lastID = -280869
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief...
What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 21:48:12 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 21:48:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:34:58 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:34:57 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 15:33:51 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 15:33:49 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-26 22:40:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:40:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 06:58:54 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:58:53 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:58:52 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief...
What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects

What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects

What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief...
What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects
Abstract
Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. (CMT) was selected by the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) to conduct a pre-design study of the Coldwater Creek trunk sewer which serves the nearly 50-square mile Coldwater Creek Service Area. The purpose of the predesign study was to evaluate all facets of a sanitary trunk sewer relief project that would provide the best alternative to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and basement back-ups. The sections of trunk sewer evaluated are approximately 9.4 miles long and range in size from 24-inch to 72-inch diameter.MSD's conventional solution to most cases of surcharging sanitary sewers and basement backups that occur under wet weather conditions has been the construction of relief sewers to provide more sewer capacity. With a relief sewer, the excess wet weather flows could be transported to the wastewater treatment plant site where they would be stored until the wet weather event ended and the treatment plant had available capacity to treat the stored wastewater. MSD's conceptual design for this project was a deep tunnel relief sewer with an estimated cost of $120 - $160 million.However, the results of the pre-design study showed that the preferred alternative included a combination of two off-line flow equalization storage tanks out in the collection system, some relief sewers to be installed by microtunneling methods, and rehabilitation of the existing trunk sewer. By being able to store the excess wet weather flows out in the collection system instead of at the treatment plant, over 9 miles of relief sewers ranging in size from 30-inch to 96-inch diameter would not be needed. This preferred alternative, estimated to cost $87 million, had a significant cost savings compared to the second best alternative consisting of construction of a relief sewer by deep tunneling, estimated to cost $168 million.Our paper will discuss the four phases of the pre-design study: 1) Investigative Phase, 2) Development of the Selected Alternatives, 3) Preferred Alternative Phase, and 4) Preliminary Design Phase. We will also discuss some details of the alternatives evaluated. We will discuss several factors to consider when determining whether off-line storage out in the collection system will be feasible and cost effective for a given watershed. We will describe the hydraulic modeling used to size the flow equalization storage tanks, including a continuous simulation using 54 years of historical rainfall data to evaluate the effects of sequential storms on the required storage tank volumes.MSD subsequently selected CMT for final design of the first of the two recommended storage tank facilities, called Wet Weather Storage Facility Tank A. Our paper will discuss details of the final design of this storage facility and why certain features were selected.The Tank A facilities will include a 6 million gallon storage tank that is 180 feet in diameter with side water depth of 32 feet, a diversion structure, a pump station with a 30,000 gpm capacity to pump into the tank, an odor control system, and a real time control system that will automatically operate the facilities. The water levels in the trunk sewer will be monitored at manholes approximately 2, 4 and 6 miles downstream from Tank A. This data will be transmitted by radio back to the Tank A site for control of gates and valves that will divert wastewater into the tank and allow it to drain back out of the tank at the appropriate times to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows.Several “green” features have been included in the design. Instead of using potable water, rainwater that falls on the domed roof of the tank is being collected in a cistern for use in cleaning the tank with spray wash nozzles after each wastewater storage event. A rain garden detention basin is being constructed to allow infiltration of runoff from the impervious paved areas to be constructed on the site.The site for the Coldwater Tank A is very visible to the public, located immediately adjacent to the Cypress Road ramp onto I-70 across from Lambert St. Louis International Airport. MSD and CMT worked with a citizen's committee from the City of St. Ann to develop aesthetic enhancements for the storage tank to make it more visually appealing.The SSO storage tank facilities for the Coldwater Tank A project will be the first of its type in MSD's collection system. MSD staff has recognized this as a cost effective solution for eliminating sanitary sewer overflows and have plans for a number of additional SSO storage tanks in their upcoming multi-billion dollar capital improvement program.
Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. (CMT) was selected by the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) to conduct a pre-design study of the Coldwater Creek trunk sewer which serves the nearly 50-square mile Coldwater Creek Service Area. The purpose of the predesign study was to evaluate all facets of a sanitary trunk sewer relief project that would provide the best alternative to eliminate...
Author(s)
Tim TappendorfKurtis EisenbathJeff Shiner
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jun, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811699870
Volume / Issue2012 / 4
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
Copyright2012
Word count767

