lastID = -280782
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed...
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:48:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 13:48:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:21:24 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:21:23 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:49:14 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:49:13 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 16:34:48 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 16:34:47 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 01:21:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 01:21:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:35:38 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:35:37 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed...
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge

Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge

Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed...
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge
Abstract
A comparison of the treatment of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) and mixed sludge (primary sludge (PS) and TWAS) with anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) was conducted. The comparison was conducted at an SRT of 30 days and an HRT of 15 days that resulted in average reactor TS concentrations of 2% for the TWAS feed and 3.4% for the mixed sludge feed. The volatile solids reduction (VSr), chemical oxygen demand reduction (CODr) and methane yield with the mixed sludge feed were respectively 16%, 18% and 1%, greater than with the TWAS feed. The average daily fluxes were 35 and 20 L/m2·h (LMH) at corresponding average transmembrane pressures of 29 and 20 kPa, when TWAS and mixed sludge were treated respectively. The reduced flux with mixed sludge (31%) corresponded to a 40% increase (18 g/L to 30 g/L) of TS in the AnMBR. The average fouling index (FI) was 20% higher when treating mixed sludge as compared to TWAS. A cleaning strategy that included four sequential steps: (1) a hot water (55–60 °C) flush; (2) an abrasive clean using 25 mm diameter manufacturer-supplied sponge balls; (3) an alkali clean (NaOH (aq) solution, pH=10, 55–60 °C) and (4) an acid clean (citric acid, C6O7H8 (aq) solution, pH=2, 55–60 °C) was evaluated. The water flush and acid clean proved to be the most effective components of the sequence.
A comparison of the treatment of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) and mixed sludge (primary sludge (PS) and TWAS) with anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) was conducted. The comparison was conducted at an SRT of 30 days and an HRT of 15 days that resulted in average reactor TS concentrations of 2% for the TWAS feed and 3.4% for the...
Author(s)
V. PileggiM. DagnewW. ParkerP. Seto
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Mar, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811693812
Volume / Issue2012 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2012
Word count239

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed...
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-280782
Get access
-280782
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed...
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge
Abstract
A comparison of the treatment of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) and mixed sludge (primary sludge (PS) and TWAS) with anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) was conducted. The comparison was conducted at an SRT of 30 days and an HRT of 15 days that resulted in average reactor TS concentrations of 2% for the TWAS feed and 3.4% for the mixed sludge feed. The volatile solids reduction (VSr), chemical oxygen demand reduction (CODr) and methane yield with the mixed sludge feed were respectively 16%, 18% and 1%, greater than with the TWAS feed. The average daily fluxes were 35 and 20 L/m2·h (LMH) at corresponding average transmembrane pressures of 29 and 20 kPa, when TWAS and mixed sludge were treated respectively. The reduced flux with mixed sludge (31%) corresponded to a 40% increase (18 g/L to 30 g/L) of TS in the AnMBR. The average fouling index (FI) was 20% higher when treating mixed sludge as compared to TWAS. A cleaning strategy that included four sequential steps: (1) a hot water (55–60 °C) flush; (2) an abrasive clean using 25 mm diameter manufacturer-supplied sponge balls; (3) an alkali clean (NaOH (aq) solution, pH=10, 55–60 °C) and (4) an acid clean (citric acid, C6O7H8 (aq) solution, pH=2, 55–60 °C) was evaluated. The water flush and acid clean proved to be the most effective components of the sequence.
A comparison of the treatment of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) and mixed sludge (primary sludge (PS) and TWAS) with anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) was conducted. The comparison was conducted at an SRT of 30 days and an HRT of 15 days that resulted in average reactor TS concentrations of 2% for the TWAS feed and 3.4% for the...
Author(s)
V. PileggiM. DagnewW. ParkerP. Seto
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Mar, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811693812
Volume / Issue2012 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2012
Word count239

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
V. Pileggi# M. Dagnew# W. Parker# P. Seto. Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-280782CITANCHOR>.
V. Pileggi# M. Dagnew# W. Parker# P. Seto. Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280782CITANCHOR.
V. Pileggi# M. Dagnew# W. Parker# P. Seto
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (ANMBR) for Sludge Digestion: TWAS Versus Mixed Sludge
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280782CITANCHOR