lastID = -279319
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 14:23:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 14:23:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:05:40 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:05:39 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:05:38 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration

Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration

Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Abstract
Wastewater generated from a locomotive engine remanufacturing facility is currently pretreated and discharged to the municipal sewer system. Process wastewater generated at the facility contains high concentrations of oils and soluble metals. The sewer authority advised the railroad company that stringent metals limits may soon be enforced as a result of modifications to the authority’s NPDES discharge permit. In anticipation of the new limits, the company embarked on a program to improve their wastewater pretreatment system, including evaluation of alternate treatment technologies such as ultrafiltration.A three-month pilot study was conducted at the facility to evaluate the performance and long-term operating considerations for two wastewater streams: effluent from an existing oil/water separator, and clarifier effluent after chemical emulsion-breaking and gravity separation. The pilot trials demonstrated that ultrafiltration technology provides superior effluent quality compared to the facility’s existing pretreatment system, with complete removal of suspended solids, emulsified oil and grease, and precipitated metals. High concentrations of emulsified oil and grease and metals in the facility’s oil/water separator effluent were readily removed by the ultrafiltration test unit. This paper presents the pilot study experimental design and performance data, including design considerations for the full-scale ultrafiltration system.
Wastewater generated from a locomotive engine remanufacturing facility is currently pretreated and discharged to the municipal sewer system. Process wastewater generated at the facility contains high concentrations of oils and soluble metals. The sewer authority advised the railroad company that stringent metals limits may soon be enforced as a result of modifications to the authority’s...
Author(s)
Lucy PughLara ThurnSamuel KarlovichAndrew Marcinkowski
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2016
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864716819714681
Volume / Issue2016 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2016
Word count203

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-279319
Get access
-279319
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Abstract
Wastewater generated from a locomotive engine remanufacturing facility is currently pretreated and discharged to the municipal sewer system. Process wastewater generated at the facility contains high concentrations of oils and soluble metals. The sewer authority advised the railroad company that stringent metals limits may soon be enforced as a result of modifications to the authority’s NPDES discharge permit. In anticipation of the new limits, the company embarked on a program to improve their wastewater pretreatment system, including evaluation of alternate treatment technologies such as ultrafiltration.A three-month pilot study was conducted at the facility to evaluate the performance and long-term operating considerations for two wastewater streams: effluent from an existing oil/water separator, and clarifier effluent after chemical emulsion-breaking and gravity separation. The pilot trials demonstrated that ultrafiltration technology provides superior effluent quality compared to the facility’s existing pretreatment system, with complete removal of suspended solids, emulsified oil and grease, and precipitated metals. High concentrations of emulsified oil and grease and metals in the facility’s oil/water separator effluent were readily removed by the ultrafiltration test unit. This paper presents the pilot study experimental design and performance data, including design considerations for the full-scale ultrafiltration system.
Wastewater generated from a locomotive engine remanufacturing facility is currently pretreated and discharged to the municipal sewer system. Process wastewater generated at the facility contains high concentrations of oils and soluble metals. The sewer authority advised the railroad company that stringent metals limits may soon be enforced as a result of modifications to the authority’s...
Author(s)
Lucy PughLara ThurnSamuel KarlovichAndrew Marcinkowski
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2016
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864716819714681
Volume / Issue2016 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2016
Word count203

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Lucy Pugh# Lara Thurn# Samuel Karlovich# Andrew Marcinkowski. Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 22 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-279319CITANCHOR>.
Lucy Pugh# Lara Thurn# Samuel Karlovich# Andrew Marcinkowski. Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 22, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-279319CITANCHOR.
Lucy Pugh# Lara Thurn# Samuel Karlovich# Andrew Marcinkowski
Locomotive Engine Rebuild Wastewater Proves No Match for Ultrafiltration
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 22, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-279319CITANCHOR