lastID = -277954
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 13:34:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 13:34:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:34:05 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:34:04 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:34:03 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment

Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment

Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Abstract
Direct Potable Reuse (DPR) is the supply of highly treated reclaimed water directly to a drinking water treatment plant or distribution system, with or without an engineered storage buffer. This differs from Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) which is already practiced in many areas of the country and involves the inclusion of an environmental buffer (such as a lake, reservoir or aquifer) prior to arriving at the intake for a drinking water treatment plant. There are a number of potential benefits of DPR relative to IPR, including reduced energy requirements, reduced construction costs and reduced operational costs. DPR may even provide an opportunity to allow potable reuse in situations where a suitable environmental buffer is not available for IPR.However, a potential obstacle to implementation of DPR is related to the perception and acceptance of potential risks rather than science or engineering that quantify those risks and provide solutions to address them. A number of technical issues relating to the perceived functions of an environmental buffer need to be addressed in a transparent process, including in particular the need to ensure consistent and assured levels of reliability.Critical control points (CCPs) are defined at steps in a treatment train where control can be applied and is essential to prevent or eliminate a public health risk associated with a water quality hazard or reduce it to an acceptable level. It can include specific treatment processes but also chemical addition steps. CCPs must have both a monitoring component, which allows the operator to verify that the process is operating as intended, and a control component, which allows the operator to adjust the functioning of the unit process to improve its performance. While there are many “critical” aspects to the proper and efficient operation of a water, wastewater, or water reuse facility, there are only a handful that have direct bearing on the public health implications of water from that facility. This is a key concept as it allows operations staff to better manage various alarms and issues that will inevitably arise in any treatment process, focusing on those that are critical to public health protection.However, even with CCPs and a well-trained operations team in place it is important that multiple barriers be a component of direct potable reuse (DPR) systems to manage the total risk from chemical and microbial threats to public health. Our team has been working on a WateReuse-funded project (13-03) to demonstrate the robustness and reliability of DPR processes and to quantify the impacts of specific critical control points within a DPR system to help overcome this obstacle.Through this project we have identified critical control points (CCPs) for both a full advanced treatment (FAT) membrane based process (MF/RO/UV H2O2/Cl2) and a non-membrane treatment system (Floc/Sed/O3/BAC/GAC/Cl2) using a hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) team process and risk assessment. By incorporating a combination of both operational and maintenance data from full scale operating facilities we have been able to quantify the role of each CCP and then use Monte Carlo analysis to demonstrate the robustness (that is the concentration of contaminants that a given process train can handle) and the redundancy (that is the number of processes that can handle a given contaminant) across all of the CCPs in each DPR treatment train. Inherently present in the full-scale operational data is also the reliability aspect of each unit process. Thus, when full-scale data are combined across each unit process/CCP, a Monte Carlo analysis can provide insight into the “worst” case scenarios and then quantify those with a value for probability of occurrence.This presentation will provide an overview of the CCPs selected for the two water recycling treatment trains and then will demonstrate the use of Monte Carlo to develop the probability distributions across the processes. The presentation will focus on microbial data in addition to several key chemical parameters and potential surrogate parameters.
Direct Potable Reuse (DPR) is the supply of highly treated reclaimed water directly to a drinking water treatment plant or distribution system, with or without an engineered storage buffer. This differs from Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) which is already practiced in many areas of the country and involves the inclusion of an environmental buffer (such as a lake, reservoir or aquifer) prior to...
Author(s)
Ben StanfordTroy WalkerStuart KhanShane SnyderCedric Robillot
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819540810
Volume / Issue2015 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count657

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-277954
Get access
-277954
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Abstract
Direct Potable Reuse (DPR) is the supply of highly treated reclaimed water directly to a drinking water treatment plant or distribution system, with or without an engineered storage buffer. This differs from Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) which is already practiced in many areas of the country and involves the inclusion of an environmental buffer (such as a lake, reservoir or aquifer) prior to arriving at the intake for a drinking water treatment plant. There are a number of potential benefits of DPR relative to IPR, including reduced energy requirements, reduced construction costs and reduced operational costs. DPR may even provide an opportunity to allow potable reuse in situations where a suitable environmental buffer is not available for IPR.However, a potential obstacle to implementation of DPR is related to the perception and acceptance of potential risks rather than science or engineering that quantify those risks and provide solutions to address them. A number of technical issues relating to the perceived functions of an environmental buffer need to be addressed in a transparent process, including in particular the need to ensure consistent and assured levels of reliability.Critical control points (CCPs) are defined at steps in a treatment train where control can be applied and is essential to prevent or eliminate a public health risk associated with a water quality hazard or reduce it to an acceptable level. It can include specific treatment processes but also chemical addition steps. CCPs must have both a monitoring component, which allows the operator to verify that the process is operating as intended, and a control component, which allows the operator to adjust the functioning of the unit process to improve its performance. While there are many “critical” aspects to the proper and efficient operation of a water, wastewater, or water reuse facility, there are only a handful that have direct bearing on the public health implications of water from that facility. This is a key concept as it allows operations staff to better manage various alarms and issues that will inevitably arise in any treatment process, focusing on those that are critical to public health protection.However, even with CCPs and a well-trained operations team in place it is important that multiple barriers be a component of direct potable reuse (DPR) systems to manage the total risk from chemical and microbial threats to public health. Our team has been working on a WateReuse-funded project (13-03) to demonstrate the robustness and reliability of DPR processes and to quantify the impacts of specific critical control points within a DPR system to help overcome this obstacle.Through this project we have identified critical control points (CCPs) for both a full advanced treatment (FAT) membrane based process (MF/RO/UV H2O2/Cl2) and a non-membrane treatment system (Floc/Sed/O3/BAC/GAC/Cl2) using a hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) team process and risk assessment. By incorporating a combination of both operational and maintenance data from full scale operating facilities we have been able to quantify the role of each CCP and then use Monte Carlo analysis to demonstrate the robustness (that is the concentration of contaminants that a given process train can handle) and the redundancy (that is the number of processes that can handle a given contaminant) across all of the CCPs in each DPR treatment train. Inherently present in the full-scale operational data is also the reliability aspect of each unit process. Thus, when full-scale data are combined across each unit process/CCP, a Monte Carlo analysis can provide insight into the “worst” case scenarios and then quantify those with a value for probability of occurrence.This presentation will provide an overview of the CCPs selected for the two water recycling treatment trains and then will demonstrate the use of Monte Carlo to develop the probability distributions across the processes. The presentation will focus on microbial data in addition to several key chemical parameters and potential surrogate parameters.
Direct Potable Reuse (DPR) is the supply of highly treated reclaimed water directly to a drinking water treatment plant or distribution system, with or without an engineered storage buffer. This differs from Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) which is already practiced in many areas of the country and involves the inclusion of an environmental buffer (such as a lake, reservoir or aquifer) prior to...
Author(s)
Ben StanfordTroy WalkerStuart KhanShane SnyderCedric Robillot
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819540810
Volume / Issue2015 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count657

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Ben Stanford# Troy Walker# Stuart Khan# Shane Snyder# Cedric Robillot. Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 20 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-277954CITANCHOR>.
Ben Stanford# Troy Walker# Stuart Khan# Shane Snyder# Cedric Robillot. Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed May 20, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-277954CITANCHOR.
Ben Stanford# Troy Walker# Stuart Khan# Shane Snyder# Cedric Robillot
Critical Control Points in DPR: Quantifying the Multi-Barrier Approach to Treatment
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
May 20, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-277954CITANCHOR