lastID = -280581
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W12-Proceedings
Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 01:12:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:12:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 06:04:44 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:04:43 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W12-Proceedings
Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River

Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River

Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W12-Proceedings
Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River
Abstract
IntroductionAs part of the new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 permit regulations for Tennessee, all impaired waterbodies within the city limits are required to have visual impairment inventories performed within the 5-year permit cycle. CDM Smith performed a visual stream assessment for a watershed in West Tennessee within the urbanized portion of the waterbody. The waterbody also included several sections that are impaired for pathogens, as listed on the State's 2010 303(d) list. As part of the pathogen total maximum daily load (TMDL) for the waterbody, a visual stream impairment inventory is also required to be performed within 5 years of the TMDL issuance.The ScopeA unique aspect of this project is the fact that the waterbody is a non-wadeable stream. Several protocols already exist for the assessment of wadeable streams and creeks; however, the comprehensive development of a non-wadeable protocol did not exist for the state of Tennessee or the city. CDM Smith worked with a municipality to develop the protocol for the waterbody assessment, as well as to develop a standard for other assessments performed on the major rivers within the municipality.The SolutionCDM Smith consulted several guidance documents in development of the protocol that used a combination of both wadeable and non-wadeable streams. This manuscript will cover the guidance documents used and the information that was obtained from each of these for the specific impairments observed in the West Tennessee watershed. The protocol was developed for evaluation of the watershed based on land uses observed within the city; potential locations for pathogen impairment; siltation and habitat impairment parameters; and logical, logistical, access points to the river.Based on a review of the guidance documents, CDM Smith created a series of field data sheets to be used during the evaluation of the river. These data sheets were created to quickly assess and obtain qualitative data observations for characteristics of the river. Data relating to pathogens and siltation and habitat impairments were listed to be gathered during the assessment to develop criteria for future trending of the watershed.Field WorkThe visual assessment was performed through canoe access within the river to allow for appropriate investigation of the banks with follow-up via foot reconnaissance to verify potential areas of concern and collect required additional data. After the assessment was completed, the collected data was compiled into an evaluation report to assess the overall health of the river and watershed and provide a baseline for continuing assessment in the future. The primary objectives of the assessment were to identify and prioritize stream impairment sources, as well as, identify potential best management practices (BMPs) and corrective measures to remedy the priority areas.ConclusionThis presentation will describe the protocol development, coordination with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) and other regulatory agencies, methods and logistics for performing a successful visual stream assessment in a non-wadeable river, examples of potential data produced from the assessment, and methodology for compiling all of the data and summarizing the findings into a useable format for future improvements and corrective measures.There is increasing development of TMDLs and requirements for performance of visual stream assessments on all TMDLs developed for pathogen and siltation and habitat alteration. This manuscript will provide an overview and specific example of a successful visual assessment along with some lessons learned from our experiences.
Introduction
Author(s)
Michelle Hatcher
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811725555
Volume / Issue2012 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2012
Word count575

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W12-Proceedings
Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-280581
Get access
-280581
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W12-Proceedings
Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River
Abstract
IntroductionAs part of the new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 permit regulations for Tennessee, all impaired waterbodies within the city limits are required to have visual impairment inventories performed within the 5-year permit cycle. CDM Smith performed a visual stream assessment for a watershed in West Tennessee within the urbanized portion of the waterbody. The waterbody also included several sections that are impaired for pathogens, as listed on the State's 2010 303(d) list. As part of the pathogen total maximum daily load (TMDL) for the waterbody, a visual stream impairment inventory is also required to be performed within 5 years of the TMDL issuance.The ScopeA unique aspect of this project is the fact that the waterbody is a non-wadeable stream. Several protocols already exist for the assessment of wadeable streams and creeks; however, the comprehensive development of a non-wadeable protocol did not exist for the state of Tennessee or the city. CDM Smith worked with a municipality to develop the protocol for the waterbody assessment, as well as to develop a standard for other assessments performed on the major rivers within the municipality.The SolutionCDM Smith consulted several guidance documents in development of the protocol that used a combination of both wadeable and non-wadeable streams. This manuscript will cover the guidance documents used and the information that was obtained from each of these for the specific impairments observed in the West Tennessee watershed. The protocol was developed for evaluation of the watershed based on land uses observed within the city; potential locations for pathogen impairment; siltation and habitat impairment parameters; and logical, logistical, access points to the river.Based on a review of the guidance documents, CDM Smith created a series of field data sheets to be used during the evaluation of the river. These data sheets were created to quickly assess and obtain qualitative data observations for characteristics of the river. Data relating to pathogens and siltation and habitat impairments were listed to be gathered during the assessment to develop criteria for future trending of the watershed.Field WorkThe visual assessment was performed through canoe access within the river to allow for appropriate investigation of the banks with follow-up via foot reconnaissance to verify potential areas of concern and collect required additional data. After the assessment was completed, the collected data was compiled into an evaluation report to assess the overall health of the river and watershed and provide a baseline for continuing assessment in the future. The primary objectives of the assessment were to identify and prioritize stream impairment sources, as well as, identify potential best management practices (BMPs) and corrective measures to remedy the priority areas.ConclusionThis presentation will describe the protocol development, coordination with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) and other regulatory agencies, methods and logistics for performing a successful visual stream assessment in a non-wadeable river, examples of potential data produced from the assessment, and methodology for compiling all of the data and summarizing the findings into a useable format for future improvements and corrective measures.There is increasing development of TMDLs and requirements for performance of visual stream assessments on all TMDLs developed for pathogen and siltation and habitat alteration. This manuscript will provide an overview and specific example of a successful visual assessment along with some lessons learned from our experiences.
Introduction
Author(s)
Michelle Hatcher
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811725555
Volume / Issue2012 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2012
Word count575

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Michelle Hatcher. Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-280581CITANCHOR>.
Michelle Hatcher. Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280581CITANCHOR.
Michelle Hatcher
Up a Creek with a Paddle: Performance of a Visual Stream Assessment in a Non-Wadeable River
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280581CITANCHOR