lastID = -287350
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:19:28 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 20:19:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:09:12 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 18:48:59 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:48:58 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD

A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD

A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD
Abstract
Odor impact from sewage treatment plants can be predicted using air dispersion models such as Ausplume or ISCIII. In this study, a flux hood and a portable wind tunnel system were used together with forced choice dynamic olfactometry to determine odor emission rates from various processing units at a medium sized sewage treatment plant. In all cases, the olfactometry measurements conformed to the requirements of the most recent draft European and Australian standard on odor concentration measurement using dynamic olfactometer. Both sets of emission results were used as input data to the Ausplume air dispersion model. The odor emission rates determined using the portable wind tunnel system were adjusted for ambient wind speeds to take into account the empirically demonstrated, theoretical relationship between wind speeds and odor emission rates from open surface area sources. Odor concentration isopleths were calculated using meteorological data recorded on site, and, alternatively, synthetic meteorological data for both the wind tunnel and flux hood cases. Concentration levels for odor isopleths based on wind tunnel measurement inputs were found to be about four fold greater than the ones based on flux hood measurements. In both cases, the modelling results showed little difference using both recorded and synthetic meteorological data. The results of the case study suggest the development of alternative assessment criteria for modelling results derived from flux hood measurements would not offer a satisfactory solution as the relative contributions of the various sources were substantially different for the wind tunnel and flux hood. The wind tunnel is preferred for emission sampling as the results can be adjusted in the model for the actual ground level wind speeds and the fetch lengths of area sources. This is not possible with the flux hood. Synthetic meteorological data simulate possible weather conditions and provide a useful tool in air dispersion modelling.
Odor impact from sewage treatment plants can be predicted using air dispersion models such as Ausplume or ISCIII. In this study, a flux hood and a portable wind tunnel system were used together with forced choice dynamic olfactometry to determine odor emission rates from various processing units at a medium sized sewage treatment plant. In all cases, the olfactometry measurements conformed to the...
Author(s)
J.K. JiangR. Kaye
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSESSION 4: METHODS FOR SAMPLING, MEASURING AND ESTIMATING EMISSIONS PART I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:3L.292;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785303088
Volume / Issue2000 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)292 - 300
Copyright2000
Word count319

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-287350
Get access
-287350
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD
Abstract
Odor impact from sewage treatment plants can be predicted using air dispersion models such as Ausplume or ISCIII. In this study, a flux hood and a portable wind tunnel system were used together with forced choice dynamic olfactometry to determine odor emission rates from various processing units at a medium sized sewage treatment plant. In all cases, the olfactometry measurements conformed to the requirements of the most recent draft European and Australian standard on odor concentration measurement using dynamic olfactometer. Both sets of emission results were used as input data to the Ausplume air dispersion model. The odor emission rates determined using the portable wind tunnel system were adjusted for ambient wind speeds to take into account the empirically demonstrated, theoretical relationship between wind speeds and odor emission rates from open surface area sources. Odor concentration isopleths were calculated using meteorological data recorded on site, and, alternatively, synthetic meteorological data for both the wind tunnel and flux hood cases. Concentration levels for odor isopleths based on wind tunnel measurement inputs were found to be about four fold greater than the ones based on flux hood measurements. In both cases, the modelling results showed little difference using both recorded and synthetic meteorological data. The results of the case study suggest the development of alternative assessment criteria for modelling results derived from flux hood measurements would not offer a satisfactory solution as the relative contributions of the various sources were substantially different for the wind tunnel and flux hood. The wind tunnel is preferred for emission sampling as the results can be adjusted in the model for the actual ground level wind speeds and the fetch lengths of area sources. This is not possible with the flux hood. Synthetic meteorological data simulate possible weather conditions and provide a useful tool in air dispersion modelling.
Odor impact from sewage treatment plants can be predicted using air dispersion models such as Ausplume or ISCIII. In this study, a flux hood and a portable wind tunnel system were used together with forced choice dynamic olfactometry to determine odor emission rates from various processing units at a medium sized sewage treatment plant. In all cases, the olfactometry measurements conformed to the...
Author(s)
J.K. JiangR. Kaye
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSESSION 4: METHODS FOR SAMPLING, MEASURING AND ESTIMATING EMISSIONS PART I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:3L.292;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785303088
Volume / Issue2000 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)292 - 300
Copyright2000
Word count319

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
J.K. Jiang# R. Kaye. A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 14 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-287350CITANCHOR>.
J.K. Jiang# R. Kaye. A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 14, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287350CITANCHOR.
J.K. Jiang# R. Kaye
A COMPARISON OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS USING EMISSION DATA FROM WIND TUNNEL AND FLUX HOOD
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 14, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287350CITANCHOR