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief...
What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-280869
Get access
-280869
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief...
What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects
Abstract
Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. (CMT) was selected by the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) to conduct a pre-design study of the Coldwater Creek trunk sewer which serves the nearly 50-square mile Coldwater Creek Service Area. The purpose of the predesign study was to evaluate all facets of a sanitary trunk sewer relief project that would provide the best alternative to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and basement back-ups. The sections of trunk sewer evaluated are approximately 9.4 miles long and range in size from 24-inch to 72-inch diameter.MSD's conventional solution to most cases of surcharging sanitary sewers and basement backups that occur under wet weather conditions has been the construction of relief sewers to provide more sewer capacity. With a relief sewer, the excess wet weather flows could be transported to the wastewater treatment plant site where they would be stored until the wet weather event ended and the treatment plant had available capacity to treat the stored wastewater. MSD's conceptual design for this project was a deep tunnel relief sewer with an estimated cost of $120 - $160 million.However, the results of the pre-design study showed that the preferred alternative included a combination of two off-line flow equalization storage tanks out in the collection system, some relief sewers to be installed by microtunneling methods, and rehabilitation of the existing trunk sewer. By being able to store the excess wet weather flows out in the collection system instead of at the treatment plant, over 9 miles of relief sewers ranging in size from 30-inch to 96-inch diameter would not be needed. This preferred alternative, estimated to cost $87 million, had a significant cost savings compared to the second best alternative consisting of construction of a relief sewer by deep tunneling, estimated to cost $168 million.Our paper will discuss the four phases of the pre-design study: 1) Investigative Phase, 2) Development of the Selected Alternatives, 3) Preferred Alternative Phase, and 4) Preliminary Design Phase. We will also discuss some details of the alternatives evaluated. We will discuss several factors to consider when determining whether off-line storage out in the collection system will be feasible and cost effective for a given watershed. We will describe the hydraulic modeling used to size the flow equalization storage tanks, including a continuous simulation using 54 years of historical rainfall data to evaluate the effects of sequential storms on the required storage tank volumes.MSD subsequently selected CMT for final design of the first of the two recommended storage tank facilities, called Wet Weather Storage Facility Tank A. Our paper will discuss details of the final design of this storage facility and why certain features were selected.The Tank A facilities will include a 6 million gallon storage tank that is 180 feet in diameter with side water depth of 32 feet, a diversion structure, a pump station with a 30,000 gpm capacity to pump into the tank, an odor control system, and a real time control system that will automatically operate the facilities. The water levels in the trunk sewer will be monitored at manholes approximately 2, 4 and 6 miles downstream from Tank A. This data will be transmitted by radio back to the Tank A site for control of gates and valves that will divert wastewater into the tank and allow it to drain back out of the tank at the appropriate times to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows.Several “green” features have been included in the design. Instead of using potable water, rainwater that falls on the domed roof of the tank is being collected in a cistern for use in cleaning the tank with spray wash nozzles after each wastewater storage event. A rain garden detention basin is being constructed to allow infiltration of runoff from the impervious paved areas to be constructed on the site.The site for the Coldwater Tank A is very visible to the public, located immediately adjacent to the Cypress Road ramp onto I-70 across from Lambert St. Louis International Airport. MSD and CMT worked with a citizen's committee from the City of St. Ann to develop aesthetic enhancements for the storage tank to make it more visually appealing.The SSO storage tank facilities for the Coldwater Tank A project will be the first of its type in MSD's collection system. MSD staff has recognized this as a cost effective solution for eliminating sanitary sewer overflows and have plans for a number of additional SSO storage tanks in their upcoming multi-billion dollar capital improvement program.
Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. (CMT) was selected by the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) to conduct a pre-design study of the Coldwater Creek trunk sewer which serves the nearly 50-square mile Coldwater Creek Service Area. The purpose of the predesign study was to evaluate all facets of a sanitary trunk sewer relief project that would provide the best alternative to eliminate...
Author(s)
Tim TappendorfKurtis EisenbathJeff Shiner
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jun, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811699870
Volume / Issue2012 / 4
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
Copyright2012
Word count767

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Tim Tappendorf# Kurtis Eisenbath# Jeff Shiner. What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 27 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-280869CITANCHOR>.
Tim Tappendorf# Kurtis Eisenbath# Jeff Shiner. What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed August 27, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280869CITANCHOR.
Tim Tappendorf# Kurtis Eisenbath# Jeff Shiner
What Makes a SSO Storage Tank a Cost Effective Alternative for Sanitary Relief Projects
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
August 27, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280869CITANCHOR