lastID = -288705
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 05:42:32 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:42:31 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:42:30 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?

TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?

TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?
Abstract
It is becoming common for communities to switch from chlorine to ultraviolet light (UV) for wastewater treatment effluent disinfection. The concern for releases of chlorine to the environment due to accidents, the need to dechlorinate prior to discharge, as well as the introduction and refinement of medium pressure UV lamps has accelerated this transition. Additionally, other communities that never disinfected in the past are considering UV as the only viable means to comply with tighter bacteriological regulations.In many cases there has been a complacent attitude in this transition because of the pervasive belief that the UV disinfection process will work without risk of failure. This complacency extends to the point that many communities are not even bothering to measure the actual transmissivity of their wastewater prior to installing the new equipment. Rather, designs are based on assumed worse case conditions.This paper presents a case study of one community that did not bother to study their wastewater, but instead decided to base a design and a major construction project on an assumed wastewater transmissivity. What they found after everything was it place is that a perfectly clear effluent can have transmissivities well below 40 percent depending on the mix of domestic, industrial, and commercial wastes influent to the treatment plant.This investigation was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 included an in depth review of the design process and the interactions between the community staff, its consultants, and the UV equipment manufacturer. Wastewater treatment plant records, engineer reports and designs, correspondence, shop drawings, industrial waste discharge records, and interviews with personnel were all reviewed in piecing together what went wrong with what should have been a successful project.In Phase 2 a more detailed study of the transmissivities of the wastewater entering the plant and what happens in the wastewater treatment plant to UV blocking compounds was completed.The intent of this paper is to examine the decisions that were made for this community's project so that others do not make the same series of errors that can result in failure of a disinfection system, additional work for community staff, potential litigation for consultants, embarrassment for public officials, and poor relations with businesses in the community. Included in this paper is a listing of the simple steps that can be taken to prevent these problems in your community should you decide to consider making the transition to UV.
It is becoming common for communities to switch from chlorine to ultraviolet light (UV) for wastewater treatment effluent disinfection. The concern for releases of chlorine to the environment due to accidents, the need to dechlorinate prior to discharge, as well as the introduction and refinement of medium pressure UV lamps has accelerated this transition. Additionally, other communities that...
Author(s)
Larry ThomasPavel HajdaSteve ZehnerEric MurauskasT. Hank Martin
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 76 - International and Local Issues: Midwest Environmental Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:10L.265;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784164884
Volume / Issue2002 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)265 - 287
Copyright2002
Word count414

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288705
Get access
-288705
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?
Abstract
It is becoming common for communities to switch from chlorine to ultraviolet light (UV) for wastewater treatment effluent disinfection. The concern for releases of chlorine to the environment due to accidents, the need to dechlorinate prior to discharge, as well as the introduction and refinement of medium pressure UV lamps has accelerated this transition. Additionally, other communities that never disinfected in the past are considering UV as the only viable means to comply with tighter bacteriological regulations.In many cases there has been a complacent attitude in this transition because of the pervasive belief that the UV disinfection process will work without risk of failure. This complacency extends to the point that many communities are not even bothering to measure the actual transmissivity of their wastewater prior to installing the new equipment. Rather, designs are based on assumed worse case conditions.This paper presents a case study of one community that did not bother to study their wastewater, but instead decided to base a design and a major construction project on an assumed wastewater transmissivity. What they found after everything was it place is that a perfectly clear effluent can have transmissivities well below 40 percent depending on the mix of domestic, industrial, and commercial wastes influent to the treatment plant.This investigation was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 included an in depth review of the design process and the interactions between the community staff, its consultants, and the UV equipment manufacturer. Wastewater treatment plant records, engineer reports and designs, correspondence, shop drawings, industrial waste discharge records, and interviews with personnel were all reviewed in piecing together what went wrong with what should have been a successful project.In Phase 2 a more detailed study of the transmissivities of the wastewater entering the plant and what happens in the wastewater treatment plant to UV blocking compounds was completed.The intent of this paper is to examine the decisions that were made for this community's project so that others do not make the same series of errors that can result in failure of a disinfection system, additional work for community staff, potential litigation for consultants, embarrassment for public officials, and poor relations with businesses in the community. Included in this paper is a listing of the simple steps that can be taken to prevent these problems in your community should you decide to consider making the transition to UV.
It is becoming common for communities to switch from chlorine to ultraviolet light (UV) for wastewater treatment effluent disinfection. The concern for releases of chlorine to the environment due to accidents, the need to dechlorinate prior to discharge, as well as the introduction and refinement of medium pressure UV lamps has accelerated this transition. Additionally, other communities that...
Author(s)
Larry ThomasPavel HajdaSteve ZehnerEric MurauskasT. Hank Martin
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 76 - International and Local Issues: Midwest Environmental Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:10L.265;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784164884
Volume / Issue2002 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)265 - 287
Copyright2002
Word count414

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Larry Thomas# Pavel Hajda# Steve Zehner# Eric Murauskas# T. Hank Martin. TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 26 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288705CITANCHOR>.
Larry Thomas# Pavel Hajda# Steve Zehner# Eric Murauskas# T. Hank Martin. TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 26, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288705CITANCHOR.
Larry Thomas# Pavel Hajda# Steve Zehner# Eric Murauskas# T. Hank Martin
TO UV OR NOT TO UV, IS THAT THE QUESTION? OR IS IT: WHEN IS CLEAR WATER NOT TRANSPARENT?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 26, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288705CITANCHOR