogger differed significantly from measurements obtained through grab sampling. Grab samples capture sulfide concentrations only at a single moment in time, whereas the SulfiLogger continuously records data and reveals the full diurnal pattern. Grab sampling measurements also require manual handling of samples, which can introduce additional uncertainty to dissolved sulfide measurements that are already highly sensitive to rapid oxidation and turbulence. In addition, colorimetric nature of analysis kits relies on visual interpretation, making the results subject to the eyesight of the operator. While the SulfiLogger overcomes many limitations of grab sampling by providing continuous, high-frequency measurements that capture diurnal sulfide patterns, a few challenges were encountered during the study. The SulfiLogger system requires stainless steel accessories, which increases mobilization, transport, storage, and assembly time compared to grab sampling. The stainless-steel accessories were not always compatible with manhole covers or wet well hatches, limiting the ability to properly stabilize the unit. Poor stabilization allowed wastewater forces to buffet the device during deployment, degrading data quality and resulting in equipment damage. At the Glen Oaks and Chamberlain force main discharges (Figure 1) near the plant fenceline, stabilization was not possible, and turbulent drop conditions caused rapid sulfide volatilization. Repeated impacts due to wastewater force caused extensive wear to devices, rendering two sensors nonfunctional. Also, SulfiLogger data is usable only when the sensor remains fully submerged. At deep or cyclic discharge locations, periods of air exposure required removal using engineering judgment based on temperature trends. Additionally, the SulfiLogger measures aqueous H₂S. Total dissolved sulfide, bisulfide (HS⁻) and sulfide ion (S²⁻) are derived using simultaneous pH measurements, Henry's law, and acid dissociation constants for hydrogen sulfide. Post-processing to convert raw H₂S data to total dissolved sulfide was performed using the licensed pHSulfi tool operating on the Mega-WATS platform. Depending on pH variability within the system, the calculated total dissolved sulfide concentrations were observed to be substantially higher than the measured dissolved H₂S alone. Because H₂S is the dominant sulfide species mainly at pH values below 7, studies that rely on base addition to shift sulfide speciation and mitigate odors are limited when evaluated using SulfiLogger data alone. Even without base chemical dosing, when pH exceeds 8 there is very little dissolved H₂S; therefore, total dissolved sulfide estimates derived from SulfiLogger measurements are subject to reduced accuracy. The paper evaluates fugitive emissions from gravity sewer manholes and describes development of calibrated Mega-WATS sewer process models for five force mains using field data. The evaluation also includes multiple chemical dosing strategies and what-if scenarios to identify an optimized dosing approach to mitigate sulfide formation within the force mains and at subsequent discharge locations along the plant fenceline to reduce odors in the vicinity of the plant. Results from the collection system field work and sewer process modeling conducted in this study were used in conjunction with a separate, parallel air dispersion modeling effort to develop odor management recommendations aimed at reducing impacts to the surrounding neighborhood.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Presentation time
13:30:00
13:45:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionA Model Odor Control Session
Session locationErnest N. Morial Convention Center
TopicAir Quality and Odor Management, Collection Systems, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Public Communication and Outreach
TopicAir Quality and Odor Management, Collection Systems, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Public Communication and Outreach
Author(s)
Mathure, Mugdha, Ward, Matthew, McEwen, David, Burch, Robin
Author(s)M. Mathure1, M. Ward2, D. McEwen1, R. Burch3
Author affiliation(s)Brown and Caldwell, 1The WATS Guys, Inc., 2Brown and Caldwell, 1Louisville & Jefferson County MSD, 3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160537
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2026
Word count10

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Mathure, Mugdha. Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Web. 1 Nov. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10128372CITANCHOR>.
Mathure, Mugdha. Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10128372CITANCHOR.
Mathure, Mugdha
Advanced Monitoring and Sewer Process Modeling for Odor Control
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 29, 2026
November 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10128372CITANCHOR