lastID = -287318
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:09:20 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 20:09:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:52:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 03:12:43 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 03:12:42 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?

PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?

PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?
Abstract
Disinfection needs are based on receiving water requirements, with inland freshwater bodies typically having a 200 fecal coliform per 100 ml criteria and marine waters having a 35 enterococci per 100 ml criteria. These impacts can dilute the treated wastewater by several hundred to several thousand times signifying that the fecal indicator density leaving the facility can be several orders of magnitude greater than the receiving water criteria. This than can be translated into a two or two and a half log reduction for primary treated wastewater discharged through an ocean outfall.When disinfection is being considered for primary effluent discharging through a ocean outfall, which disinfectant will achieve the targeted fecal indicator density while maintaining process controllability. Keeping this in mind, there are two fundamental wastewater disinfection methods commonly used today: chemical (chlorine, halogen compounds, and ozone) and physical (ultraviolet radiation – UV). All disinfection methods have various factors influencing their effectiveness (WERF 1995). One important water quality parameter relative to disinfection dose (concentration/intensity and time) and organism survival is wastewater particles (suspended solids – both mass and size distribution) that reduce disinfectant (chemical or physical) effectiveness by interfering with the disinfection mechanism or by microbe shielding (organism entrapped in a particle). Chlorine is still a very commonly used disinfectant and UV is increasing in its use.An additional parameter (salt water infiltration) influenced the results of this study. Morning and afternoon testing showed high variation in the chlorine disinfection, while this impact on the UV disinfection was minimal. Bench-scale chlorine disinfection evaluation, chlorine demand evaluation, collimated-beam UV disinfection evaluation, and diurnal characteristics were performed for the primary effluent at the Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant. Chlorine work analyzed chlorine residual, and ORP along with enterococci and fecal coliform. UV work analyzed UVT254 along with enterococci and fecal coliform. Diurnal characteristics analysis included conductivity, total and volatile suspended solids, turbidity, UVT254, total and soluble BOD5, Clostridium perfringens, enterococci, fecal coliform, and FRNA bacteriophage. Not all of the diurnal characteristics are illustrated in this paper.
Disinfection needs are based on receiving water requirements, with inland freshwater bodies typically having a 200 fecal coliform per 100 ml criteria and marine waters having a 35 enterococci per 100 ml criteria. These impacts can dilute the treated wastewater by several hundred to several thousand times signifying that the fecal indicator density leaving the facility can be several orders of...
Author(s)
Victor MorelandAudrey AsahinaRoger FujiokaTua UnutoaJennifer HondaEassie MillerPeter OnoDon PiepgrassKenn Sprague
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSESSION 11: TIMELY TOPICS
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:2L.635;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785371885
Volume / Issue2000 / 2
Content sourceDisinfection and Reuse Symposium
First / last page(s)635 - 662
Copyright2000
Word count339

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-287318
Get access
-287318
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?
Abstract
Disinfection needs are based on receiving water requirements, with inland freshwater bodies typically having a 200 fecal coliform per 100 ml criteria and marine waters having a 35 enterococci per 100 ml criteria. These impacts can dilute the treated wastewater by several hundred to several thousand times signifying that the fecal indicator density leaving the facility can be several orders of magnitude greater than the receiving water criteria. This than can be translated into a two or two and a half log reduction for primary treated wastewater discharged through an ocean outfall.When disinfection is being considered for primary effluent discharging through a ocean outfall, which disinfectant will achieve the targeted fecal indicator density while maintaining process controllability. Keeping this in mind, there are two fundamental wastewater disinfection methods commonly used today: chemical (chlorine, halogen compounds, and ozone) and physical (ultraviolet radiation – UV). All disinfection methods have various factors influencing their effectiveness (WERF 1995). One important water quality parameter relative to disinfection dose (concentration/intensity and time) and organism survival is wastewater particles (suspended solids – both mass and size distribution) that reduce disinfectant (chemical or physical) effectiveness by interfering with the disinfection mechanism or by microbe shielding (organism entrapped in a particle). Chlorine is still a very commonly used disinfectant and UV is increasing in its use.An additional parameter (salt water infiltration) influenced the results of this study. Morning and afternoon testing showed high variation in the chlorine disinfection, while this impact on the UV disinfection was minimal. Bench-scale chlorine disinfection evaluation, chlorine demand evaluation, collimated-beam UV disinfection evaluation, and diurnal characteristics were performed for the primary effluent at the Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant. Chlorine work analyzed chlorine residual, and ORP along with enterococci and fecal coliform. UV work analyzed UVT254 along with enterococci and fecal coliform. Diurnal characteristics analysis included conductivity, total and volatile suspended solids, turbidity, UVT254, total and soluble BOD5, Clostridium perfringens, enterococci, fecal coliform, and FRNA bacteriophage. Not all of the diurnal characteristics are illustrated in this paper.
Disinfection needs are based on receiving water requirements, with inland freshwater bodies typically having a 200 fecal coliform per 100 ml criteria and marine waters having a 35 enterococci per 100 ml criteria. These impacts can dilute the treated wastewater by several hundred to several thousand times signifying that the fecal indicator density leaving the facility can be several orders of...
Author(s)
Victor MorelandAudrey AsahinaRoger FujiokaTua UnutoaJennifer HondaEassie MillerPeter OnoDon PiepgrassKenn Sprague
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSESSION 11: TIMELY TOPICS
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:2L.635;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785371885
Volume / Issue2000 / 2
Content sourceDisinfection and Reuse Symposium
First / last page(s)635 - 662
Copyright2000
Word count339

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Victor Moreland# Audrey Asahina# Roger Fujioka# Tua Unutoa# Jennifer Honda# Eassie Miller# Peter Ono# Don Piepgrass# Kenn Sprague. PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 18 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-287318CITANCHOR>.
Victor Moreland# Audrey Asahina# Roger Fujioka# Tua Unutoa# Jennifer Honda# Eassie Miller# Peter Ono# Don Piepgrass# Kenn Sprague. PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 18, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287318CITANCHOR.
Victor Moreland# Audrey Asahina# Roger Fujioka# Tua Unutoa# Jennifer Honda# Eassie Miller# Peter Ono# Don Piepgrass# Kenn Sprague
PRIMARY EFFLUENT: CHLORINE OR UV RADIATION DISINFECTION?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 18, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287318CITANCHOR