lastID = -288307
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:05:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 15:05:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:58:39 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:58:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:01:49 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:01:48 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS

FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS

FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS
Abstract
A survey of the molybdenum (Mo) concentration in water treatment residuals WTR throughout Pennsylvania was conducted to establish the level of Mo in residuals generated at water treatment plants and interpret the findings in the context of land spreading of WTR. The average Mo value of 32 WTR samples was found to be 3.7 ppm, with 78% of the samples having Mo concentrations less than 5 ppm Mo. The findings of this study suggest that, in general, Mo levels in WTR will be well below the state regulatory land application limit of 18 ppm. However, Mo was present at concentrations above 10 ppm for three of the samples analyzed, with a maximum Mo value of 26.4 ppm. These results imply that the potential exists for Mo to limit land application of WTR in Pennsylvania. Coagulant type was found to be a primary factor influencing the Mo content of WTR. WTR from plants using ferric chloride averaged 5.6 ppm Mo, which was significantly higher (p = 0.05) than the 1.6 ppm Mo average for the WTR from plants using alum. This was a reflection of the Mo content of the coagulants since ferric chloride was found to have 10.0 ppm Mo while the Mo levels in alum were below detection limits for most samples.WTR from the Clarion Water Treatment Plant, were found to contain the highest Mo levels (26.4 ppm). A detailed study of this facility was undertaken to identify the source of this high Mo. Solids generated during coagulation contained 5.5 ppm Mo, whereas filter backwash solids contained 44.2 ppm Mo. This high Mo level is thought to be due to a combination of factors: (1) an elevated Mo level (7.6 ppm) in the river sediments, (2) enrichment of Mo on the surface of finer particles captured during filtration, and (3) erosion of anthracite coal media containing Mo during backwashing. This research indicates that several factors influence the Mo content of WTR. In the plants studied, treatment chemicals, water sources, and treatment processes were all found influence the Mo concentration in WTR.
A survey of the molybdenum (Mo) concentration in water treatment residuals WTR throughout Pennsylvania was conducted to establish the level of Mo in residuals generated at water treatment plants and interpret the findings in the context of land spreading of WTR. The average Mo value of 32 WTR samples was found to be 3.7 ppm, with 78% of the samples having Mo concentrations less than 5 ppm Mo. The...
Author(s)
Malcolm TaylorH. A. Elliott
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5: Regulatory Impacts of Water Treatment Residual Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.359;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784993254
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)359 - 371
Copyright2001
Word count350

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288307
Get access
-288307
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS
Abstract
A survey of the molybdenum (Mo) concentration in water treatment residuals WTR throughout Pennsylvania was conducted to establish the level of Mo in residuals generated at water treatment plants and interpret the findings in the context of land spreading of WTR. The average Mo value of 32 WTR samples was found to be 3.7 ppm, with 78% of the samples having Mo concentrations less than 5 ppm Mo. The findings of this study suggest that, in general, Mo levels in WTR will be well below the state regulatory land application limit of 18 ppm. However, Mo was present at concentrations above 10 ppm for three of the samples analyzed, with a maximum Mo value of 26.4 ppm. These results imply that the potential exists for Mo to limit land application of WTR in Pennsylvania. Coagulant type was found to be a primary factor influencing the Mo content of WTR. WTR from plants using ferric chloride averaged 5.6 ppm Mo, which was significantly higher (p = 0.05) than the 1.6 ppm Mo average for the WTR from plants using alum. This was a reflection of the Mo content of the coagulants since ferric chloride was found to have 10.0 ppm Mo while the Mo levels in alum were below detection limits for most samples.WTR from the Clarion Water Treatment Plant, were found to contain the highest Mo levels (26.4 ppm). A detailed study of this facility was undertaken to identify the source of this high Mo. Solids generated during coagulation contained 5.5 ppm Mo, whereas filter backwash solids contained 44.2 ppm Mo. This high Mo level is thought to be due to a combination of factors: (1) an elevated Mo level (7.6 ppm) in the river sediments, (2) enrichment of Mo on the surface of finer particles captured during filtration, and (3) erosion of anthracite coal media containing Mo during backwashing. This research indicates that several factors influence the Mo content of WTR. In the plants studied, treatment chemicals, water sources, and treatment processes were all found influence the Mo concentration in WTR.
A survey of the molybdenum (Mo) concentration in water treatment residuals WTR throughout Pennsylvania was conducted to establish the level of Mo in residuals generated at water treatment plants and interpret the findings in the context of land spreading of WTR. The average Mo value of 32 WTR samples was found to be 3.7 ppm, with 78% of the samples having Mo concentrations less than 5 ppm Mo. The...
Author(s)
Malcolm TaylorH. A. Elliott
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5: Regulatory Impacts of Water Treatment Residual Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.359;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784993254
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)359 - 371
Copyright2001
Word count350

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Malcolm Taylor# H. A. Elliott. FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288307CITANCHOR>.
Malcolm Taylor# H. A. Elliott. FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288307CITANCHOR.
Malcolm Taylor# H. A. Elliott
FACTORS INFLUENCING MOLYBDENUM CONCENTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288307CITANCHOR