lastID = -288122
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 06:47:52 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:47:51 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:47:50 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters

Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters

Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters
Abstract
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) completed its Long-Term Control Plan for CSO control (LTCP) in 1997. The plan used a watershed approach to assess the impacts of CSO in the context of other sources of pollution in the watershed, including stormwater and upstream flow. The recommended plan proposed to eliminate CSO to critical use areas, and cost-effectively minimize CSO in non-critical use areas. Regulatory acceptance of the plan was contingent upon changing existing water quality standards in areas where CSO would remain. At the time that the LTCP was being developed, the state water quality standards were being revised to establish a category under which minimized CSO discharges could remain, provided that certain specific conditions were met. Based on the MWRA's LTCP, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection agreed to revise the water quality standards for certain waters within Boston Harbor, but the two agencies did not agree on the methodology for meeting the criterion for “substantial and widespread social and economic impact”. For the Charles River, a twoyear water quality variance was granted to allow further study of the impacts of non-CSO sources of pollution, as well as for additional CSO control alternatives, prior to a final determination of the water quality standard. To date, certain conditions of the variance have been completed, while others are on-going. Key on-going variance activities include: an assessment of providing additional CSO storage; a performance evaluation of the MWRA's Cottage Farm CSO Facility, which discharges to the Charles River; development of a more detailed stormwater runoff model for areas tributary to the Charles River; and upgrading the receiving water model for the Charles River.
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) completed its Long-Term Control Plan for CSO control (LTCP) in 1997. The plan used a watershed approach to assess the impacts of CSO in the context of other sources of pollution in the watershed, including stormwater and upstream flow. The recommended plan proposed to eliminate CSO to critical use areas, and cost-effectively minimize CSO in...
Author(s)
Donald E. WalkerDaniel W. DonahueMichael J. HornbrookLise M. Marx
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 27 - Surface Water Quality and Ecology Symposium: CSO and Urban Stormwater Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:14L.664;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701802779260
Volume / Issue2001 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)664 - 681
Copyright2001
Word count300

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288122
Get access
-288122
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters
Abstract
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) completed its Long-Term Control Plan for CSO control (LTCP) in 1997. The plan used a watershed approach to assess the impacts of CSO in the context of other sources of pollution in the watershed, including stormwater and upstream flow. The recommended plan proposed to eliminate CSO to critical use areas, and cost-effectively minimize CSO in non-critical use areas. Regulatory acceptance of the plan was contingent upon changing existing water quality standards in areas where CSO would remain. At the time that the LTCP was being developed, the state water quality standards were being revised to establish a category under which minimized CSO discharges could remain, provided that certain specific conditions were met. Based on the MWRA's LTCP, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection agreed to revise the water quality standards for certain waters within Boston Harbor, but the two agencies did not agree on the methodology for meeting the criterion for “substantial and widespread social and economic impact”. For the Charles River, a twoyear water quality variance was granted to allow further study of the impacts of non-CSO sources of pollution, as well as for additional CSO control alternatives, prior to a final determination of the water quality standard. To date, certain conditions of the variance have been completed, while others are on-going. Key on-going variance activities include: an assessment of providing additional CSO storage; a performance evaluation of the MWRA's Cottage Farm CSO Facility, which discharges to the Charles River; development of a more detailed stormwater runoff model for areas tributary to the Charles River; and upgrading the receiving water model for the Charles River.
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) completed its Long-Term Control Plan for CSO control (LTCP) in 1997. The plan used a watershed approach to assess the impacts of CSO in the context of other sources of pollution in the watershed, including stormwater and upstream flow. The recommended plan proposed to eliminate CSO to critical use areas, and cost-effectively minimize CSO in...
Author(s)
Donald E. WalkerDaniel W. DonahueMichael J. HornbrookLise M. Marx
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 27 - Surface Water Quality and Ecology Symposium: CSO and Urban Stormwater Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:14L.664;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701802779260
Volume / Issue2001 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)664 - 681
Copyright2001
Word count300

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Donald E. Walker# Daniel W. Donahue# Michael J. Hornbrook# Lise M. Marx. Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288122CITANCHOR>.
Donald E. Walker# Daniel W. Donahue# Michael J. Hornbrook# Lise M. Marx. Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288122CITANCHOR.
Donald E. Walker# Daniel W. Donahue# Michael J. Hornbrook# Lise M. Marx
Water Quality Variance for the Charles River: An On-Going Example of the Process for Water Quality Standards Revisions for CSO-Impacted Waters
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288122CITANCHOR