lastID = -280227
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices...
A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 19:56:13 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:57:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:57:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 21:00:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 21:00:13 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 17:11:09 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 17:11:08 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 02:18:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:18:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:02:22 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:02:21 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices...
A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility

A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility

A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices...
A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility
Abstract
Employees of municipal water and wastewater utilities are talented and have deep personal interest in delivering these essential services. This skilled and dedicated workforce can find it difficult to make decisions about significant matters and have them stick because of differing opinions and organizational culture. A large U.S. water utility used a structured decision process, effectively to help reach decisions about a $100-million treatment facility.Decision making on major projects can be complicated and lengthy, causing delays, especially in projects with short timelines. Large numbers of stakeholders, both internal and external to the organization, can also influence the timing and ability to reach decisions. Yet another factor in complicated projects is the tendency to “second-guess” decisions, which causes a lot of re-work and re-hashing of ground already churned.This paper describes the approach that one utility used to help it reach critical decisions about project elements, how it took steps to engage stakeholders in the process, and how the results were validated. The combination of effective approaches, tools, and communication were brought together in a fashion proved to be a recipe for successful decision making and for results that did not return for reconsideration.
Employees of municipal water and wastewater utilities are talented and have deep personal interest in delivering these essential services. This skilled and dedicated workforce can find it difficult to make decisions about significant matters and have them stick because of differing opinions and organizational culture. A large U.S. water utility used a structured decision process, effectively to...
Author(s)
David PetersDale JutilaDan Speicher
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811694947
Volume / Issue2012 / 1
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
Copyright2012
Word count210

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices...
A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-280227
Get access
-280227
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices...
A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility
Abstract
Employees of municipal water and wastewater utilities are talented and have deep personal interest in delivering these essential services. This skilled and dedicated workforce can find it difficult to make decisions about significant matters and have them stick because of differing opinions and organizational culture. A large U.S. water utility used a structured decision process, effectively to help reach decisions about a $100-million treatment facility.Decision making on major projects can be complicated and lengthy, causing delays, especially in projects with short timelines. Large numbers of stakeholders, both internal and external to the organization, can also influence the timing and ability to reach decisions. Yet another factor in complicated projects is the tendency to “second-guess” decisions, which causes a lot of re-work and re-hashing of ground already churned.This paper describes the approach that one utility used to help it reach critical decisions about project elements, how it took steps to engage stakeholders in the process, and how the results were validated. The combination of effective approaches, tools, and communication were brought together in a fashion proved to be a recipe for successful decision making and for results that did not return for reconsideration.
Employees of municipal water and wastewater utilities are talented and have deep personal interest in delivering these essential services. This skilled and dedicated workforce can find it difficult to make decisions about significant matters and have them stick because of differing opinions and organizational culture. A large U.S. water utility used a structured decision process, effectively to...
Author(s)
David PetersDale JutilaDan Speicher
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811694947
Volume / Issue2012 / 1
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
Copyright2012
Word count210

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
David Peters# Dale Jutila# Dan Speicher. A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-280227CITANCHOR>.
David Peters# Dale Jutila# Dan Speicher. A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280227CITANCHOR.
David Peters# Dale Jutila# Dan Speicher
A Structured Decision-Making Process and Staff Engagement Result in Sound Choices for a Major Treatment Facility
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280227CITANCHOR