lastID = -288111
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 22:53:37 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:53:36 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99

EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99

EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99
Abstract
The regional gravel aquifer (RGA) at the U.S. Department of Energy's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah, Kentucky) is contaminated with several plumes of trichloroethylene (TCE) and technetium-99 (99Tc) that are migrating off-site, towards the Ohio River. One of the technologies under consideration for treatment is a permeable treatment zone (PTZ). To test the feasibility of this approach, a 30.5-m test section of a reactive material will be installed. Because of the depth of the groundwater in the RGA (18-38 m below the surface), the reactive material will be delivered in a guar gum suspension by hydraulic fracturing. The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate three reactive materials, alone and in combination, for possible use in the PTZ: medium cut zero valent iron (Master Builders), surfactant modified zeolite (SMZ), and granular Humate (Sundine Enterprises). It was hypothesized that a mixture of reactive material might be required to accomplish removal of TCE and 99Tc. Batch adsorption and kinetic tests as well as continuous flow column tests were conducted with groundwater and soil from the site, containing approximately 940 μg/L of TCE and 840 pCi/L of 99Tc. Feo alone was effective at removing both TCE and 99Tc, and hydrolyzed guar gum did not appear to interfere with Feo performance. Adsorption was initially the principal mechanism of TCE removal by Fe°, although the column results demonstrated that adsorption alone was inadequate to explain long-term performance. Ethene, ethane and acetylene were the predominant dechlorination products; the highest mass balance observed in the columns was 38% (mol products/mol TCE). It is not yet known how 99Tc is removed by Fe°, although reduction of soluble pertechnate (TcO4−) to insoluble TcO2 is one possibility. SMZ showed a very high adsorptive capacity for 99Tc, but a very low capacity for TCE. Humate removed TCE and 99Tc by adsorption, but its capacity was low in relation to other organic adsorbents such as activated carbon. It was recommended that Fe° alone be used in PTZ. Since 3.6 mg/L of dissolved oxygen in the groundwater represents an even greater demand on the Fe° than the TCE plus 99Tc, a reduction in oxygen upgradient of the PTZ (e.g., with sulfide or an organic amendment) will help to extend the life of the Fe°.
The regional gravel aquifer (RGA) at the U.S. Department of Energy's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah, Kentucky) is contaminated with several plumes of trichloroethylene (TCE) and technetium-99 (99Tc) that are migrating off-site, towards the Ohio River. One of the technologies under consideration for treatment is a permeable treatment zone (PTZ). To test the feasibility of this approach, a...
Author(s)
David L. FreedmanLawrence C. MurdochTanju KaranfilTimothy A. DeVolAnna SchankLara Drumm
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 25 - Remediation of Soils and Groundwater Symposium: In Situ Remedial Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:14L.530;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701802779413
Volume / Issue2001 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)530 - 544
Copyright2001
Word count386

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288111
Get access
-288111
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99
Abstract
The regional gravel aquifer (RGA) at the U.S. Department of Energy's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah, Kentucky) is contaminated with several plumes of trichloroethylene (TCE) and technetium-99 (99Tc) that are migrating off-site, towards the Ohio River. One of the technologies under consideration for treatment is a permeable treatment zone (PTZ). To test the feasibility of this approach, a 30.5-m test section of a reactive material will be installed. Because of the depth of the groundwater in the RGA (18-38 m below the surface), the reactive material will be delivered in a guar gum suspension by hydraulic fracturing. The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate three reactive materials, alone and in combination, for possible use in the PTZ: medium cut zero valent iron (Master Builders), surfactant modified zeolite (SMZ), and granular Humate (Sundine Enterprises). It was hypothesized that a mixture of reactive material might be required to accomplish removal of TCE and 99Tc. Batch adsorption and kinetic tests as well as continuous flow column tests were conducted with groundwater and soil from the site, containing approximately 940 μg/L of TCE and 840 pCi/L of 99Tc. Feo alone was effective at removing both TCE and 99Tc, and hydrolyzed guar gum did not appear to interfere with Feo performance. Adsorption was initially the principal mechanism of TCE removal by Fe°, although the column results demonstrated that adsorption alone was inadequate to explain long-term performance. Ethene, ethane and acetylene were the predominant dechlorination products; the highest mass balance observed in the columns was 38% (mol products/mol TCE). It is not yet known how 99Tc is removed by Fe°, although reduction of soluble pertechnate (TcO4−) to insoluble TcO2 is one possibility. SMZ showed a very high adsorptive capacity for 99Tc, but a very low capacity for TCE. Humate removed TCE and 99Tc by adsorption, but its capacity was low in relation to other organic adsorbents such as activated carbon. It was recommended that Fe° alone be used in PTZ. Since 3.6 mg/L of dissolved oxygen in the groundwater represents an even greater demand on the Fe° than the TCE plus 99Tc, a reduction in oxygen upgradient of the PTZ (e.g., with sulfide or an organic amendment) will help to extend the life of the Fe°.
The regional gravel aquifer (RGA) at the U.S. Department of Energy's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah, Kentucky) is contaminated with several plumes of trichloroethylene (TCE) and technetium-99 (99Tc) that are migrating off-site, towards the Ohio River. One of the technologies under consideration for treatment is a permeable treatment zone (PTZ). To test the feasibility of this approach, a...
Author(s)
David L. FreedmanLawrence C. MurdochTanju KaranfilTimothy A. DeVolAnna SchankLara Drumm
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 25 - Remediation of Soils and Groundwater Symposium: In Situ Remedial Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:14L.530;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701802779413
Volume / Issue2001 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)530 - 544
Copyright2001
Word count386

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
David L. Freedman# Lawrence C. Murdoch# Tanju Karanfil# Timothy A. DeVol# Anna Schank# Lara Drumm. EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 30 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288111CITANCHOR>.
David L. Freedman# Lawrence C. Murdoch# Tanju Karanfil# Timothy A. DeVol# Anna Schank# Lara Drumm. EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 30, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288111CITANCHOR.
David L. Freedman# Lawrence C. Murdoch# Tanju Karanfil# Timothy A. DeVol# Anna Schank# Lara Drumm
EVALUATION OF REACTIVE BARRIER MATERIALS FOR IN SITU TREATMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE AND TECHNETIUM-99
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 30, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288111CITANCHOR